Answer:
69
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
69
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
how many yards is the track
Due to insufficient information, we cannot calculate the determinant of the given matrix. The determinant calculation varies based on the matrix's size and the specifics of its elements.
The question asked was to find the determinant of a given matrix when the det(a) = 2. However, the information provided is insufficient to determine the actual matrix determinant due to numerical errors and unrelatable data. The determinant of a matrix is calculated differently depending on the type of matrix. For a 2x2 matrix, if the matrix is [a b; c d], the determinant would be 'ad - bc'. For a 3x3 matrix, the determinant process involves more steps including finding minors and cofactors of matrix elements. However, without the actual specifics of the matrix, the determinant cannot be calculated.
#SPJ11
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
n=250 represent the random sample taken
estimated proportion of readers owned a particular make of car
is the value that we want to test
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value (variable of interest)
Concepts and formulas to use
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that that the percentage is actually different from the reported percentage.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion is significantly different from a hypothesized value .
Calculate the statistic
Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
At a pay of 12$ per hour at 8 hours a day you will make 94$ a day or 658$ a week.
3c - 2b
Answer:
3(-4) - 2(5) = -12 - 10 = -22
Answer: It is a weak negative correlation and it is not likely causal.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: The number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime is compared to the number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes. The correlation coefficient relating the two variables is -0.26.
Variables : "number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime" and "number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes".
Since -0.26 is more closer to 0 as compared to 1 , so it describes a weak negative correlation.
Also, it is not likely causal as number of times a player has golfed in one's lifetime not cause number of strokes it takes the player to complete 18 holes.
Answer: B) It is a weak negative correlation, and it is likely casual
Correct on edge 2020!