Answer:
The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II aimed to:
b. Banned any new development of nuclear weapons
d. Managed to reduce the size of their nuclear arsenals
Explanation:
The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II or SALT II was the continuation of a previous attempt to regulate the nuclear arms threat between the US and the USSR. This happened during a period known as the Cold War where the world was divided into 2 blocks competing for power: the Capitalist block led by the US, and the Communist block led by the USSR.
Both countries had developed large arsenals of nuclear weapons and a war between them would've had catastrophic consequences. Talks between President Jimmy Carter and Premier Brezhnev began in November 1974. They agreed to: limit the size of their nuclear arsenals, limit the development of new weapons, and limit the deployment of new offensive weapons.
The treaty was signed on June 18, 1979.
The two things that are accomplished in Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II are Option B and D.
The Interim Agreement was intended to be replaced by the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks II (SALT II), however, SALT II did not become effective.
As part of SALT II, missiles were subject to numerical restrictions, bans on specific missiles, definitions of the systems included by the agreement, and verification clauses.
Hence options B and d are correct.
Learn more about Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II:
#SPJ5
Answer:
The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.
The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South. For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,
The Great Compromise proposed a bicameral congress to achieve political balance between small and large states, and the Three-Fifths Compromise counted three-fifths of enslaved persons for federal representation and taxation, giving extra political power to slave states. Both compromises significantly shaped the U.S. political landscape.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise had significant political implications for the formation and structure of the United States government. The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, proposed a bicameral congress. It assuaged the fears of both small and large states by allowing for variable representation: equal representation for each state in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives, based on state population.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, pertained to the issue of slavery and representation. Under this compromise, three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state's representation in the House of Representatives and its federal tax bill. This compromise effectively gave extra political power to slave states and had a profound impact on the political balance between the North and South. However, it also entrenched racial prejudice in the Constitution by implying that enslaved people were less than fully human.
Both compromises played a crucial role in shaping the U.S. political landscape. They determined how states were represented in the federal government and managed contentious issues like slavery, ensuring the preservation of the Union.
#SPJ3
the development of plantations that encouraged more Europeans to migrate to America for gainful employment
the arrival of the English preacher, George Whitefield who toured American colonies giving sermons
the correspondence between Britain’s Royal Society and the American Philosophical Society
the mechanistic view of the universe as postulated by the British scientist, Isaac Newton
Answer:
C. They became smaller,sharper,and more
Explanation:
In the Neolithic era, stone tools became smaller, sharper, and more diverse in their function. They also started incorporating art elements indicating societal hierarchy. These changes reflected the move from hunting-gathering lifestyles to established agricultural communities.
In the Neolithic era, stone tools underwent significant evolution, becoming more intricate, efficient, and specialized. The adoption of agriculture and establishment of permanent settlements during this period also influenced the tools development.
Necessarily, Neolithic tools became smaller, sharper, and more diverse in their function. This change is marked by the shift from the manufacture of rounded flakes to the construction of blade tools or blade tool industry. These blades were longer, thinner, and sharper, providing a much more efficient cutting edge than their predecessors. Relics such as Mousterian tools present examples of this transition, where tools became more specialized and were fashioned from stone flakes instead of cores. Flake tools were used extensively for a myriad of tasks from scraping leather, serving as spearheads to even being used in artistry and carving.
Notably, Neolithic tools also began to incorporate elements of art and decoration, signaling emerging social structures and status differences in these newer communities. Dental and skeletal studies give us evidence of the kinds of tasks these tools were used for, from daily cereal grinding to the processing of meats.
#SPJ6