Answer:
the stock price is $45.44
Explanation:
The computation of the stock price is shown below:
Sales per share is
= Total sales ÷ stock outstanding shares
= $3,010,000 ÷ 106,000 shares
= $28.40
Now
Benchmark PS = Stock price ÷ Sales per share
Stock price = $28.40 × 1.6
= $45.44
hence, the stock price is $45.44
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
A call bond option is termed as the option that implies the bondholder the right to purchase the bonds at the prevailing price in the market. A buyer of a bond call option in the secondary market forecasts a drop in investment substantial rise in bond prices.
The correct option is a. I, II, and III only
Option a. I, II, and III only is correct because The contract value will decline as it reaches maturation because it will become less unpredictable.
The goal of purchasing a call option is to benefit if the price of the underlying stock rises. The attractiveness of the callable bond falls as the price of bitcoin declines, and the worth of the call option reduces as well.
The exercise price is the price where the individual who acquires a call option will be able to acquire the underlying shares. If this price is too high, the benefit from buying the stock at maturity will be too little, diminishing the value of the specified call option.
To know more about the listed call option, refer to the link below:
Answer: a. I, II, and III only
Explanation:
The exercise price refers to the amount that the person who buys the call option will get to buy the underlying stock at. If this price is high, the profit from buying the stock at maturity will be less so the value of the listed call option reduces.
As the contract approaches maturity, the value will decrease because it will be less volatile as it approaches maturity.
The purpose of buying a call option is so that a profit can be made if the underlying stock increases in value. If the stock decreases in value, the allure of the call option decreases so therefore will the value.
b. What is the safety stock they need to provide a 95% service level?
c. What is the order point the company should use?
Answer:
a) Average demand during the lead time = Sum of all the historical demand during lead time / Number of periods
= (55+75+75+70+80+60+50+70+60+85) / 10
= 680 / 10
= 68 gallons
b) Standard deviation of demand during lead time(\sigmadL) = 8.5 gallons
At 95% service level,value of Z = 1.65
Safety stock = Z(\sigmadL) = 1.65(8.5) = 14.03 gallons
c) Reorder point = Average demand during the lead time + Safety stock
= 68 + 14.03
= 82.03 gallons
Answer:
The answer is "".
Explanation:
You are equivalent investors in 16 percent of a portfolio and 4 percent of a risk-free asset. A weighted mean of these two will become the predicted return.
Operating assets $164,101 $153,211
Operating liabilities 120,785 114,836
Net cash flow from operations 46,709 39,540
Net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) 33,371 31,742
Discount factor 6.0% 6.0%
What are the company's free cash flows to the firm (FCFF) for 2017?
A. $28,430
B. $24,638
C. $28,907
D. $25,797
E. None of the above
Answer:
Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Net Operating assets in 2017:
= Operating assets - Operating liabilities
= $164,101 - $120,785
= $43,316
Net Operating assets in 2016:
= Operating assets - Operating liabilities
= $153,211 - $114,836
= $38,375
Increase in net operating assets:
= $43,316 - $38,375
= $4,941
Company's free cash flows to the firm (FCFF) for 2017:
= Net operating profit after tax 2017 - Increase in net operating assets
= $33,371 - $4,941
= $28,430
Answer:
1. In a Year 20,367 20,017
2. In a Year 21,333 21,917
3. In the case of NPW analysis Selected Target is best option because it is the better and cheaper investment while EUAM analysis states Walmart kit is better option,
4.Target is the best option because the cost difference is only around $600 which will last for 6 Years while in walmart case we will need to replace all the furniture in 3 Years .
Explanation:
1. Using NPW Analysis
Walmart Kit Target
Intial Cost 40000 65000
AMC 10000 12000
Salvage Value 12000 25000
Life Years 3 6
Total Cost
Intial Cost 40000 65000
Less Salvage 12000 25000
Balance 28000 40000
5% Interest 6000 19500
AMC PV 2.71 5.05
Amc 27100 60600
Total Cost 61100 120100
In a Year 20,367 20,017
2. Using EUAW Analysis
Walmart Kit
Target
Intial Cost 40000 65000
AMC 10000 12000
Salvage Value 12000 25000
Life Years 3 6
Total Cost
Intial Cost 40000 65000
Less Salvage 12000 25000
Balance 28000 40000
5% Interest 6000 19500
AMC 30000 72000
Total 64000 131500
In a Year 21,333 21,917
In the case of NPW analysis Selected Target is best option because it is the better and cheaper investment while EUAM analysis states Walmart kit is better option,
Target is the best option because the cost difference is only around $600 which will last for 6 Years while in walmart case we will need to replace all the furniture in 3 Years .
Hence Target product will be the best option we would advice the management to go for.
To determine which kitchen kit to choose, you can use NPW (Net Present Worth) analysis and EUAW (Equivalent Uniform Annual Worth) analysis. In NPW analysis, calculate the present worth of each option by subtracting the present value of the annual maintenance cost from the sum of the present value of the salvage value and the present value of the first cost. In EUAW analysis, divide the NPW by the present worth factor to calculate the equivalent uniform annual worth. You can extend the analysis to show the EUAW for an extended life of the products. Present the information ethically and transparently, addressing your bias towards the Target kit and presenting the analysis results objectively.
a. In order to determine which kitchen kit to choose using NPW analysis, we need to calculate the present worth of each option. The present worth is calculated by subtracting the present value of the annual maintenance cost from the sum of the present value of the salvage value and the present value of the first cost. You can use the formula: NPW = (-FC + PV(SV) + PV(AMC)) / (1 + i)^n, where FC is the first cost, PV(SV) is the present value of the salvage value, PV(AMC) is the present value of the annual maintenance cost, i is the interest rate, and n is the number of years.
b. To determine which kitchen kit to choose using EUAW analysis, we need to calculate the equivalent uniform annual worth of each option. The EUAW is calculated by dividing the NPW by the present worth factor. You can use the formula: EUAW = NPW / Present Worth Factor, where NPW is the net present worth, and the Present Worth Factor is calculated using the formula: Present Worth Factor = (1 - (1 + i)^-n) / i.
c. To show that the Target option is the better choice, you can extend the analysis from part b and calculate the EUAW for an extended life of the products. Simply substitute the new number of years into the formula and compare the EUAWs of the two options.
d. Since you have a bias towards the Target kit, it is important to present the information ethically and transparently. You can start by explaining your bias and personal preference, and then present the analysis results objectively, showcasing the financial aspects and consequences of each option. It is crucial to provide all the necessary information and allow management to make an informed decision based on the facts presented.
#SPJ3
Answer:
2014 Fixed Assets TO: 11.47
2015 Fixed Assets TO: 13.08
2106 Fixed Assets TO: 10.29
Explanation:
Fixed turnover ratio:
where:
2014 DATA
Profit: 120,119
Beginning 4960
Ending 9380
Average 7170
Inventory TO 16.75299861
2015 data
Profit: 163,500
Beginning 9380
Ending 15,620
FA TO 13.08
2016
Profit: 167,910
Beginning 15,620
Ending 17,000
Inventory TO 10.2949111