Answer:
express unpopular views in a peaceful way.
Explanation:
Answer: This is quite a complicated question and therefore requires quite a complicated and extensive answer. While it may seem like a minimum wage is good for the lowest-paid workers it isn't very good for an economy and workers as a whole. The reason for this being is that having a minimum wage and subsequently raising it (as is being done throughout the United States) boosts inflation meaning the price for products rises, (essentially negating all benefits that the workers received from a higher minimum wage.) Now while the lowest class workers don't really receive any benefit from this as their wage goes up but the products they produce also go up in price as well, but the average middle class consumer gets hit hard by this as their product prices raise but they still have the same wage. Another downside to having a minimum wage and having it consistently rising is that companies are forced to cut employees or not hire any more people all together. This is why jobless claims rise after wages rise. Companies cannot afford to pay workers a higher minimum wage and keep all their workers at the same time otherwise they would go in the red. This forces them to make cuts in staffing. Minimum wage would mandate that even if a potential worker and company agree on a price to pay for their work, the law would mandate that this would not be a possibility essentially making work harder to find. Minimum wage should not even really be needed as companies and workers should be able to find a good and fair price for work on their own without the governments help. If a worker doesn't like the wage they are receiving then they can quite and find a better paying job. This also boosts competition among businesses as they are all fighting for workers to fill their jobs and would also raise the wage, but in a natural process without all the detriments that artificially raising the minimum wage brings. Companies should be allowed to hire workers at whatever pay per hour they so what as long as it is agreed to as well by the worker. This means that more jobs are open to a more wide variety of people and that also means that if people want to work for less they can still be open to that opportunity as well.
Answer: A successful Dutch settlement in the colony grew up on the southern tip of Manhattan Island and was christened New Amsterdam. However, as they were ignorant of European customs of property and contracts, it was not long before the Manhattans came into armed conflict with the expanding Dutch settlement at New Amsterdam.
Explanation:
New Amsterdam, now New York, differed from surrounding colonies due to its diverse culture from European immigrants and enslaved Africans, its focus on trade rather than agriculture, and its religious tolerance. Its development was hindered by the arbitrary governance of the Dutch West India Company and the change of power in 1664 when the English took over.
Life in New Amsterdam in the 17th century differed from surrounding colonies due to its unique cultural diversity, economic structure, and political practices. New Amsterdam was a Dutch settlement primarily known for its fur trade and served as a major seaport. Moreover, it was characterized by religious tolerance and cultural diversity due to the influx of immigrants from various parts of Europe including Belgium, France, Germany and Scandinavia, in addition to the enslaved Africans. Unlike many other colonies at the time, New Amsterdam was not primarily agricultural, but its economy was largely shaped by trade and business.
Street names such as Wall Street still remind us today of the economic focus of this colony. To fortify the colony against Native American uprisings, enslaved Africans were forced to build fortifications, which is a less known fact about the origins of the city. The diversity of the colony is supposed by reports of up to 18 different languages being spoken on the streets of New Amsterdam. However, despite the economic opportunities and religious toleration, the colony grew slowly mainly due to arbitrary government set up by the Dutch West India Company. Religious dissenters who did not belong to the Dutch Reformed Church were persecuted which caused dissatisfaction among the settlers. Termination of Dutch rule in 1664 by the English further caused changes in the colony's governance and development.
#SPJ2
this widespread peace?
a. Egypt created a form of communication based on pictures and symbols.
b. The Nile was wide and plentiful.
c. Egypt was surrounded by three deserts.
d. Pharaohs maintained complete control over the people.
The reason that was NOT listed for the widespread peace during Menes' reign as the first pharaoh of Egypt and the Egyptian Society was that pharaohs maintained complete control over the people.
The subject of this question is History.
The reason that was NOT listed for the widespread peace during Menes' reign as the first pharaoh of Egypt and the Egyptian Society was option d. Pharaohs maintaining complete control over the people.
The other options, a. Egypt creating a form of communication based on pictures and symbols, b. The Nile being wide and plentiful, and c. Egypt being surrounded by three deserts, were all listed as reasons for the peace, stability, and prosperity experienced during this period.
Answer:
As the first written constitution in the New World, the Mayflower Compact laid the foundations for two other revolutionary documents: the Declaration of Independence, which stated that governments derive their powers “from the consent of the governed,” and the Constitution.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Mayflower Compact continued the idea of law made by the people. This idea lies at the heart of democracy. From its crude beginning in Plymouth, self-government evolved into the town meetings of New England and larger local governments in colonial America.