Answer:
gold
Explanation:
Answer:
Porcelain or Jade
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not include options or any other reference, we can say that what most likely happened to cool their friendship was the fact that one of them had different expectations about the relationship, while the other did not aspire to reach to the next level and have a romantic relationship. One of them misunderstood the signals of the relationship and confused the fact that they both had so many similarities. That is why is so important to be clear about the role people play in a friendly relationship in order to avoid sending the wrong of confusing signals to the other individual.
In Andrea and Paul's story, the surprise confession of romantic feelings from one friend to the other led to a surprise and tension in their relationship. This shift changed the dynamics of their friendship, introducing caution and wariness where there was previously ease and mutual affection.
The cooling of Andrea and Paul's friendship most likely occurred due to one friend expressing romantic feelings, which was unexpected and perhaps unwanted by the other. The surprise and the addition of unanticipated romantic sentiment to their relationship made the recipient of the confession uneasy, which consequently led to a change, and likely a strain, in their previously uncomplicated friendship. This is a classic case of emotional misalignment in a friendship.
They both had a lot in common, as mentioned, they were even part of the same chess club and shared similar tastes in music. Yet this revelation of romantic interest would have introduced an aspect to their relationship that was not mutual. The cautiousness since the confession could stem from insecurity about how to continue a close friendship without leading on or hurting the one with unrequited feelings.
These sorts of situations call for open communication, respect for each other's feelings, and understanding to navigate the situation well. If not addressed properly, it could lead to the ending of a friendship.
#SPJ3
Student:
While society may broadly appreciate and desire educational objectives that can help people lead healthy lives, the exact approaches necessary to reach these desired outcomes are not well understood. Mandigo and Anderson (2003) highlight the need for educators "to develop ways to foster these skills and understandings across numerous types of activities" (p. 8) as an important step towards making this desire a reality.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
A. Word-for-Word plagiarism
B. Paraphrasing plagiarism
C. This is not plagiarism
Answer: THIS IS NOT PLAGIARISM.
Explanation: Plagiarism is the use of someones literature work without acknowledging the person. It is a theft of knowledge in it's simplest term. But when acknowledged it is assumed to be a borrow of knowledge, which is always acceptable because no one knows everything.
The student has acknowledged the source that was cited to build it's literature work, so therefore it is legal for the student to copy as much information from the book, be it paraphrasing of Word-for-word.
Answer: C. This is not Plagiarism.
Explanation: In the student version, he or she neither copied the original content word for word without enclosing them in a quotation marks nor copied the structure of the statement.
The student kept the original meaning without copying word for word as well as the structure.
Also he cited and enclosed the the statement he copied to show he just borrowed them and it was his or her original idea. So this is not Plagiarism
buy and________.
Answer:
housing, transportation, recreation, apparel, and education. The market basket used for the CPI also includes components outside the scope of consumer goods and services.
The CPI market basket consists of items that aneverageurbanhousehold buy and housing.
Answer:
I believe it is Federalism.
Explanation:
I hope the image helps.