Answer:
the answer is -30 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
that is the answer because -42 is -12 feet lower than -30 feet. plsss give me brainliest plsss
FIFO Method, Valuation of Goods Transferred Out and Ending Work in Process
K-Briggs Company uses the FIFO method to account for the costs of production. For Crushing, the first processing department, the following equivalent units schedule has been prepared:
Direct Materials Conversion Costs
Units started and completed 28,000 28,000
Units, beginning work in process:
10,000 × 0% — —
10,000 × 40% — 4,000
Units, ending work in process:
6,000 × 100% 6,000 —
6,000 × 75% — 4,500
Equivalent units of output 34,000 36,500
The cost per equivalent unit for the period was as follows:
Direct materials $2.00
Conversion costs 6.00
Total $8.00
The cost of beginning work in process was direct materials, $40,000; conversion costs, $30,000.
Therefore , the solution of the given problem of unitary comes out to be price of terminating the work-in-progress inventory is $12,000 + $27,000 = $39,000.
Applying what was learned, using this variable approach, and combining all relevant data from two individuals who used a particular tactic will enable completion of the task. The entity indicated in the formula will either also be recognized, or both crucial processes integers will honestly disregard the colour, if the preferred assertion outcome materialises. A refundable fee of Rupees ($1.21) may be necessary for fifty pencils.
Here,
The cost of goods transferred out of Crushing would be determined using the FIFO method in the manner shown below:
Units started and completed plus equivalent units in the ending work-in-process inventory equal equivalent units of output completed.
=> Completed equivalent units = 28,000 + 6,000 100%
34,000 completed units of output are equivalent.
Cost of goods shipped out equals Cost per equivalent unit minus the number of completed equivalent units of output.
=> ($2.00 + $6.00) * 34,000 equals the cost of the goods transferred out.
Transfer of Goods Cost:
=> $8.00 x 34,000
$272,000 is the cost of transferring the products.
We must multiply the equivalent units in the ending work in process inventory by the cost per equivalent unit in order to determine
the expense of ending work in process inventory:
=>Direct materials: 6,000 units x 100% of 6,000
Direct material costs for ending work-in-progress inventory are $2.00 multiplied by 6,000 to equal $12,000
=> Costs of conversion: 6,000 x 75% = 4,500 units.
Cost of conversion costs in ending work in progress inventory = $6.00 divided by 4,500 equals $27,000.
The price of terminating the work-in-progress inventory is therefore $12,000 + $27,000 = $39,000.
To know more about unitary method visit:
#SPJ1
Answer:
In Geometry, we have several undefined terms: point, line and plane. From these three undefined terms, all other terms in Geometry can be defined. In Geometry, we define a point as a location and no size. ... And the third undefined term is the line.
Step-by-step explanation:
The fraction is closer to 1/2 than to 0 or 1 is 8/12.
The fractional bar is a horizontal bar that divides the numerator and denominator of every fraction into these two halves.
Given:
First Fraction
2/12 = 1/6 = 0.1667
Second Fraction
3/12
= 0.25
Third Fraction
8/12
= 0.6667
Fourth Fraction
10/12
= 0.83333
So, Fraction closer to 1/2 or 0.5 is 8/12.
Learn more about fraction here:
#SPJ2
In this situation I would convert the 1/2 into a fraction that has a common denominator. 1/2 will now be 6/12.
I think the best answer here is 8/12 because 6/12 is only two lines away from 8/12 where as everything else is either closer to 1 or 0.
I hope this helps. Good luck.
6 4 6 8 7 7 6 3 3 8 10 4 8
7 8 7 5 9 5 8 4 3 8 5 5 4
4 4 8 4 5 6 2 5 9 9 8 4 8
9 9 5 9 7 8 3 10 8 9 6
Develop a 95% confidence interval estimate of the population mean rating for Miami. If required, round your answers to two decimal places. Do not round intermediate calculations.
Answer:
The 95% confidence interval estimate of the population mean rating for Miami is (5.7, 7.0).
Step-by-step explanation:
The (1 - α)% confidence interval for the population mean, when the population standard deviation is not provided is:
The sample selected is of size, n = 50.
The critical value of t for 95% confidence level and (n - 1) = 49 degrees of freedom is:
*Use a t-table.
Compute the sample mean and sample standard deviation as follows:
Compute the 95% confidence interval estimate of the population mean rating for Miami as follows:
Thus, the 95% confidence interval estimate of the population mean rating for Miami is (5.7, 7.0).
Answer:
g(x) = -x² - 4
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case, we are only changing a (reflection and vertical shrink/stretch) and k (vertical movement)
k = -4 because we are moving 4 units down
a = -1 because we are just reflecting over the x-axis
Answer:
C(60) = 2.7*10⁻⁴
t = 1870.72 s
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x(t) be the amount of chlorine in the pool at time t. Then the concentration of chlorine is
C(t) = 3*10⁻⁴*x(t).
The input rate is 6*(0.001/100) = 6*10⁻⁵.
The output rate is 6*C(t) = 6*(3*10⁻⁴*x(t)) = 18*10⁻⁴*x(t)
The initial condition is x(0) = C(0)*10⁴/3 = (0.03/100)*10⁴/3 = 1.
The problem is to find C(60) in percents and to find t such that 3*10⁻⁴*x(t) = 0.002/100.
Remember, 1 h = 60 minutes. The initial value problem is
dx/dt= 6*10⁻⁵ - 18*10⁻⁴x = - 6* 10⁻⁴*(3x - 10⁻¹) x(0) = 1.
The equation is separable. It can be rewritten as dx/(3x - 10⁻¹) = -6*10⁻⁴dt.
The integration of both sides gives us
Ln |3x - 0.1| / 3 = -6*10⁻⁴*t + C or |3x - 0.1| = e∧(3C)*e∧(-18*10⁻⁴t).
Therefore, 3x - 0.1 = C₁*e∧(-18*10⁻⁴t).
Plug in the initial condition t = 0, x = 1 to obtain C₁ = 2.9.
Thus the solution to the IVP is
x(t) = (1/3)(2.9*e∧(-18*10⁻⁴t)+0.1)
then
C(t) = 3*10⁻⁴*(1/3)(2.9*e∧(-18*10⁻⁴t)+0.1) = 10⁻⁴*(2.9*e∧(-18*10⁻⁴t)+0.1)
If t = 60
We have
C(60) = 10⁻⁴*(2.9*e∧(-18*10⁻⁴*60)+0.1) = 2.7*10⁻⁴
Now, we obtain t such that 3*10⁻⁴*x(t) = 2*10⁻⁵
3*10⁻⁴*(1/3)(2.9*e∧(-18*10⁻⁴t)+0.1) = 2*10⁻⁵
t = 1870.72 s