Answer:
c) $767,464.54
Explanation:
The computation of the future value of an annuity is shown below:
As we know that
Future value of annuity F = Payment made × ((1 + rate of interest)^t - 1) ÷ rate of interest
= $3,400 × (1.092^35 - 1) ÷ 0.092
= $3,400 × 225.7249
= $767,464.54
Hence, the future value of an annuity is $767,464.54
Therefore the correct option is c.
Noma will have $767,464.54 in 35 years.
To calculate the future value of Noma's savings, we can use the formula for compound interest: FV = P(1 + r)^t, where FV is the future value, P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate, and t is the number of years. In this case, Noma plans to save $3,400 per year for 35 years with an annual interest rate of 9.2 percent. Plugging these values into the formula:
FV = 3400 * (1 + 0.092)^35
Calculating this expression, Noma will have a future value of $767,464.54 in 35 years.
#SPJ3
In a perfect competition market, the Marginal Revenue is equal to the price (MR = P), and for monopolist, the marginal revenue is not equal to the price, because changes in quantity of output affects the price.
Marginal revenue (MR) is an increase in the total revenue resulting from an increase in one unit of product. As the price always remains constant in perfect competition, increasing the total revenue from the production of 1 additional unit will be equal to the price.
Therefore, Price = Marginal Revenue (P = MR) in perfect competition.
In a monopoly the demand curve is the same as the firm's demand curve, in that the industry demand curve drops downwards. One owner can set the price or quantity and not both.
If one is determined the price of the other will be determined by the demand function. Increasing the monopolist's profit also requires that the marginal cost should be equal to the marginal revenue as if it were in perfect competition.
The Marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve because a straight line is market demand. The firm will have to lower the Product Price if it wants to sell more of its product a unit of sale sold average revenue equal to the Price.
So the AR curve of AR monopolist and perfect competition MR and AR are both same.
Thus, this is the reason why the marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve in the case of a monopolist.
To learn more about Marginal revenue, refer to the link:
Answer:
The answer is in a perfect competition profit is maximized when marginal cost equal marginal revenue and price is equal to average revenue and marginal revenue, while in monopolist profit is maximized when marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue.
Explanation:
The firm in a perfectly competitive market is a price taker,the price in the market is determined by the market forces of demand and supply. The firm has to sell their product at the ruling market price.The demand curve facing the firm in perfectly competitive market is horizontal or perfectly elastic, profit is therefore maximized when the marginal cost is equal to average revenue and marginal revenue. The firm in the market operate at the output level in which the price and marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost. Whatever prices that change the market demand or supply will change the demand curve faced by the firm.The firm cannot do anything to this than to accept the market price and the demand curve.
In a monopoly the demand curve is identical to the demand curve of the firm, because industry demand curve is downward sloping.The monopolist can either set the price or quantity not the two.when one is determined the value of the other will be determined by the demand function. The profit maximization of the monopolist also requires that marginal cost must be equal to marginal revenue just like in the case of perfect completion.when the monopolist equates MR and MC the monopolist determines its output and the market price for the product. The revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve,because the straight line is the market demand. The firm will have to reduce The price of the product if they want to sell more of their product the unit of the product sold is the AR which is equal to the price.Therefore the AR curve of the monopolist and the perfect competition MR and AR are both identical that informed the reason why the marginal revenue curve is steeper than the demand curve for a single price monopolist.
Answer:
$15000
Explanation:
If the investor the outstanding shares of the other company which is less than 20% then we can report the unrealized gains or losses in the income statement. The unrealized gain can be calculated as follows:
check the attachment below
Answer:
$1,023
Explanation:
As for the provided information, we have:
Total cost associated with JOB 806 = $682
Is it completed = Yes
Are the product sold = Yes
Now, it is provided that the selling price of products = Cost + 50% of cost
Or simply Cost 150% = Selling Price of goods
Therefore, selling price of this job = $682 150% = $1,023
Answer:
$22,500
Explanation:
Activity based costing (ABC) is a method of cast allocation where the overheads and other indirect costs are allocated to products and services based on the volume of different activities consumed by each product.
The total cost pool is divided by the defined cost drivers to determine the cost driver rate.
Titanium Hours Aluminium hours Cost
Assembly 500 500 1000 45000
Inspection 350 150 500 75000
Labor hours 2100 1900 4000 120000
Cost per labor hour = 120000/4000= 30
Using activity based costing , portion of the assembly cost assigned to titanium Racquets = Titanium assembly hours / total assembly hours * total assembly cost
500/1000*45000
=22,500
Answer:
irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing = $25500
Explanation:
given data
variable costs = $80,000
fixed operating costs = $25,000
administrative overhead = $18,000
fixed operating costs reduced = 70%
to find out
The irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing decision total
solution
we get here first reduction in traceable cost that is
reduction = 30% of $25,000
reduction = $7500
so irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing will be
irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing = administrative overhead + reduction cost
irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing = $18000 + $7500
irrelevant costs in Boise’s outsourcing = $25500
Answer:
Net income year 2 = $21,300
Explanation:
I looked for the missing information and found this:
Year Depreciation overstated Prepaid expense omitted
1 $2,500 $2,000
2 $4,000 $2,700
If your question doesn't include the same values, just adjust the answer.
Year 2's net income = net income (year 2) + overstated depreciation (year 2) + omitted prepaid expenses (year 1) - omitted prepaid expenses (year 2) = $18,000 + $4,000 + $2,000 - $2,700 = $21,300