Answer: The width of the field = 160 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that , A field is yards wide.
That means , The width of the field = yards
Since , the fraction is in mixed for , so first we convert this into improper fraction.
Therefore , the width of the field = yards
Since 1 yard = 3 feet.
⇒ the width of the field = feet
Therefore , the width of the field = 160 feet
Answer:
24
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:
6 ( 2 + 2 )
Step 2:
12 + 12
Answer:
24
Hope This Helps :)
Answer:
6(2+2)
first of all u add 2+2 =4 the 6 x 4 = 24
Step-by-step explanation:
what is your question please
Drag and drop the labels to the correct positions on the number line.
Answer:
You have to put A on -6 and b on 6.
Step-by-step explanation:
IN order to solve tis you just have to take one of the markers, lets say A and move it 6 units to the left all the way to -6, then you just have to move the B marker 6 units to the right from 0 all the way to the 6, that is how you get the two numbers that have a distanceof 6 units from 0 on the number line.
Answer:
See attached image.
Step-by-step explanation:
Start at 0 and count to the right. When you get to 6, place EITHER marker on the point. It doesn't look like it matters whether you use A or B.
Start at 0 and count to the left. When you get to 6, place the other marker on the point.
Answer:
a)
b) P-value = 0.2650
c) No, this programme will not be recommended as there is no real improvement over the national average.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 240
p = 66% = 0.66
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of students admitted to law school , x = 163
a) First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
b) Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.2650
c) Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is no real improvement over the national average.
No, this programme will not be recommended as there is no real improvement over the national average.
» Each y value is determined by
multiplying each x value by 3, so the
pattern is multiplicative
» Each y value is determined by adding
4 to each x value, so the pattern is
additive
» Each y-value is determined by adding
2 to each value, so the pattern is
additive
» Each y value is determined by
multiplying each value by 2, so the
pattern is multiplicative
Done
Answer:
Do you mind giving a picture of the table?
Answer:your answer is Each y-value is determined by adding 4 to each x-value by so the pattern is addictive
Step-by-step explanation: