Answer:
A>
Explanation:
causes of the Civil War, why might this inscription be
considered "controversial" by a number of Americans?
Answer:
Explanation
Explanation:
It has been noted that over seven southern states in the US have passed laws to makes it difficult for people to remove statues considered to be confederate monuments. Protesters and public officials have made different attempts to remove these public objects that have been perceived to be symbols of Racism in the United States of America.
The issue is an aftermath of the civil war that happened in the United State in 1861 after several decades of tensions that happened between the southern and northern states over the rights of states, slavery and the westward expansion.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the inscription to know what you are referring to.
However, doing some research we can comment on the following.
If the inscription refers to the Anderson Division of Hills Corps of the Florida Infantry, then our comment would be the following.
this inscription be
This inscription might be considered "controversial" by a number of Americans because it only refers to the 1st Florida Infantry Regiment that was formed by the Confederate state of Florida in times of the Civil War. Along with the 3rd Regiment, they fought in Tennesse as part of the battles fought in the American Civil War.
The inscription does not consider the black soldiers of the Union Army that were also killed in the battle site, so that is why people, in this tumultuous times of change, consider the inscription controversial.
I don't know if this will help you but you can also add in: discord within the Islamic community as well as economic and military defeats to Europe and Russia led to the military downfall of the Ottomans. After this they began to they began to refrain from intellectual pursuits and relied on military strength to support them so that they could keep internal conflict low. However, the military weakened and was no longer able to support the empire.
An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Do not hurt others in ways you would find hurtful.
Do not make promises you cannot keep.
It is better to amass riches so you can then help people.
Answer:
The statement that is more similar to the golden rule is:
"Do not hut others in ways you would find hurtgul.
Explanation:
The reason behind the similarity is that the golden rule is sustained in only performing good actions to receive good actions.
An eye for an eye talks about providing the same treatment you receive, it is specially used to perform or fundament vengeance. Therefore is the opposite o the golden rule.
Do not make promises you cannot keep doesn't talk about executing only good actions. But about being responsible for your words.
Amass riches to help people is not also about only performing well. It talks about helping people which is not implied in the golden rule. Because the golden rule is not about helping but about performing only good actions.
Therefore, do not hurt others in ways you would find hurtful is the correct answer.
Since the golden rule is “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” the statement that is closest to this is Do not hurt others in ways you would find hurtful.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It got amended for 3 times time since it became the legal document.
Hope it helps!