A useful definition of personal freedom in america would be to

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: You have the right to do what ever you please as long as you comply with the laws of the country. 
Answer 2
Answer:

My problem is:

A useful definition of personal freedom in America would be to __________.

A. do anything you want, as long as it feels good

B. do anything you want, as long as you can afford it

C. make your own decisions, as long as those choices do not interfere with anyone else's rights

D. take orders without asking questions


Related Questions

Unlike previous federal policies, President Grants "peace policy" attempted to?A:Relocate with settlers to the EastB:Provide fair and kind treatment to the tribesC:Provide shelter for displaced tribesD:Relocate tribes to their Native Lands.
The main function of the Legislative Branch is toa. create the law.b. carry out the law.c. interpret the law.d. apply the law.
L’Enfant’s temper caused him to get fired in 1792
Easy question :3What resulted from the French and Indian War?Britain gave Canada to France.Britain continued to send settlers west of the Appalachian Mountains.Britain gave Native Americans land in New England.Britain paid the war debt by taxing American colonists.
At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Madison drafted the plan presented by Virginia Governor Randolph, and William Patterson of _______ presented a plan that was similar to the Articles of Confederation. A. Pennsylvania B. Massachusetts C. South Carolina D. New Jersey

What form of government is the US federal government?A.totalitarian
B.unitary
C.direct democracy
D.indirect democracy

Answers

The form of US Federal government is Indirect Democracy. The form of indirect democracy is called republic or representative democracy. Democracy is a government system where every people is the legitimate member of a country, who can give their idea and opinion to the country. The Indirect Democracy is a democracy government system, where the people can give their opinion through the representatives. The representatives are several people elected by the people.

Answer:

indirect democarcy

Explanation:

Supporters of the atomic bomb argued against the idea that the US should not use the bomb against Japan by.... A) suggesting the destruction would not be any greater than at Pearl Harbor. B) noting the bomb would mainly destroy buildings rather than kill people C) suggesting the bomb would only be used on important military targets. D) noting that firebombing had already caused extensive damage in Japan.

Answers

Answer: D) noting that firebombing had already caused extensive damage in Japan.

Close to the end of World War II, the United States detonated two nuclear weapons over Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945), two Japanese cities. The United States dropped the bombs after obtaining the consent of the United Kingdom. The two bombings killed 129,000-226,000 people, mostly civilians.

Before the atomic bombs, the allies had already conducted many air raids on Japan. Strategic bombing raids began in June 1944 and continued until the end of the war. These attacks destroyed about 67 Japanese cities. These extensive attacks and the damage they had caused were some of the main arguments used by supporters of the atomic bomb.

However, during the planning of the nuclear attacks, the Air Forces were looking for cities that had not been damaged extensively by the raids, as they believed this would make the assessment of the damage more accurate.




The answer is D.

From 1944 to 1945, the Allied forces implemented strategic bombing raids in Japan. The casualties of Japanese citizens was between 241,000 and 900,000. By the time the United States dropped the atomic bombs, Japan was severely injured from this firebombing. 

______ is a document that gives us firsthand historical information

Answers

Answer:

Primary Source.

Explanation:

In the study of history as an academic discipline, primary source constitute the raw material of history. They include all the documents, testimonies, recordings or objects that convey significant information regarding the events that have taken place, especially in the past. Within them, and considering the value that others also have, written sources are the basic support for building history.

The historian works historical sources to obtain from them as much information as possible. It must also attend to its variety, making an appropriate selection of them.

As a result of the introduction of mass transit in cities?:A. working-class neighborhoods were broken apart.
B. different social groups no longer lived close together.
C. more mixed-use areas consisting of residences, shops, and factories emerged.
D. human resources were drawn inward toward the central city.

Answers

The correct answer is letter D. human resources were drawn inward toward the central city. As a result of the introduction of mass transit in cities, human resources were drawn inward toward the central city. It is easier to transfer from one place to the other and it's very effective most especially to working people.

Examples and Non Examples of Sovereignty

Answers

Example of sovereignty: the power of a king to rule his people.

Non sovereignty: vectoring a bill, power given to the president.

Final answer:

Sovereignty refers to the absolute power and authority of a state to govern itself without outside interference. An example is the self-governance of the United States. A non-example is the German occupation of Poland during World War 2 where Poland lost its ability to self-govern.

Explanation:

Sovereignty refers to the absolute power and autonomy of a national government to govern its territory and people, irrespective of outside intervention. It is a key principle in international law and politics. Sovereignty can be exercised in several ways, including making laws, enforcing laws, and interpreting laws.

For instance, the United States exhibits sovereignty by self-governance, including creating its laws, determining foreign policy, and issuing currency without external interference. Contrastingly, an example of a situation that does not represent sovereignty is when a country is invaded by another nation and comes under foreign control, such as the German occupation of Poland during World War II. In this case, Poland lost its sovereignty when their ability to self-govern was overtaken by German forces.

Sovereignty can also be partially relinquished through international agreements. For example, members of the European Union have agreed to follow certain economic and political guidelines despite their national sovereignty. Nevertheless, they maintain their inherent sovereignty as it can be exerted should they decide to leave the EU and regain full control over their national affairs.

Learn more about Sovereignty here:

brainly.com/question/34315522

#SPJ2

What is the relationship between return and risk? *a. Investments with high returns are lower risk.
b. Investments with low risk have lower returns.
c. Investments with low returns are higher risk.
d. There is no relationship between return and risk

Answers

Answer:

b. Investments with low risk have lower returns.  

Explanation:

If you're eyeing the market and looking for applications with above-average returns, it's good to stay tuned for a fundamental point: risk and return!

That's right: the relationship between risk and return is direct. In other words, it is impossible to make a lot of money in the stock market at low risk! So the obvious conclusion could be: to earn more, just increase the risk. So in the perfect world, you would choose the desired risk and receive the expected return.

First, you have to keep in mind that in order to attract investments, higher risk assets need to offer the possibility of higher returns. Then, it is essential to know that the stock market does not have a ready solution for the risk / return ratio, since it presents a number of variables as fundamentals and flows. In this way, there is no guarantee of earnings. To know the risk of a particular action, it is essential to know your risk and return history. Thus, you can evaluate the performance of the investment.

Final answer:

The relationship between return and risk in investments often follows the principle of risk-return tradeoff, meaning higher potential returns typically come with higher risk. Investors with low risk tolerance are likely to choose lower-return investments, while those with higher risk tolerance may pursue investments with the potential for higher returns.

Explanation:

In the world of investing, the correlation between return and risk typically follows one principle: the higher the potential return, the higher the risk. This relationship is often referred to as the risk-return tradeoff. This means the option b, 'Investments with low risk have lower returns' is correct, as investors who are risk-averse might choose investments with lower returns due to the associated lower level of risk.

On the other hand, investors willing to take on more risk often pursue investments with the potential for higher returns. However, it’s important to note that a higher potential return doesn’t guarantee an actual higher return. Therefore, always be sure to consider your own risk tolerance before making investment decisions.

Learn more about Risk-Return Tradeoff here:

brainly.com/question/34895373

#SPJ6