HISTORY HIGH SCHOOL

How did the Reformation contribute to the birth of the Enlightenment? A. it challenged the traditional authority of the Church. B. it encouraged observation, hypothesis, and experimentation. C. it rejected claims of corruption in the Church. D. it promoted Biblical text as the only source of knowledge

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: A. it challenged the traditional authority of the Church.

The Reformation is usually believed to have started with the publication of the Ninety-five Theses by Martin Luther in 1517. It was a movement that caused a schism in Western Christianity and gave rise to denominations such as Calvinist, Lutheran, Reformed, Anglican, Anabaptist, Unitarian, etc. The Protestant Reformation was also significant because it challenged the authority of the Church in Europe. Because of this, it was a detonator for the birth of Enlightenment.
Answer 2
Answer:

Reformation contribute to the birth of the Enlightenment by challenging the traditional authority of the Church.

What is reformation?

Reformation is to rebrand or reshape what has been in existence.

It lead to the change that was visible in some of the nations of the world making it enviable.

Reformation starts with a reformer

Therefore, Reformation contribute to the birth of the Enlightenment by challenging the traditional authority of the Church.

Learn more about reformer below

brainly.com/question/1175505

#SPJ5

Related Questions

What was the state of the economy during the 1992 presidential elections
What is the purpose of the consumer price index?a. To determine the amount of tax revenues the government will collectb. To encourage employers to hire more workersc. To measure changes in pricesd. To project innovations in manufacturing
which of the following statements is most accurate regarding America's political climate between 1876 and 1896
There were widespread agrarian societies during the _______ era.
Which of the following statements is true regarding French colonialism in Southeast Asia in the late 19th century?

1. Truman wanted to avoid an invasion of Japan because he believed that (1 point)A) Japan's culture would be ruined.
B) Japanese losses would be heavy.
C) Americans would suffer heavy losses.
D) the Japanese would use the atomic bomb.

2. Which country was referred to as the "soft underbelly" of Europe by Winston Churchill? (1 point)
A) Spain
B) Italy
C) Turkey
D) Poland

Answers

The answer to the question is C. Truman felt that the Americans would suffer from heavy losses with an invasion. Eventually, a strategy was put in place. 

Italy was the country that was referred to as the "soft underbelly" of Europe by Winston Churchill. This occurred during World War II. 

One of the contributing factors to America's initial decision to enter into World War I was the Zimmermann Note. What were the contents of this telegram sent from Germany? A.Germany's proposal that upon an alliance with Mexico, it would ensure the return of Mexican land lost to the United States. B. Germany's threat that upon a Mexican-American alliance, it would no longer engage in trade activities with Mexico. C. Germany's insistence that the Mexican government refuse to assist the Allies with financial or military aid. D. Germany's war secrets promised to the Mexican government aft

Answers

The correct answer is A) Germany's proposal that upon an alliance with Mexico, it would ensure the return of Mexican land lost to the US.

Germany tried to convince Mexico to join them by using Mexico's resentment towards the US. After the Mexican-American War, Mexico gave up 2/3rds of its land in what is known as the Mexican Cession. The Mexican Cession resulted in the US getting a significant amount of land from Mexico. This includes territories such as California, Arizona, and Utah.

The land lost in the Mexican Cession was the land that Germany was referring to in the Zimmerman Telegram. Getting this land back would restore Mexico's territory back to its prewar size.

A.  Germany's proposal that upon an alliance with Mexico, it would ensure the return of Mexican land lost to the United States.

How did the Constitution overcome the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation?

Answers

The main way in which the Constitution overcame the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation was that it made the central government much stronger by giving a great deal of power to the legislative branch, which now had power to make laws that could overcome individual state laws.

What was a principal reason for the success of European colonialism in Asia in the late 1800s?

Answers

the principle reason was the manufacturing and sale of opium

Which president was criticized for pardoning Nixon? Ronald Reagan
Jimmy Carter
Gerald Ford
George H.W. Bush

Answers

The correct answer is C) Gerald Ford.

The president that was criticized for pardoning Nixon was Gerald Ford.

After Richard Nixon resigned due to the Watergate Scandal, and avoid impeachment by the US Congress, Gerald Ford became the 38th President of the United States. His administration started in August 1974. At that moment, many citizens thought that Ford would exert an exemplary punishment against Nixon for all the things he did, but that was not the case. Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon for all the crimes committed. Some analysts considered that the pardon was part of the negotiations to get Ford the Presidency.

Gerald Ford is who it is 

How were these pseudo-scientific theories used to justify racist policies and imperialist expansion

Answers

since you didn't specify one, I'll give you a little challenge: global climate change. 

yes...this is not a "historical" answer, but please bear with me as you may learn something quite a bit more useful than a history lesson... 

climate change is a very trendy topic now....and many of its proponents are absolutely convinced of its "science".. 

...however, for many this absoute faith in the "science" translates all-too-easily into an absolute faith in the righteousness of the proposed "solutions"... 

...for example, president obama recently celebrated his participation in a "landmark" international accord to combat climate change... many of his supporters lauded him for "taking a stand against global corporations and their exploitation of people and natural resources..." 

great.... right? 

this agreement contained two provisions that seemingly went unnoticed.... first, nations considered "developing" will not have to comply with the strict emmisions restrictions... second, all nations are required to designate a certain percentage of their natural forests & jungles as untouchable "preserves." 

sounds good.... right? please think it through... 

the agreement gives these nations the authority to displace any indigenous peoples who just happen to call those "preserves" home... over a million people are expected to be kicked off their ancestral lands in DR Congo alone. 

keep in mind that most of these people will be illiterate hunter-gatherers ... how do you think they will manage to support themselves? 

guess what? because those nations will not be required to meet environmental standards, a bunch of new factories, mines and refineries are sure to open up there....and they'll have all the cheap labor they could ever need! Yay! 

and guess who owns those businesses? that's right, mega-corporations...guess who those corporations support? that's right... the very politicians who signed the climate change deal! 

so you were asking about how "pseudo science" supports/justifies exploitation and imperialism? well....as the old rhyme goes: the wheels on the bus keep on going 'round and 'round... don't they?
Other Questions
During the Paris peace talks, more nations favored a just peace than a peace of vengeance. true false
what was one major reason given by Adolf Hitler to justify his demand for additional territory between 1936 and 1939
Without George Westinghouse’s invention, what aspect of life most likely would be impacted? affordability of automobiles efficient travel by airplane communication by telephone delivery of electricity use of gas masks for safety
The great industrialists of the late nineteenth century praised unfettered free enterprise as they worked to eliminate competition. How can these apparently conflicting ideologies be reconciled?