Answer:
The history of U.S. foreign policy from 1776 to 1801 concerns the foreign policy of the United States during the twenty five years after the United States Declaration of Independence (1776). For the first half of this period, the U.S. foreign policy was directed by the Second Continental Congress and the Congress of the Confederation. After the ratification of the United States Constitution in 1788, U.S. foreign policy was conducted by the presidential administrations of George Washington and John Adams.
The inauguration of Thomas Jefferson in 1801 marked the start of the next era of U.S. foreign policy. After the American Revolution began in 1775, the United States courted European powers for help in the war against the Kingdom of Great Britain. Benjamin Franklin negotiated an alliance with the Kingdom of France in 1778, and the French played a decisive role in the American victory in the war.
Enlightenment-era Spain and the Dutch Republic also aided the U.S. cause, while other European countries joined the First League of Armed Neutrality to protect neutral shipping against the Royal Navy. The war came to an end with the signing of the 1783 Treaty of Paris, under which the United States gained control of territory as far west as the Mississippi River.
In the five years after the end of the war, relations with Great Britain and Spain were key issues; both countries hindered U.S. settlement in the west through control of strategic locations and by cultivating alliances with Native Americans. The United States expanded trade with various countries. Partly due to the lack of a strong central government, was unable to negotiate a commercial treaty with Great Britain or retaliate against high British tariffs.
Explanation: Following the ratification of the United States Constitution, George Washington took office in 1789. That same year, the French Revolution erupted, eventually leading to years of warfare between France, Britain, and other European powers that would continue until 1815. The French Revolution deeply split the United States, as Democratic-Republicans like Thomas Jefferson favored France and the revolution, while Federalists like Alexander Hamilton abhorred the revolution and favored Britain. As a neutral power, the United States sought to trade with both countries, but French and British ships attacked American ships trading with their respective enemies. President Washington sought to avoid foreign entanglement, issuing the Proclamation of Neutrality in 1793. In 1795, the Washington administration negotiated the Jay Treaty, under which the British agreed to open some ports to U.S. trade and evacuate western forts in U.S. territory. That same year, the Washington administration concluded the Treaty of San Lorenzo with Spain, settling borders disputes and granting American ships unrestricted navigation rights on the Mississippi River. In 1798, an undeclared naval war with France known as the Quasi-War broke out after France escalated attacks on American shipping. The war came to a close with the signing of the Convention of 1800, but attacks on American shipping by France and Britain would resume during the 19th century.
The Democratic-Republican Party challenged the U.S. government's foreign policy during 1789-1800 by criticizing the pro-British stance of the Federalist Party and advocating for a more neutral position. They opposed the Jay Treaty as it favored Great Britain over American interests.
During the period 1789 to 1800, the Democratic-Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, challenged the United States government's foreign policy. They criticized the Federalist Party's pro-British stance and advocated for a more neutral position in foreign affairs. One of their major challenges to the government's foreign policy was the opposition to the Jay Treaty, which they believed favored Great Britain and undermined American interests.
#SPJ2
Brezhnev negotiated the treaty with the United States as part of an alliance against China.
Nixon used the new US closeness to the Soviet Union to negotiate the agreement with China.
Brezhnev negotiated the treaty with China as part of an alliance against the United States.
Nixon used the new US closeness to China to negotiate the agreement with the Soviet Union. When relations between China and the Soviet Union deteriorated, the United States established diplomatic relations with China to weaken the influence of the Russians. Later the U.S. and U.S.S.R. signed the Anti-Ballistics treaty that limited the number of missiles on both sides but improved relations between them.
The option that best describes the connection between the United States, China, and the SALT I agreement is that;
The SALT I agreement is known to be the first agreements that was signed by the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in the year 1972 and 1979.
The act was signed so as to hinder the arms race in strategic ballistic missiles that is armed with nuclear weapons. Nixon was said to have used the new US closeness to China to negotiate the agreement with the Soviet Union.
Learn more about Soviet Union from
Belarus
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Serbia
Answer:
The Baltic nations are:
-Estonia
-Latvia
-Lithuania
The Knights of Labor aimed for inclusivity and social reform, while the American Federation of Labor focused on representing skilled workers and negotiating with employers.
A major difference between the Knights of Labor and the American Federation of Labor was their approach to organizing workers. The Knights of Labor aimed to create a broadly inclusive union that encompassed both skilled and unskilled workers, as well as women and minorities. They focused on social reforms and believed in using strikes and boycotts to achieve their goals.
On the other hand, the American Federation of Labor was more selective and only accepted skilled workers into their union. They prioritized representing the immediate economic interests of their members, such as higher wages and better working conditions. They advocated for collective bargaining and negotiation with employers rather than direct confrontation.
Overall, while both organizations aimed to improve workers' conditions, the Knights of Labor had a broader vision of social change, while the American Federation of Labor focused primarily on economic gains for its members.
#SPJ2
Businesses can only make a limited number of goods and services.
People have limited wants.
Not everyone's needs are met.
Using scarce resources today means having fewer tomorrow.
The following statement describes the effects of scarcity are-
Scarcity of resources is referred as a situation in which a shortage of goods and services due to increased demand and insufficient supply of products and services within a specified period of time have occurred.
The scarcity in the market is caused by factors like changes in the needs and desires of customers due to which their demands for particular goods have been increased which results in shortage.
The shortage is also caused by a lack of adequate management of resources which disturbs the optimum utilization and may creates waste of raw materials.
This scarcity will result in a limited number of goods and services available in the market and may be in a high price. The customer's demands are not met which led to dissatisfaction among them.
Learn more about scarcity, here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
- Businesses can only make a limited number of goods and services.
- Not everyone's needs are met.
- Using scarce resources today means having fewer tomorrow.
The correct function is C) informer-stimulator function.
The political party notifies the people about certain issues, and in doing so, seeks to rouse the interest and support of the public. The function the are applying is the informer-stimulator function.
When doing this function, the political party wants to inform the people about important social, cultural, political, and economic issues of public interest, and explaining how the party is interested in resolving these issues. The political party tries to gain the acceptation of the people and probably, their vote in the next election.