By the 180s the Han court had grown weak, with debauched or disinterested emperors who lived only for amusement. Court eunuchs vied for power with the scholar-officials and army generals, at times even leading to massacres within the palace. In 189 CE, the warlord Dong Zhuo went as far to assassinate the 13-year-old Emperor Shao, putting Shao's younger brother on the throne instead.
But economically, the Han government had trouble collecting enough tax revenue to fund the court and to support the armies that defended China from external threats. I am not sure I this helps but, I hope it does.
2.The need for a two-chamber government
3.The idea that leaders would be accountable to the population
4.A stable form of government that would last to modern times
5.Electing a representative to make laws on citizens' behalf
I agree In 500 BC the Roman government began to institute the following changes, they started introducing the need for a two-chamber government - this came to be an important change together with the idea that leaders would be accountable to the population. Furthermore, they elected a representative to make laws on citizens' behalf. Correct answers: 2, 3, 5.
Answer:
North had a more widespread network of railroads available for delivering troops and supplies to the battlefield.
Explanation:
The United States Civil War happened when the South ceded from the Union after the election of Abraham Lincoln, because they believed that they were no longer represented in the Union because Lincoln was an anti-slavery President. The South formed the Confederacy states and had advantages such as outstanding military officers, strong motivation and knowledge of ground, but since the Northern states were more industrialized they were able to produce their own supplies for the war, and counted with a network of railroads that were able to deliver those war supplies to the battlefield.
Direct rule and indirect rule have their advantages and disadvantages. Indirect rule should give colonies a sense of independence while direct rule gives supervision on what they should do. Africans would have better opportunities under British rule because they educate people in their colonies. Still eventually people will want their freedom because they do want to be under someone else’s control.