Answer:
(A) splinter
Explanation: hope this helps!
Answer:
The Tinker case is an important First Amendment case because it defines a student's right to free speech in a public school setting. This ruling would have to be taken into account in any later court cases involving the rights of students in a similar situation.
Explanation:
The majority opinion in the Tinker case effectively applied the principles of the First Amendment, upholding students' rights to symbolic speech even in a school setting. It stressed the importance of First Amendment protections despite potential disruptions.
The Tinker v. Des Moines case was a significant First Amendment case decided by the Supreme Court. The majority opinion held that students do not lose their First Amendment rights when they step onto school property. The Court based this decision on the principle that the First Amendment protects not only the right to speak, but also the right to express oneself symbolically. In Tinker, the students were expressing their opposition to the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands. The majority opinion said that this was protected symbolic speech.
Despite ramifications, like potential disturbances in school, the Court believed First Amendment protections were more significant due to their long-term importance. It emphasized that schools could not ban such symbolic expressions just based on a fear of possible disruption.
Thus, the majority opinion in the Tinker case applied the principles of the First Amendment effectively, considering the need for freedom of speech and expression, even in the context of a school. It affirmed that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.
#SPJ3
Answer:
False
Explanation:
it was a brand new contrey but he had to start a way for America to create money.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
George washington was elected but there was no major durning that time
Answer:
it was necessary to draft the bill of rights because the anti federalists would not agree to a stronger government if they didn't get a bill of rights
Answer:wwp
Explanation:
Answer:
The biggest source of conflict between Native Americans and European settlers was the issue of land ownership and land use. Europeans felt land should be privately owned, while Native Americans believed land should by owned and used by everyone.
Explanation:
The source of tension between English colonists and Native Americans was Land disputes.
Land disputes: When English colonists made their settlements bigger, they sometimes took Native American lands, which caused conflicts about who owned the land and its resources.
Cultural clashes happened when the English colonists and Native Americans didn't understand or agree with each other's beliefs, practices, and ways of living. This caused conflicts and tension between them.
Competition for resources: The English settlers wanted to use the natural resources of the land, like fur, trees, and farmland. This sometimes caused problems with the Native Americans, who had been using those resources in their own ways for a long time.
Read on colonist on brainly.com/question/24571554
#SPJ3
Answer:
Voting and Paying taxes
Explanation:
Answer:
US citizens are people who live in the US legally.