The text below was written in 1918:"I listened to all that was said in this court in support and justification of this prosecution, but my mind remains unchanged. I look upon the Espionage Law as a despotic enactment in flagrant conflict with democratic principles and with the spirit of free institutions…

Your Honor, I have stated in this court that I am opposed to the social system in which we live; that I believe in a fundamental change—but if possible by peaceable and orderly means…"

Why does Eugene Debs reject the prosecution's arguments in support of the Espionage Act?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. Below are the choices that can be found elsewhere. the answer will be C. I hope it helps. 

A. He stands in opposition to the current political system.
B. He denies being in violation of the Espionage Act.
C .He believes that the Espionage Act is contradictory to democratic principles and freedom.
D. He believes that his actions were justified based on his kinship with all living beings.

Answer 2
Answer:

Eugene Debs was adamant in rejecting those arguments because he considered them a violation to the 1st amendment of the Bill of Rights that provide citizens the right of free speech.

Debs who was a socialist at that time, spoke out against USA actions in World War I, believing that change and progress could be achieved by using peaceful proceedings; and pondered the espionage law as a repressive act in conflict with democratic ideas.


Related Questions

What authority does Semir Osmanagic have to declare this hill a Pyramid? Is he a trained archaeologist? Who has independently confirmed his claims?
Was Benjamin Franklin a vegan?
In his "Truman Doctrine" the U.S. president believed the way to "contain" Soviet expansion would be byfinancially supporting the free nations of the world who are feeling the pressure to become communists andjoin the Soviet's Warsaw Alliance.Why do you think Great Britain and France received the most financial aid?
The problems caused by the showed theFounders the need for a strong executive to respond to problems, enforce laws, and carry out theacts of Congress.
Who was free in northern Carolina?everyoneonly the pooronly the rich

The Monroe doctrine promised that the United States would

Answers

Answer: The Answer Is A

Explanation:

I hope this is right! :)

__________ is frequency misused and confused with "civil war." pol 300

Answers

revolution The difference between the two is that a revolution is when the population of one state rise against what the feel as an oppressive regime. A revolution is led often by the popular mandate and seeks change in government. a civil war on the hand refers to the situation where two organized factions.




Write a simple conclusion about Mesopotamia and Egypt. (15 points) 1-5 sentences 5 sentences mark as brainiest.

Answers

Mesopotamia and Egypt have significant similarities and differences that impact their societies.  Both were located along flood basis of major rivers which characterized the economy of their society. Mesopotamia was in turmoil due to the harsh climate and the fact that the Tigris and Euphrates rivers flooded irregularly creating a rather considerate threat to their environment.  Egypt, on the other hand, was centered on the dependable Nile, which provided a rich and fertile soil with plenty of agricultural wealth and travel for trade.  In regards to the political structure, Mesopotamia had no unification of government; however, Egypt attempted to unify with two different states the Upper and Lower sections allowing significance in the longevity of this civilization to ensure the free flow of traffic on the Nile.

Sam Houston was elected the 1st President of the Republic of Texas – which two men did he defeat in that election?​

Answers

Houston won the election in a landslide, carrying 77% of the vote to Smith's 13% and Austin's 10%. Mirabeau Lamar was elected vice president by a majority of 2,699 votes.

What does Carnegie mean when he writes that “The ‘good old times’ were not good old times” (Foner 33)?

Answers

Answer:

It means that the old times weren't as good as the phrase 'the good old times' made it seem.

explanation:

What Andrew Carnegie meant by this is that although we may use the phrase

“The ‘good old times’, those times were not really good times. This is because things were not clearly as good as it is today compared to those times. Going back to those times or old conditions would be disastrous as the good old times were not quite as civilized as we have it today.

From the speech from which he said these words, he said neither master nor servant were as well situated as they are today. This means that life wasn't very easy or comfortable in the old times compared to today.

Small foreshocks that precede a major earthquake can occur _____.

Answers

Answer:

Days or years before the major earthquake.

Explanation:

The foreshocks always come before the major earthquake. They can appear only a single day before it, weeks, months, or even years. It is a nice indicator that something bigger is coming, so if people are wary enough they can avoid the devastating effects of the major seismic activity afterwards.

For example, we can take the foreshocks and the major earthquake in Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, in the summer of 2016, where the foreshocks started about two months earlier, and they were present every day for those two months, slightly increasing in intensity, until the major earthquake of 6.9 magnitude according to the Richter scale came.

Glad I could help!!