Answer:
Answer is yes
Explanation:
(B) $50,000.
(C) $140,000.
(D) $35,000.
(E) $200,000.
Answer: The correct answer is "(E) $200,000.".
The proper cash flow to show in a discounted-cash-flow analysis as occurring at time 0 would be: "(E) $200,000.".
Explanation: At time 0, the course of time does not occur therefore there is no discount.
b. No, the NPV calculation will take into account not only the project's cash inflows but also the timing of cash inflows and outflows. Consequently, Project B could have a larger NPV than Project A, even though Project A has larger cash inflows.
c. No, the NPV calculation is based on percentage returns. So, the size of the project's cash flows does not affect a project's NPV.
Answer:
b. No, the NPV calculation will take into account not only the project's cash inflows but also the timing of cash inflows and outflows. Consequently, Project B could have a larger NPV than Project A, even though Project A has larger cash inflows.
Explanation:
The net present value is the present value of after tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
An example:
Suppose there are two projects with a cash outlay of $500.
The cash flow for project A :
Cash flow from year 1 to 3 =$0
Cash flow from year 4 to 7 =$ 500
WACC = 10%
Using a financial calculator, the NPV =$690.78
The cash flow for project B
Cash flow for year one and two =$300
Cash flow for year three = $100
Cash flow for year four and five =$500
WACC = 10%
using a financial calculator, the NPV = $747.76
From this example, even though the cash flow from project A is higher than the cash flow from project B, project B's NPV is higher.
I hope my answer helps you.
B) identify the required skills.
C) negotiate with the functional supervisor.
D) notify top management.
Answer:
B) identify the required skills.
Explanation:
After the scope of a project has been clearly defined with the goal well understood, in assembling a project team there is a need to first identify the required skills for the project.
This is key and has to be done before talking to potential team members, negotiating with the functional supervisor and notifying top management.
Answer:
Journal entries:
cash 493,574.88 debit
bonds payable 435,000.00 credit
premium on bp 58,574.88 credit
--to record issuance--
Interest expense 19743
Amortization 6357
cash 26100
--to record Dec 31st, 2020--
Interest expense 19488.72
Amortization 6611.28
cash 26100
--to record June 30th, 2021--
bonds payable 130,500.00 debit
premium on bp 13,681.98 debit
interest expense 17,400.00 debit
gain on redemption 25,081.98 credit
cash 136,500.00 credit
--to record redemption--
premium on BP 4,813.04 debit
interest expense 13,456.96 debit
cash 18,270 credit
-- to record December 31st, 2021--
Explanation:
First, we solve for the proceeds from the bonds payable:
C 26,100 (435,000 x 12% / 2)
time 8 ( 4 years x 2)
yield to maturity 0.04 ( 8% / 2)
PV $175,724.6412
Maturity 435,000.00
time 8.00
rate 0.04
PV 317,850.24
PV c $175,724.6412
PV m $317,850.2392
Total $493,574.8804
We now build the amortization schedule.
We take this value, we multiply by the interest rate and then, solve for amortization and ending carrying value.
To record the redemption:
accrued interest:
435,000 x 0.12 x 4/12 (months from June to oct) = 17,400
premium:
480,606.6 - 435,000 = 45,606.6
proportional of premium:
45,606 / 435,000 x 130,500 = 13.681,98
we now solve for the gain/loss on redemption:
130,500 + 13,681.98 + 17,400 = 161.581,9 value redeem
for cash 136,500
gain on redemption 25.081,98
bonds payable 130,500.00 debit
premium on bp 13,681.98 debit
interest expense 17,400.00 debit
gain on redemption 25,081.98 credit
cash 136,500.00 credit
Now, we solve for Dec 31st, 2021 entry.
bonds payable: 435,000 - 130,500 = 304,500
premium: 45,606 - 13,681.98 = 31.924,02
interest expense:
(304,500 + 31,924.02) x 0.04 = 13,456.96
cash outlay:
304,500 x 0.06 = 18,270
amortization 18,270 - 13,456.96 = 4,813.04
Answer:
Cost per equivalent unit = 4.015 per unit
Explanation:
Under the weighted average method of valuation, to account for completed units, it is assumed that the entire degree of work required is done in the period under consideration. So there is no separation of the completed units into opening inventory and fully worked.
Cost per equivalent unit = cost / total equivalent units
To determine the conversion cost per equivalent unit, we follow the steps below
Step 1
Determine the total equivalent units
Items units Equivalent units
Completed units 144,000 144,000× 100% 144,000
Closing inventory 31,500 31,500 × 60% = 18900
Total equivalent unit 162,900
Step 2
Calculate cost per equivalent unit
Cost per equivalent unit = Total conversion cost/Total equivalent units
= (602,150+ 51,850)/162,900 units
= 4.015 per units
Answer:
$133,000
Explanation:
According to the historical cost principle, the assets should be recorded at the purchase price or the acquisition cost. In this, no other cost should be recorded like assessed value, land improvements, etc
Since in the given question the Gallatin accepted the seller counter offer i.e. $133,000 so the same is to be presented in the financial statements
hence, the land should be recorded at $133,000