What was the pinckney's treaty??

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: The Pinckney's treaty a.k.a the treaty of San Lorenzo was a treaty signed on October 27 1795 that made the US and Spain allies. It was signed in San Lorenzo de El Escorial.

Related Questions

How do propaganda war films change over time and how do they affect society?
The "New Immigration" to the United States in the late-nineteenth century refers to the increased numbers of people arriving from
What occurred during the Columbian Exchange?A.People from Africa were brought to Europe. B.Millions of American Indians died of disease. C.Horses and cattle went from Africa to Europe.D.Potatoes and tomatoes were introduced in the Americas.
What three options did Kennedy's staff consider as a response to Soviet missiles headed to Cuba? Sink any Soviet transports. Take out all the missile sites. Attack Russia through Berlin. Conduct a military invasion. Assassinate Cuba's Fidel Castro. Run a blockade or quarantine.
7. What religious practice did the Inca, Aztec, and Maya have in common?A. worshipping only one god B. reading books about the gods C. going to the temple on Sundays D. offering sacrifices to the gods

How did the United States’ approach regarding the Japanese economy shift during the Korean War?a.It focused on growth rather than reform.
b. It focused on reform rather than growth.
c. It focused on reform rather than stabilization.
d. It focused on stabilization rather than decline.

Answers

I choose letter a.It focused on growth rather than reform. The United States needed a supply line during the Korean War and Japan was a suitable location for such a purpose. They helped boost the economy which focused on growth. This helped Japan recover from World War II and later elevated its economy during the sixties.

Answer:

A) it focused on growth rather than reform

Explanation:

just took the quiz

What did Herbert Hoover do to help Americans survive the Depression?

Answers

Herbert Hoover did surprisingly little to help Americans survive the Depression, since he did not believe in a great amount of government intervention in the economy. Instead, he relied on private companies and charities to provide relief.

Answer:

He urged local governments to create jobs.

Explanation:

Quizlet

Which statement best describes what happened when Constantine tried to establish "New Rome"?'

Answers

The statement that best describes what happened when Constantine tried to establish New Rome is:
He was successful in building a new political center in the East, unified by the Christian religion.

Explanation:

He brought the geographical region beneath his management and established an empire in Italy that prospered. He wasn't ready to establish "New Rome" as a result of Western Rome's armies were too robust and maintained management. He was overthrown by an overseas blue blood, and his new empire broken beneath the prince's poor leadership. He was thriving in building a brand new political center within the East, unified by the religious belief.

When Constantine tried to establish "New Rome," he was successful in building a new political center in the East, unified by the Christian religion.

New Rome was a name given to the new city that the Roman Emperor Constantine created. The city was called Byzantium prior to his rededication, and as Constantinople thereafter.

Constantinople was the capital city of the Roman Empire of the Byzantine Empire.

How long was the Hundred Years’ War?

Answers

the Hundred Years' War was a long struggle between England and France over succession to the French throne. It lasted from 1337 to 1453, so it might more accurately be called the "116 Years' War."

The POTUS would like Congress to pass an appropriations (tax) bill. In which chamber/house of Congress does the bill need to begin?Group of answer choices

Either chamber

Senate

neither chamber

House of Representatives

Answers

Answer:

House of Representatives.

Explanation:

Then it goes to the senate.

Answer:

Correct me if im wrong but I think its the House of Representatives

Explanation:

The constitution states that all bills for rasing revenues shall begin in the House. Revenue is tax.

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless __________.

Answers

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona [1966], nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they have been advised of their rights. During the case of Miranda versus Arizona, it was established that statements made during interogation by defendants in the police station will be acceptable in courts duriing trials only if the prosecution can show evidence that the defendant was informed of the right to talk to his or her lawyer before and during questioning and of the right against self incrimination before police questioning. And the prosecution should also be able to demonstrate that the defendant understand these rights but voluntarily waived them.

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless they are informed about their rights.

Further Explanation:

The decision of the “Miranda versus Arizona” stated that the individuals who are arrested must be notified about their “constitutional rights”, being arrested or questioned. As per the decision, the 5th Amendment act prohibits prosecutors from using suspect speech made at the time of custody and questioning. It is individuals’ legal right to consult an attorney before being interrogated.

The case was considered a drastic change in the “American Criminal law” as it altered the extended the importance of the 5th Amendment. Earlier, it was considered that the act will protect the citizens against the obligation to contempt and confess in the court and after the decision; it became mandatory to inform individuals about their rights. This procedure also referred to as Miranda warning and oral notifications given to the arrestee during custody.

Learn More:

1. in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had

brainly.com/question/2816742

2. Though the outcomes of the Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.

brainly.com/question/1804110

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona

Subject: History

Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona, constitutional rights, amendment, custody, legal right, attorney, criminal law, court

Other Questions

The Khmer Rouge is a Communist force associated with the country of

Chart is worth 6 pointsMitosisMeiosisDefine the processWhat is the purpose of this type of division? (growth and repair or production of gametes)Where in the body, does it occur? (ex. all body cells or reproductive organs)Type of cell produced? (Ex. an exact copy or genetically diverse cells)Are daughter cells haploid or diploid? (ex. n or 2n)Involves crossing over and recombination of genes? (yes or no)Number of divisions? (1x or 2x)Number of cells produced (2 or 4)In human cells, the final chromosome number

Desertification is the degradation of land in arid and dry sub-humid areas, but is not occurring in Africa yet.true false

Besides connecting the eastern United States with the western United States, the Transcontinental Railroad was also instrumental in A) driving a gap through the Confederate territories. B) bringing in immigrants from Ireland and China. Eliminate C) getting California admitted as a state. D) ending the Reconstruction Era.