Answer:
True
Explanation:
The boston tea party
Answer:3
Explanation: Christopher Columbus
geographic mobility takes time.
unemployed workers accept the first job offer that they receive.
workers have different preferences and abilities.
Answer:
the reasons for frictional unemployment does not include the fact that unemployed workers accept the first job offer that they receive.
Explanation:
Frictional unemployment is a type of unemployment, that can be based on the circumstances of the individual. It is time spent between jobs when a worker is searching for a job or transferring from one job to another.
Answer:
unemployed workers accept the first job offer that they receive.
Explanation:
unemployed workers accept the first job offer that they receive.
Frictional unemployment occurs during a period when workers are searching for new employment or transitioning from their old jobs to new ones. It can also be referred to as natural unemployment. People who accept the first job offer are most likely not immediqtely looking for another job immediately, they will want to settle down and work first.
Answer:
Neuroscience
Explanation:
Neuroscience perspective -
According to this approach ,
The behavior is considered with respective to the angle of the brain and the nervous system , is known as Neuroscience perspective.
i.e.
The aspect by which the functioning of the body affects the fears and hopes.
It determines how the functions of body are done biologically.
Hence, from the given information of the question ,
The correct term is Neuroscience perspective .
In 1994, there was fear of a military uprising in Mexico, resulting in the Zapatista guerrilla army led by Subcommandante Marcos waging war against the government in Chiapas. Additionally, the rise of drug cartels and their associated violence caused some concern among the people. The government also faced criticism due to allegations of fraud during the election that year. The murder of 45 indigenous activists and the violent suppression of protests during the Zapatista uprising also strained the country's democratic stability.
Answer: The answer is No there has not been misappropriation
Explanation:
in this case, there has not been misappropriation because Phillips has not done the needful in the first instance. The two ground in which Phillips has not done the needful to protect his invention are these
1.Philip had not patented his tree stand,a patent right is a right or special privilege granted to an investor who had applied for it to protect such inventor intellectual work and to enable him benefit from the proceed of the invention for a given period of time.such a right confer monopoly on the patentee in the sense that, the patent so granted will enable the individual alone to use the design for a specific number of years no other individual or company will be allowed to use the design as long as the patent is in operation.
2.Philip did not require the investors to sign NDAs, which is known as non disclosure agreement which is an agreement signed between two individuals or companies in order to ensure that the information contained in the agreement do not get to the third parties. It is also used to ensure that the trade secret between two individuals or companies is protected from leaking out. Therefore based on these two grounds Philip has failed to do the needful to protect his invention and has created a loophole for himself which the investors had used to steal his invention and made it theirs. The case instituted against the investors by Philip cannot be proved beyond reasonable doubt by Philip in the court of law that the investors had steal his invention because he had failed to do the needful in the first instance to win the case in his favour.