Answer:
fair trial
Explanation:
because just cuz something is suspected does not mean it is true.
plz mark brainlest
13. To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no more than two unexplained or undocumented openings to the evidence package.
14. Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable, inaccurate, and estimated.
15. Before the evidence is even opened, the analyst must make sure there are witnesses.
12. The least common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.
The most common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.
13. To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no more than two unexplained or undocumented openings to the evidence package.
To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no unexplained or undocumented openings in the evidence package.
14. Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable, inaccurate, and estimated.
Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable and accurate.
15. Before the evidence is even opened, the analyst must make sure there are witnesses.
When evidence is opened, there must be proper documentation to prove it.
Answer:
idk
Explanation:idk
Answer:
ummmmmmmmmmmmm i need the same answer
Explanation:
SoRrY :O
Answer:
possibly
Explanation:
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.
Escola might be able to recover damages under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. This legal principle implies negligence if an event happens that wouldn't normally happen without negligence. However, the court's interpretation, local laws, and other factors would play roles in the final decision.
The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is a legal principle that allows negligence to be presumed if an event occurs that would not ordinarily happen unless someone was negligent. Escola, the waitress who was injured by the exploding bottle of soda, may be able to use this doctrine to pursue a claim against the bottling company, in spite of not being able to prove specific acts of negligence.
The principle rests on the premise that certain accidents are so obviously a result of negligence that direct proof is unnecessary. It typically applies where the defendant had exclusive control of the thing that caused the injury, and the accident is such that it ordinarily would not occur in the absence of negligence. Based on the provided details, the injury caused to Escola by the exploding bottle that had gone through standard industry testing and had remained undisturbed for 36 hours, can indeed be construed as an event that ordinarily does not happen unless there was negligence involved.
However, the final decision would depend on courts' interpretations, the specifics of the jurisdiction's laws, and other circumstances of the case.
#SPJ12
Answer:
Denying campaign reelection funds to legislators who oppose the President's policy stand
Explanation:
The framers of the constitution of the United States of America, positioned the president in article 2, section 3 of the constitution to be the chief legislator, granting him the power to alter policy and make remarkable influence on which bills the house can pass at any time.
Whether the president is popular or not, he or she can use the media to draw attention to the program of the legislature. Above all the possible means to influence the congress, the president is expected to refrain from denying legislative members who oppose his policies their respective campaign re-election funds.
A president attempting to influence congress to pass a legislative program would not typically employ the strategy of ignoring Congress.
In order to influence Congress to pass a legislative program, a president can employ various strategies. However, one strategy that a president would not typically use is ignoring Congress. Ignoring Congress would not be an effective way to promote policy proposals and secure legislative achievements. Instead, presidents often employ strategies such as negotiation, persuasion, compromise, media attention, and leveraging their popularity to influence members of Congress.
#SPJ12
Answer:
no its says to stand up for those who cant stand up but ethier way if u wanna stand up for that then do it you dont have to follow it we sin but be you
Explanation: Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.”