The correct answer is
A)whole wheat bread, apple, low-fat milk, salad, and low-fat meat.
Trust me I got it right ✅
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
The purpose of writing fables is to convey a moral lesson and message.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Fire was first given to man by nature itself. When a forest is set on fire by cinders from a neighboring volcano, or when a tree is set ablaze by a thunderbolt, we may say that nature strikes a match. In the early history of the world, nature had to kindle all the fires, for man by his own effort was unable to produce a spark. The first method, then, of getting fire for use was to light sticks of wood at a flame kindled by nature—by a volcano, perhaps, or by a stroke of lightning. These firebrands were carried to the home and used in kindling the fires there. The fire secured in this way was carefully guarded and was kept burning as long as possible. But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished. A sudden gust of wind or a sudden shower would put it out. Then a new firebrand would have to be secured, and this often meant a long journey and a deal of trouble.
In 1827, John Walker, a druggist in a small English town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. The druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. It is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. Although Walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. It could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. In a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. The match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. It would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. This was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar.
What does the author mean by “we may say that nature strikes a match”?
Matches were created by nature.
Matches did not help people.
Matches required natural chemicals.
Nature provided fire for humans.
Author mean by “we may say that nature strikes a match” that Nature provided fire for humans. Option (D) is correct.
The outermost or topmost layer of a physical object or place is referred to as its surface in most contexts. It is the area or part of the thing that an observer can initially perceive using their senses of touch and sight, as well as the area where other materials first come into contact with the object.
The set of structural principles governing the English language are known as English grammar. This encompasses the organization of individual words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and texts as a whole.
This article presents a generalized, modern Standard English, a speech and writing style used in public discourse across a variety of registers, from official to informal, in fields like broadcasting, education, entertainment, government, and news. Some historical, social, cultural, and regional varieties of English deviate from the grammar discussed here, though they are often less significant than variations in vocabulary and pronunciation.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct. Nature provided fire for humans.
Learn more about Surface, here;
#SPJ3
B. a plot
C. a conflict
D. a description
Which sentence best describes Paine's claim in the excerpt?
God would not take sides between the British and the American colonists.
It was necessary to save Americans because God did not support military destruction.
It was necessary for America to fight the British to defend their religious values.
God would defend the American colonists' fight because their cause was upright.
It was necessary for Americans to save themselves and not wait for God to help them.
In this excerpt Thomas Paine says that “God Almighty will not give up a people to military destruction, or leave them unsupportedly to perish” and that “I cannot see on what grounds the king of Britain can look up to heaven for help against us” he is completely sure that God in his goodness would not choose a side between them, the answer is God would not take sides between the British and the American colonists.
The sentence that best describes Paine's claim in the excerpt is A. God would not take sides between the British and the American colonists.
This refers to the statement or assertion about something that may not be true but would need supporting details to validate it.
Hence, we can see that from the given text, there is the narration by Paine where he talks about the actions of the colonists and the intervention of God and how He would be impartial.
Read more about claims here:
#SPJ5