Please help ACTUALLY ANSWER i dont understand CER writing?this is an example:

Claim: cookies are good because they are good
evidence : ¨cookies have 1 billion protien¨- the new york times
reasoning: (what would i put here???)
PLEASE HELP AND ACTUALLUY ANSWER

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: Well cer does stand for claim, evidence and reasoning and for reasoning I usually put bs there so, for example

Claim: Cookies are good because they have a lot of protein

Evidence: “Cookies have 1 billion protein.” - New York Times

Reasoning: I chose this because it specifically backs up my claim. Not only do cookies have 1 billion grams of protein they also are very delicious to eat.

Related Questions

9. Which of the following is true regarding current in an external circuit? A. A direct current constantly switches direction of flow to match the change of charge at each terminal. B. Direct current always moves from the positively charged terminal to the negatively charged terminal. C. Alternating current always moves from the positively charged terminal to the negatively charged terminal. D. The flow of an alternating current switches direction when a generator's terminals change its charge.
Which statement describes an atomic nucleus? An atomic nucleus is negatively charged. An atomic nucleus has no electrical charge. An atomic nucleus consists of mostly empty space. An atomic nucleus contains most of the atom’s mass.
Find the percentage of the total work lost to friction if 28.7 J of work is put into pushing a block up a ramp resulting in 14.2 J of stored potential energy at the top.
Choose "extinct" if the species is extinct and "endangered" if the species is endangered. Sixty years ago, as few as 20 whooping cranes were left on earth. Now, thanks to conservation efforts, there are more than 300 whooping cranes in the wild.A.extinctB.endangered
A racecar is traveling in uniform circular motion around a racetrack. What happens to the centripetal acceleration of the car if the speed is doubled and the radius of the circle remains constant?

The earth exerts a force of 500 newtons on an object what is the mass of the object in kg

Answers

Weight (that's what the 500 N is) = (mass) x (gravity) .

On Earth, gravity = about 9.8 m/s² , so

   500 N = (mass) x (9.8 m/s²) .

Divide each side by 9.8 m/s²:

   Mass = (500 N) / (9.8 m/s²)

=    51 kg (rounded) .

A car drives west with a speed of 65 km/h. What is the car's speed? What is the car'svelocity?!

Answers

Speed = 65 km/h
Velocity = 65 Km/h due west

What instrument would scientist use to take measurements in the upper troposphere A. x-ray monitor

B. ice core bore

C. weather balloon

D. underwater sonar

Answers

Scientists use the instrument weather balloon to take measurements in the upper troposphere. Answer: C.
The weather balloon uses small device called radiosonde and measures weather parameters like atmospheric pressure, temperature, humidity and wind speed.
These instruments operate in the troposphere.

Scientist use a weather balloon to measurements in the upper troposphere.

A golf ball is dropped from rest from a height of 9.5m. It hits the pavement then bounces back up rising just 5.7 m before falling back down again. A boy then catches the ball on the way down when it is 1.20 m above the pavement. Ignoring air resistance, calculate the total amount of time the ball is in the air, from drop to catch.

Answers

Answer: 3.4s

Explanation:

There are three stages in the motion of the ball, so you have to calculate the times for every stage.

1) Ball dropping from 9.5m: free fall

d = Vo + gt² / 2

Vo = 0 ⇒ d = gt² / 2 ⇒ t² = 2d / g = 2 × 9.5 m / 9.81 m/s² = 1.94 s²

⇒ t = √ (1.94 s²) = 1.39s

2) Ball rising 5.7m (vertical rise)

i) Determine the initial speed:

Vf² = Vo² - 2gd

Vf² = 0 ⇒ Vo² = 2gd = 2 × 9.81 m/s² × 5.7m = 111.8 m²/s²

⇒ Vo = 10.6 m/s

ii) time rising

Vf = Vo - gt

Vf = 0 ⇒ Vo = gt ⇒

t = Vo / g = 10.6 m/s / 9.81 m/s² = 1.08 s

3) Ball dropping from 5.7 m to 1.20m above the pavement (free fall)

i) d = 5.7m - 1.20m = 4.5m

ii) d = gt² / 2 ⇒ t² = 2d / g = 2 × 4.5 m / 9.81 m/s² = 0.92 s²

⇒ t = √ (0.92 s²) = 0.96s

4) Total time

t = 1.39s + 1.08s + 0.96s = 3.43s ≈ 3.4s

The time the ball takes to fall 9.5 meters is the square root of (19/g), where g is gravitational acceleration.
The time it takes to rise to 5.7 meters is the square root of (11.4/g), for the same value of g.
The time it takes to fall from 5.7 meters to 1.2 is the square root of (9/g).
So the answer is [sqrt(19)+sqrt(11.4)+sqrt(9)]/sqrt(g). If g=10, the answer is 3.39 seconds; if g=9.8, the answer is 3.43 seconds.

All atoms of the same element must have the same number of

Answers

Explanation:

Atomic number is defined as the total number of protons present in an element.

Each element of the periodic table has different atomic number because each of them have different number of protons.

For example, atomic number of Na is 11, and atomic number of Ca is 20.

On the other hand, atomic mass is the sum of total number of protons and neutrons present in an atom.

For example, atomic mass of nitrogen is 14 that is, it contains 7 protons and 7 neutrons.

Thus, we can conclude that all atoms of the same element must have the same number of protons.

Answer: Protons

Explanation: The number of protons corresponds to the atomic number.

Michelle melted a compound in the lab and performed the same procedure five times. The chart below shows the time it took for the compound to melt during the five trials.Trial Time (min:sec)
1 3:14
2 3:10
3 4:05
4 3:12
5 3:09

After reviewing her data, she realized that trial 3 was vastly different from the other four trial times. Which of the following reasons could explain the radical difference in melting time for trial 3?

A larger quantity of compound was used in trial 3.
The compound started at a lower temperature in trial 3.
The burner was not directly under the compound during trial 3.
all of these

Answers

Answer:

It is actually all of these

Explanation:

Final answer:

Several factors could account for the variance seen in the third trial's melting time. This could be due to using a larger quantity of compound, starting at a lower temperature, or the burner not being directly under the compound.

Explanation:

The radical difference in melting time for trial 3 in Michelle's experiment could be explained by several variables. Given the information present, Michelle could have used a larger quantity of compound in trial 3, thus taking longer to melt. Secondly, the compound may have started at a lower temperature, requiring additional time to reach its melting point. Finally, if the burner was not directly under the compound, this could also explain the longer time as the heat wouldn't be as concentrated on the compound. In other words, the answer could be 'all of these' as they are all potential reasons as to why the third trial had a heavier melting time.