The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Nixon that the president cannot excuse himself from offering testimony that would be valuable in a criminal trial.
This was the instance in which President Nixon was embroiled in the so-called "water gate controversy" in the United States.
This had occurred as a result of the President breaking into democratic party headquarters to obtain critical documents. The president cannot excuse himself from delivering the evidence that must be used in a criminal case process, the court had instructed him to do. The judge rejected his request to withhold the tape using his authority.
This had occurred as a result of the President breaking into democratic party headquarters to obtain critical documents. Therefore, we can draw the conclusion that Nixon's resignation was caused by the Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Nixon.
Thus, The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Nixon
For more information about Nixon V US, click here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
Bug
Explanation:
Static characters undergo little or no change at all during the course of a narrative.
If you take a non-restrictive clause out of a sentence, the basic meaning of the sentence stays the same.
A non-restrictive clause is an incidental description thrown into the sentence.
all of the above