Noma plans to save $3,400 per year for the next 35 years. If she can earn an annual interest rate of 9.2 percent, how much will she have in 35 years? a) $716,300.24 b) $119,000.00c) $767,464.54 d) $83807128 e) $734,09652

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

c) $767,464.54

Explanation:

The computation of the future value of an annuity is shown below:

As we know that

Future value of annuity F =  Payment made × ((1 + rate of interest)^t - 1) ÷ rate of interest

= $3,400 × (1.092^35 - 1) ÷ 0.092

= $3,400 × 225.7249

= $767,464.54

Hence, the future value of an annuity is $767,464.54

Therefore the correct option is c.

Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Noma will have $767,464.54 in 35 years.

Explanation:

To calculate the future value of Noma's savings, we can use the formula for compound interest: FV = P(1 + r)^t, where FV is the future value, P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate, and t is the number of years. In this case, Noma plans to save $3,400 per year for 35 years with an annual interest rate of 9.2 percent. Plugging these values into the formula:

FV = 3400 * (1 + 0.092)^35

Calculating this expression, Noma will have a future value of $767,464.54 in 35 years.

Learn more about Compound interest here:

brainly.com/question/34614903

#SPJ3


Related Questions

Unland Company uses a periodic inventory system. Details for the inventory account for the month of January 2017 are as follows: Units Per unit price Total Balance, 1/1/2017 290 $5.00 $1450 Purchase, 1/15/2017 140 ..5.10 714 Purchase, 1/28/2017 140 ..5.30 742 An end of the month (1/31/2017) inventory showed that 230 units were on hand. If the company uses LIFO, what is the value of the ending inventory?
Holmes Company produces a product that can be either sold as is or processed further. Holmes has already spent $96,000 to produce 1,375 units that can be sold now for $89,500 to another manufacturer. Alternatively, Holmes can process the units further at an incremental cost of $290 per unit. If Holmes processes further, the units can be sold for $440 each. Should Holmes sell the product now or process it further
In our newly networked world, reading is:A. the taking in of words.B. a commentc. a conversation,D. only about producing words.
What is the payback period for the following set of cash flows? (Round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) Year Cash Flow 0 –$ 5,500 1 1,525 2 1,725 3 2,125 4 1,625
when a perpetual system is in used and transportation cot is incurred to obtain inventory, the transportation cost is:

3. Explain why price is equal to marginal revenue in pure competition but not in a monopoly. Include in your explanation why the marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve for a single price monopolist?

Answers

In a perfect competition market, the Marginal Revenue is equal to the price (MR = P), and for monopolist, the marginal revenue is not equal to the price, because changes in quantity of output affects the price.

Why is price equal to Marginal revenue in pure competition?

Marginal revenue (MR) is an increase in the total revenue resulting from an increase in one unit of product. As the price always remains constant in perfect competition, increasing the total revenue from the production of 1 additional unit will be equal to the price.

Therefore, Price = Marginal Revenue (P = MR) in perfect competition.

In a monopoly the demand curve is the same as the firm's demand curve, in that the industry demand curve drops downwards. One owner can set the price or quantity and not both.

If one is determined the price of the other will be determined by the demand function. Increasing the monopolist's profit also requires that the marginal cost should be equal to the marginal revenue as if it were in perfect competition.

The Marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve because a straight line is market demand. The firm will have to lower the Product Price if it wants to sell more of its product a unit of sale sold average revenue equal to the Price.

So the AR curve of AR monopolist and perfect competition MR and AR are both same.

Thus, this is the reason why the marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve in the case of a monopolist.

To learn more about Marginal revenue, refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/10822075

Answer:

The answer is in a perfect competition profit is maximized when marginal cost equal marginal revenue and price is equal to average revenue and marginal revenue, while in monopolist profit is maximized when marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue.

Explanation:

The firm in a perfectly competitive market is a price taker,the price in the market is determined by the market forces of demand and supply. The firm has to sell their product at the ruling market price.The demand curve facing the firm in perfectly competitive market is horizontal or perfectly elastic, profit is therefore maximized when the marginal cost is equal to average revenue and marginal revenue. The firm in the market operate at the output level in which the price and marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost. Whatever prices that change the market demand or supply will change the demand curve faced by the firm.The firm cannot do anything to this than to accept the market price and the demand curve.

In a monopoly the demand curve is identical to the demand curve of the firm, because industry demand curve is downward sloping.The monopolist can either set the price or quantity not the two.when one is determined the value of the other will be determined by the demand function. The profit maximization of the monopolist also requires that marginal cost must be equal to marginal revenue just like in the case of perfect completion.when the monopolist equates MR and MC the monopolist determines its output and the market price for the product. The revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve,because the straight line is the market demand. The firm will have to reduce The price of the product if they want to sell more of their product the unit of the product sold is the AR which is equal to the price.Therefore the AR curve of the monopolist and the perfect competition MR and AR are both identical that informed the reason why the marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve for a single price monopolist.

