my friend this question is wrong how can Matthew have 87 in his bank account and spend 112 on books
-11
3
-3
11
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
-7 + 4= -3
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Kevin has been working as an auto-mechanic. For maximizing weekly income Kevin should do 6 breaks replacement and 4 shock replacements. The time required for performing both the tasks has been equal. Since the time required has been the same, to increase the income, the task resulting in more income has been prioritized
Given :
Since there have been more income with shock replacement, the brake replacement task has been prioritized.
The time Kevin works in a week has been 42 hours. Since each job takes 2 hours, the number of jobs he can perform has been 21 jobs.
The routine jobsof brake replacement performed by Kevin have been 6. Thus to increase his income, the rest jobs have been of shock replacement.
The number of shock replacement tasks performed by the Kevin =
= 21 - 6
= 15
The number of shock replacement jobs = 15.
Thus for increasing the income Kevin has to perform 6 brake replacement tasks and 15 shock replacement tasks.
For more information, refer to the link given below:
Answer:
Kevin should do 15 shock replacements and 6 brake replacements every week to maximize his weekly income.
Step-by-step explanation:
Both jobs take the same amount of time to complete (2 hours), therefore, in order to maximize his income, Kevin should prioritize the job that gives him the greatest income, which is replacing shocks.
If each job takes 2 hours and he works at most 42 hours per week, Kevin can complete 21 jobs per week. He should aim to do as little break replacements as possible and as many shock replacements as possible to maximize income.
If he completes at least 6 break replacements, the remaining jobs should all be shock replacements:
Kevin should do 15 shock replacements and 6 brake replacements every week to maximize his weekly income.
- 3 is a solution that satisfies both inequalities.So, the correct answer is True.The compound inequality consists of two separate inequalities connected by "and."
1.b ≤ 4:This means that "b" is less than or equal to 4.
2.b > −1:This means that "b" is greater than -1.
If we consider a number line, the values that satisfy both conditions are those that are greater than -1 but also less than or equal to 4. The value -3 falls within this range. It is greater than -1 and also less than 4.
Therefore, -3 is a solution that satisfies both inequalities, making the statement true.
To know more about inequalities:
#SPJ3
Answer:
TRUE
hope it's right
:)
:)
Step-by-step explanation: