5. What happened at the historic Charles Town General Meeting of july 6, 1774? (1 point) Colonists drafted a letter to Britain explaining their position.

Representatives from all parts of South Carolina met for the first time.

A shipment of tea was seized and stored beneath the Old Exchange.

Delegates decided not to buy from or sell any more goods to Britain.​

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

At the historic Charles Town General Meeting of july 6, 1774: Delegates decided not to buy from or sell any more goods to Britain.​

What happened in the meeting

At the historic Charles Town General Meeting of July 6, 1774, delegates made the significant decision not to buy from or sell any more goods to Britain. This event was a response to the growing tensions between the American colonies and Britain, particularly in the aftermath of the Boston Tea Party in 1773. The decision reflected a form of economic protest and a strategy of non-importation and non-exportation as a means of opposing British policies.

By refusing to engage in trade with Britain, the colonists aimed to exert economic pressure on the British government and show their dissatisfaction with perceived injustices and infringements on colonial rights.

Learn more about Charles Town

brainly.com/question/18131877

#SPJ3

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

Delegates decided not to buy from or sell any more goods to Britain.

Explanation:

Lol


Related Questions

What two countries contained half of the world's 10 largest cities by 1900?
Who was te first president of USA?
What does this image reveal aboutthe skill level of African artisans?What is this evidence of?
Plz help meeeWith this I with this I don’t want to do it
Who ruled ancient Egypt

in brown versus the Board of Education the Supreme Court overturned the prettiest woman in Plessy v ferguson that separate but equal was constitutional so long as equal accommondations were provided what constitutial amendment was interpreted in both of these cases

Answers

yes, this is true. In brown vs board of education of Topeka, the case got a legal victory due to the fact that it wasn't separate but equal, as the girl had to walk 20 blocks - a few miles - to get to her school, as she attends a black school. white people were able to get to schools near them, which is totally unfair. so the supreme court said 'separate but equal' is unconstitutional.

Using both excerpts, what evidence can you find that does NOT support America’s annexation of Hawaii in 1893?

Answers

Answer:I have no idea

Explanation:sheesh

As the Civil War dragged on, why was the North in better shape to win than the South

Answers

As the Civil War dragged on the North was in better shape to win in comparison with the South due to its ability to produce war goods on its own and was not dependent on other countries to produce weapons and ammunition. The North instituted a naval blockade in order to hurt the southern economy and also to prevent the sale of weapons to the Confederate Army. 

Why should you always finish reading difficult content? a. Difficult content is usually covered on the test c. Difficult content usually contains important vocabulary words b. The con

Answers

You should always finish reading difficult content because B. the content may become more clear as the concept builds upon itself. The more and more you read, everything will start become clear to you and soon you won't have any difficulties understanding even the most demanding of texts.

The Constitution proposed to your acceptance is designed, not for yourselves alone, but for generations yet unborn. The principles, therefore, upon which the social compact is founded, ought to have been clearly and precisely stated, and the most express and full declaration of rights to have been made. But on this subject there is almost an entire silence." who would have said it federalist or anti federalist

Answers

Answer:

federalist they supported the constitution

Final answer:

Given the skepticism and call for more explicit individual rights laid out in the quote, it was likely stated by an Anti-Federalist, who were known for pushing for such protections.

Explanation:

The quote you've asked about appears to be an argument against a lack of explicit declaration of rights within the Constitution, suggesting that it would be more likely to have been said by an Anti-Federalist. The Federalists were largely supportive of the new Constitution as it was, while the Anti-Federalists argued for more explicit protections of individual and state rights, which eventually led to the creation of the Bill of Rights. Therefore, this statement, expressing dissatisfaction with the 'entire silence' on the subject of rights, was likely made by an Anti-Federalist.

Learn more about Anti-Federalist here:

brainly.com/question/32211450

#SPJ2

Which of the following best describes the Freedmen’s Bureau? a. The Freedmen’s Bureau was a federal relief agency that assisted former slaves in the process of reuniting with family members. b. The Freedmen’s Bureau was a radical group that wanted to continue the practice of slavery after the end of the Civil War. c. The Freedmen’s Bureau was an abolitionist group that assisted former slaves in the process of gaining employment. d. The Freedmen’s Bureau was a committee created within the United State Congress consisting of only former slaves.

Answers

I believe the answer is C. You're welcome. ;)