Answer:
wealth or are intellectually superior.
Explanation:
From page 11 of Literary Theory by Terry Eagleton (U of Minnesota P, 1996).
Student sample
Eagleton foolishly considers Shakespeare “no more valuable than much present-day graffiti” (11).
a)OK
b)Unacceptable
which one is correct option
Explanation:
This post will provide the answers for the other questions posted (please see the included links for information).
According to the formatting guidelines under the Modern Language Association (MLA) style of writing, in-text citations must include the author'slast name and page number of any paraphrased or directly-quoted text. It is essential to give credit to the source of material or literary work in our writing, as it establishes our credibility as a writer.
Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096982
Eagleton foolishly considers Shakespeare “no more valuable than much present-day graffiti” (11).
This is an acceptable citation since the student included the author's last name and the page number in his direct quotation. However, the student should have used an ellipsis (...) at the beginning of his direct quotation. The purpose of adding an ellipsis is to let the reader know that the quoted text is a phrase, or a sub-part of a complete text. The correct formatting is as follows:
Eagleton foolishly considers Shakespeare “... no more valuable than much present-day graffiti” (11).
Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096976
As Eagleton observes, “value” is a transitory word that describes something appreciated by particular people in particular times and places, judged by certain standards for certain reasons (11).
This is not an acceptable citation. The paraphrased text closely resembles the source, despite using different words. Regardless of citing his source, the student essentially plagiarized Eagleton's text. The purpose of paraphrasing text is to convey the author's ideas using your own words. A great way to prevent plagiarism is to ask oneself, "How can I explain my understanding of Eagleton's text to others?"
Student sample: brainly.com/question/26096979
As Eagleton points out, the value of a work of literature changes depending on its audience—literary value is a subjective idea, not a fixed one (11).
This is an acceptable citation. The student succinctly used his own words in expressing how he understood the author's text, without closely resembling the original source. He also provided the page number of the paraphrased text.
O a. There was a chance not many people would sign.
b. It was an agreement with King George III.
O c. Those who signed belonged to no country.
O d. Britain viewed those who signed as traitors.
Explanation:
Signing this document was dangerous. To sign the Declaration of Independence meant that the signers were living on borrowed time. But, freedom meant sacrifice, even the sacrifice of their lives. So, even with the threat of death hanging over their heads, they signed this marvelous and bold document.
Answer:
The Royalists and the Roundheads.
Explanation:
The English Civil War of 1642-1645 was a series of civil wars between Parliamentarians and Royalists. The Parliamentarians were also called "Roundheads," while the Royalists were also called "Cavaliers." The conflict arose because of the different opinions that these people had when it came to the way in which England should be governed. The war ended with the Parliamentarian victory at the Battle of Worcester on September 3, 1651.
Parliamentarians ("Roundheads") and Royalists ("Cavaliers") found against each other in the civil war of 1642-1645.
Roundheads supported the Parliament of England during the English Civil War which lasted from 1641 to 1652. Roundheads were Parliamentarians, who fought against King Charles I of England and his supporters, called the Cavaliers or Royalists, who claimed rule by absolute monarchy and the principle of the 'divine right of kings'. The Roundhead party wanted the Parliament to have supreme control over executive administration of the country.
16) I couldn't see the teacher because he
before I arrived the school.
A) had left
B) has left
C) left
D) was leaving
17) He was very tired because he
the bags upstairs.
A) have carried
B) had carried
C) carried
D) has carried
18) He asked me to give his book back but I
B) had lost
C) was lost
A) have lost
D) lost
19) She
all of the questions in the exam because she had studied very well.
C) answer
D) answered
A) answering
B) answers
20) When I arrived the church was empty. Everybody
D) was gone
B) has gone
C) had gone
A) had been gone
Answer:
16. A
17. C
18. B
19. D
20. C
to inform readers about the differences between three
military conflicts
to persuade readers of the seriousness of the
American Civil War
to entertain readers with tales from behind the lines of
battle
to encourage readers to visit battlegrounds in
Appomattox, Virginia
To persuade readers of the seriousness of the American Civil War is the author's primary purpose for including this detail. Hence, option B is correct.
Using evidence helps convince the reader that the author is informed and that the argument is more sound or trustworthy. Statistics, professional opinions, research findings, and anecdotal evidence can all be used to support a position.
When writing to persuade, make an effort to persuade the reader to share your point of view. Non-fiction persuasive writing might take the shape of a speech, a letter, an advertisement, or even an article in a magazine. people can use a variety of approaches to strengthen your writing's persuasiveness.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about evidence persuading a reader, click here:
#SPJ5
Answer:
B to persuade readers of the seriousness of the American Civil War
Explantion:
got it right on edge
Answer:
to inconvenience oneself
Explanation:
Remember, the phrase "Get under your skin" is an idiomatic expression. Since idioms are not to be taken for their literal meanings, we could infer this saying to mean;
1. someone purposefully inconveniences himself to fulfill an objective.
2. to control or redirect one's self even though the individual resent doing so at first.