The Great Compromise resolved the dispute about representation by creating balance by blending the Virginia and New Jersey plans. The Great Compromise was an arrangement made between small and large states concerning how much power the states in the United States Constitution.
EXPLANATION:
The Great Compromise, so-called Connecticut Compromise or the Great Compromise of 1787 or the Sherman Compromise, was an arrangement made between small and large states that partially described the representation each state would have under the United States Constitution and in the legislature. It happened in 1787.
The Connecticut compromise caused by an argument among delegates about how each state could have representation in Congress. The Great Compromise directed to the establishment of a two-chambered Congress. It also made the House of Representatives which was classified by the population of a state. The agreement maintains a bicameral legislature.
However, the upper house must change to lodge two senators to represent each state. The agreement reshapes the structure of the American government which balances high-populated states and their demands while at the moment considering the less-populated state and their concerns.
The most important effect of the Great Compromise was a change in the structure of the American Government. The Great Compromise of 1787 provided greater state representation in the lower house based on population, and smaller states gained equal representation in the upper house.
LEARN MORE:
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• In a paragraph, analyze the Great Compromise during the Constitutional Convention. What problem did it solve? What were the alternatives? brainly.com/question/13069672
KEYWORDS : Great Compromise, Representation,
Subject : Social Studies
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : Great Compromise
The Great Compromise resolved the dispute about representation by proposing a bicameral congress with equal representation in the Senate and representation based on population in the House of Representatives.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, resolved the dispute about representation by proposing a bicameral congress with different apportionment methods in each house. The upper house, the Senate, would have equal representation with two members from each state, satisfying the small states. The lower house, the House of Representatives, would have representation based on the population of each state, addressing the concerns of the large states.
#SPJ6
Answer:
By the time of Kublai's death in 1294, the Mongol Empire had fractured into four separate empires, or khanates. This weakness allowed the Han Chinese Ming Dynasty to take control in 1368, while Russian princes also slowly developed independence over the 14th and 15th centuries, and the Mongol Empire finally dissolved.
Explanation:
Answer: Because native americans had no contact with domesticated animals
b. interviews
c. objective tests
d. projective tests
Answer:a, observations
Explanation:
They believe that people are changed by their surrounding environment and to see if there are any changes one has to observe their behaviours.
Behaviorists prefer assessment through option A) observation because it aligns with their focus on measurable behaviors. This preference stands in contrast to using self-report inventories or projective tests that explore internal thoughts and feelings which are less observable.
To assess personality, behaviorists prefer option A) observation. Behaviorists focus on observable and measurable behaviors rather than internal thoughts and feelings. When assessing personalities, behaviorists often employ observational techniques because they are direct methods of assessing how individuals interact with their environment.
While there are various tools to evaluate personality, such as the self-report inventory, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), these are not typically used by behaviorists. On the other hand, projective tests like the Rorschach Inkblot Test or the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) assess unconscious processes and are also not primary methods used by behaviorists who prefer clear, observable data.
In terms of research techniques, someone like a symbolic interactionist would likely use participant observation, whereas a personality psychologist may be interested in employing various methods, such as personality assessments, to determine the best employee fit for a job.
#SPJ3