On January 1, 2021 M.T. Glass purchased the following investments: 1. 7,500 shares (representing 15%) of ZZ Company stock for $98,000 2. 25,000 shares (representing 40%) of AA Company stock for $440,000 M.T. Glass recorded the sale of some of its investments in 2022 as follows: 1. September 1 sold 5,000 shares of the ZZ Company stock for $76,000 2. December 31 sold 4,000 shares of the AA Company stock for $120,000 AA Company and ZZ Company reported the following information for the years 2021 and 2022: AA Company ZZ Company Net income in 2021 $260,000 $200,000 Dividends paid to M.T. Glass in 2021 $24,000 $15,000 Market value at Dec 31, 2021 $27 per share $22 per share Net income in 2022 $160,000 $225,000 Dividends paid to M.T. Glass in 2022 $41,000 $5,000 Market value at Dec 31, 2022 $24 per share $28 per share Calculate the amount of the realized gain reported in M.T. Glass' 2022 income statement resulting from the sale of the AA Company stock.

Answers

Answer:

$15000

Explanation:

If the investor the outstanding shares of the other company which is less than 20% then we can report the unrealized gains or losses in the income statement. The unrealized gain can be calculated as follows:

check the attachment below

Hill Company uses job-order costing. At the end of the month, the following data was gathered:Job #Total CostComplete?Sold?803$611yesyes804$423yesno805$805nono806$682yesyes807$525yesno808$250nono809$440yesyes810$773yesno811$267nono812$341nonoHill's selling price is cost plus 50% for each of its products. What is the selling price of Job 806

Answers

Answer:

$1,023

Explanation:

As for the provided information, we have:

Total cost associated with JOB 806 = $682

Is it completed = Yes

Are the product sold = Yes

Now, it is provided that the selling price of products = Cost + 50% of cost

Or simply Cost * 150% = Selling Price of goods

Therefore, selling price of this job = $682 * 150% = $1,023

Sitwell Corporation manufactures titanium and aluminum tennis racquets. Sitwell’s total overhead costs consist of assembly costs and inspection costs. The following information is available: Cost Titanium Aluminum Total Cost Assembly 500 mach. hours 500 mach. hours $45,000 Inspections 350 150 $75,000 2,100 labor hours 1,900 labor hours Sitwell is considering switching from one overhead rate based on labor hours to activity-based costing. Using activity-based costing, how much "assembly cost is assigned to titanium racquets"?

Answers

Answer:

$22,500

Explanation:

Activity based costing (ABC) is a method of cast allocation where the overheads and other indirect costs are  allocated to products and services based on the volume of different activities consumed by each product.

The total cost pool is divided by the defined cost drivers to determine the cost driver rate.

                       Titanium Hours    Aluminium hours                  Cost

Assembly                   500                      500         1000           45000

Inspection                   350                      150           500            75000

Labor hours               2100                      1900        4000          120000

Cost per labor hour   = 120000/4000= 30

Using activity based costing , portion of the assembly cost assigned to titanium Racquets =   Titanium assembly hours / total assembly hours * total assembly cost

500/1000*45000

=22,500

Boise, a division of Price Enterprises, currently performs computer services for various departments of the firm. One of the services has created a number of operating problems, and management is exploring whether to outsource the service to a consultant. Traceable variable and fixed operating costs total $80,000 and $25,000, respectively, in addition to $18,000 of corporate administrative overhead allocated from Price. If Boise were to use the outside consultant, fixed operating costs would be reduced by 70%. The irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing decision total:

Answers

Answer:

irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing = $25500

Explanation:

given data

variable costs = $80,000

fixed operating costs = $25,000

administrative overhead = $18,000

fixed operating costs reduced = 70%

to find out

The irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing decision total

solution

we get here first reduction in traceable cost that is

reduction = 30% of $25,000

reduction = $7500

so irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing will be

irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing = administrative overhead + reduction cost

irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing = $18000 + $7500

irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing = $25500

Wolverine Company financial statements included the effects of these errors: Reported Net Income for Year 1 was $20,000. Reported Net Income for Year 2 was $18,000. Indicate the error in 12/31/2 Retained Earnings:

Answers

Answer:

Net income year 2 = $21,300

Explanation:

I looked for the missing information and found this:

Year            Depreciation overstated         Prepaid expense omitted

1                              $2,500                                $2,000

2                             $4,000                                $2,700

If your question doesn't include the same values, just adjust the answer.

Year 2's net income = net income (year 2) + overstated depreciation (year 2) + omitted prepaid expenses (year 1) - omitted prepaid expenses (year 2) = $18,000 + $4,000 + $2,000 - $2,700 = $21,300

Other Questions