Which pair of sentences can be combined using a conjunction? A.
Alison meant to call home before she left the party. She forgot.


B.
Mother can't wait for the peonies to bloom. She works in the city.


C.
Read this book. What's on TV tonight?


D.
We have to pack for our trip. Don't trip on the stairs!

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: A. They can be combined like so:
Allison meant to call home before she left the party, but she forgot.

Related Questions

Give 3 points on why social networking sites have a negative impact on youths
are the underlined words to run, to sing, to school, to college, to listen an infinitive or prepositional phrase​
What is the answer to this the king is just a ruler what is the adverb in that sentence
The poem as a whole is comparing a train to a horse. Which words from the poembest support this conclusion? A "neigh"and"stable"B"crawl" and "hooting"C "lick" and "feed"D "mountains" and "roads"
What is the appositive in this sentence? Coach Smith has special exercises for us pitchers.A.usB.CoachC.pitchersD.exercises

Which word correctly completes the sentence? She was standing __________ a group of tourists.

A.
between

B.
among

Answers

She is standing BETWEEN a group of tourists. This shows the attachment between her and the tourists.


She was standing among a group of tourist.

Among is used to suggest a sense of being a part of or surrounded by or included in something else.

Hope this helps. :)

In the book Anne of Green Gables what does Matthew say about Mrs. Blewett?

Answers

Matthew said this, and I quote, about Mrs. Blewett: "I wouldn't give a dog I liked to that Blewett woman".
I haven't read the book, but I assume he isn't that fond of this woman.

Matthew told Marilla he wouldn't give a dog he liked to Matilda Blewett.

Alex walked all the away to the zoo from his home. He has not done so again.

Answers

Only once Alex walked all the way to the zoo from his home.

The original sentences read, "Alex walked all the way to the zoo from his home. He has not done so again." The last sentence implies Alex has only done this once.

The new sentence can be "Only once has Alex walked from his home to the zoo." The meaning of the sentence(s) has not changed.

What is Walt Whitman’s poem celebrating about people?

Answers

Walt Whitman's poem celebrating about people is "Song of Myself."

Walt Whitman in his poem “Song of Myself” prohibits himself from singing the songs of war, rage, and journeys and instead sings the song of himself as the subject of his poem. The poem deals about his journey and experience in this world. There are two main characters in his poem, which are 'I' and 'you.' Whitman speaks about the grass which is the symbol of democracy. He says that the grass of democracy feeds itself on the bodies of the dead. In the poem Whitman used stanzas of varying length and the topic of his poem changed with change in stanzas.

Answer: The importance and individuality of each American and his or her job.

Explanation:

HEELPPP ME PLS WILL GIIVE YOU BRAINLIESST Expand the following sentence by adding your own choice of adjectives or adverbs. Write the expanded sentence in the paragraph box.

The man trudged home from a day at work.

Answers

Answer:The Industrious man trudged home after, an ambitious day at work.

When I began working at this marketing job, I used to drive past the same homeless man every day. He stood at the corner of Twelfth Street and Industrial Boulevard, just before the left turn into the private road to my office complex, and held up a brown cardboard sign that read, “Anything Helps.” I didn’t know how to respond to him. Most people didn’t respond at all but drove right past him. Even if the red light stopped them at the very corner, directly alongside him, they didn’t turn their gaze in his direction, much less reach into their pockets for a dollar bill. And yet, he made a point of smiling and nodding at every driver in the line of cars and sometimes wishing them good day. One spring morning, many weeks after he’d first taken over the corner, a day when I was first in the line of stopped cars, I happened to glance to my left and saw that he was giving me a smile and a nod. “Have a good one,” he said. Flustered, I managed to falter out the words, “You too.” The light changed, and I drove off. Immediately, I felt guilty for not giving him some money, for he’d been kind toward me, had treated me as a fellow human being, despite the fact that I’d completely spurned him. So the next time I was stopped at that light, I rolled down my window and extended my hand with a dollar in it. From that point on, I gave him a dollar every time I happened to be caught at that red light, and he swiftly came to recognize me. He’d walk over to my car with a big smile of comradeship and anticipation, and in exchange for the dollar, he’d entertain me with some observation about human quirks or some bit of news about how he’d been surviving over the past twenty-four hours. We knew each other, I felt, even if it was only in a limited way. “You shouldn’t do that,” my friend Janna told me severely a couple of months later. People who gave money to panhandlers were supporting them in destructive lifestyles rather than encouraging them to become productive, Janna said, and I believed her because she was a social worker at a charity and wanted to benefit the homeless in ways that were genuinely constructive, not just ways for some middle-class driver to fool himself into feeling virtuous. So I changed my morning commuting route and began entering the office complex from the other side. But from the beginning, I felt bad about avoiding him; I felt I had bowed to peer pressure, had shown the opposite of courage, and was depriving myself of an opportunity to make a small sacrifice that would make someone happy. It hadn’t even been a sacrifice, I realized, because giving the man that insignificant (for me) sum had pleased me as well as him. The next day, I drove to work on my original route, which was quicker anyway, and looked forward to stopping next to him and exchanging a friendly pleasantry or two. But he wasn’t there. He wasn’t there the next day, either, and now that autumn and winter have come and gone, I can surmise fairly confidently that he’s never coming back. Maybe he’s migrated to some place with nicer weather. Or maybe something has happened to him that people like me wouldn’t want to think about. I don’t know what I’ll do when a different homeless person discovers that this corner is unoccupied. Which theme can be most reasonably inferred from this story? Good intentions do not necessarily lead to wisdom. Generosity is always the best policy. People are not always what they first appear to be. Knowledge is power, and money is power, too.

Answers

The theme that infers this story is that generosity is always the best policy. The correct option is b.

What is generosity?

The modern English word “generosity” derives from the Latin word generōsus, which means “of noble birth,” which itself was passed down to English through the Old French word Genereux.

During the 17th Century, however, the meaning and use of the word began to change. Generosity came increasingly to identify not literal family heritage but a nobility of spirit thought to be associated with high birth, that is, with various admirable qualities that could now vary from person to person, depending not on family history but on whether a person possessed the qualities. Then, during the 18th Century, the meaning of “generosity” continued to evolve in directions denoting the more specific, contemporary meaning of munificence, open-handedness, and liberality in the giving of money and possessions to others.

This etymological genealogy tells us that the word “generosity” that we inherit and use today entails certain historical associations.

Learn more about generosity, here:

brainly.com/question/28845688

#SPJ2

Answer:

To never trust everybody.

Explanation:

You never know how its going to be in the end results.