General Grant believed that total war was a military strategy that aimed to completely destroy an enemy's ability to fight by targeting not only military resources but also civilian infrastructure and morale.
This strategy aimed to demoralize and disrupt the enemy's population and economy, making it impossible for them to continue the war effort.
While effective in achieving victory, total war can have devastating consequences for civilians and infrastructures, as seen in the American Civil War and World War II.
Targeting civilian populations and infrastructure can result in significant loss of life, destruction of homes, and lasting trauma for affected communities.
In my opinion, total war is not an appropriate war strategy in modern times. The principles of just war and international humanitarian law seek to protect civilians and limit the destruction of infrastructure.
Therefore, it is necessary to consider the human cost of any military action and seek to minimize harm to civilians and infrastructure. While war is sometimes necessary to protect against aggression, efforts must be made to protect innocent lives and minimize destruction.
Learn more about term total war here
#SPJ2
Answer:
it is that they were immigrants
Explanation:
i learned that in 5th grade
b. The President can be impeached by supreme court
c.The president cannot be removed until convicted in a court of law
d. The President can be impeached by the house and be removed by the senate
Answer:
The correct answer is choice D
Explanation:
This is the correct answer because the house of representatives are responsible for impeaching the president, but the president can only be removed by the senate, who acts like a court in the impeachment process...
(The first answer was correct, Credit to them:D)