Answer:
$750,000 units
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the number of units the company would have to manufacture during the year
PRODUCTION BUDGET
Budgeted unit sales 700,000
Add desired ending finished goods inventory 73,000
Total $773,000)
(700,00+73,000
Less beginning finished goods inventory $23,000
Units to manufacture 750,000
Therefore number of units the company would have to manufacture during the year would be: $750,000
B) His instrumentality estimates will be lower and his expectancy estimates will remain the same
C) His expectancy estimates for the next quarter will be lower
D) Neither her expectancy nor instrumentality estimates will change
E) His expectancy estimates for the next quarter will be higher
Answer:
Option E
His expectancy estimates for the next quarter will be higher
Explanation:
Will Presley's expectancy rate will be higher in the next sales quarter. This is because he feels that the birth of his new baby is instrumental to his his poor sales performance. Now that he feels that factor has been taken out of the way, he expects that there will be a great increase in the next sales quarter.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Personally identifiable information (PII) is generally considered sensitive information, but not always. It depends on the context and how the information is used. PII is considered sensitive if i can be used to identify, locate or contact and individual and put him/her in danger.
E.g. Social security number , contact information, bank account information, medical information, employment information, student ID, date of birth, parent names, etc.
Answer:
$55,000
Explanation:
The computation of the change in operating income is shown below:
= Buying cost - making cost
where,
Buying cost = Cost of producing parts × outside supplier per unit
= 60,000 parts × $3
= $180,000
And, the making cost would be
= Variable cost + fixed cost × given percentage
= $110,000 + $50,000 × 30%
= $110,000 + $15,000
= $125,000
So, the operating income would be
= $180,000 - $125,000
= $55,000
Answer:
a. Average collection period = 18 days
b. Average balance = $1,717,112.33
Explanation:
b. If the company sells 1,240 forecasts every month at a price of $2,340 each, what is its average balance sheet amount in accounts receivable?
a. Average collection period = 80%(10 days) + 20%(50 days)
Average collection period = 0.80(10 days) + 0.20(50 days)
Average collection period = 8 days + 10 days
Average collection period = 18 days
b. Average balance = 1240 * $2,340 * 12*(18/365)
Average balance = 1240 * $2,340 * 12 * 0.0493151
Average balance = 1717112.32992
Average balance = $1,717,112.33
Answer:
14.06%
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of common equity using the DCF method is shown below:
Cost of Common Equity = [Ending year dividend ÷ Price per share] + growth rate
= [$2.31 ÷ $25.50] + 0.05
= 14.06%
We simply applied the above formula by considering the ending year dividend, price and the growth rate so that the correct percentage could come
Had Marcus clicked on the link at the bottom of the screen, he would have seen the following:
The second screen stated "Three-day trial version- Free! $59.99 annual fee thereafter." Marcus was annoyed that the app would cost him almost $60 but figured he would set a reminder on his phone to cancel the app before the trial period expired so he wouldn't get charged. Plus, he wanted to see the app in action. If it was actually worth the price, he wouldn't mind paying the annual fee. He clicked "Continue" and put in his bank card information on the next screen. The following screen asked Marcus a series of questions about his stress level and what he felt caused stress in his life. He clicked "high" and "work" as the level and cause. He then completed the first CalmDown meditation in the app, but was not impressed with its functionality. Deciding he would cancel his subscription immediately, he went into the profile settings to try to find the cancel option but couldn't. He searched every possible place on the app but didn't see a way to cancel the subscription. Marcus decided to try to find the app's developer through their website, but a quick search didn't turn up anything. Already stressed and becoming more frustrated, Marcus decided to contact the app store. They informed him that he should be able to go into his app store account and cancel the subscription there. However, when Marcus went there, he didn't see the app as an option or as a subscription. Thinking that maybe his subscription didn't process, he just deleted the app from his phone.
Marcus didn't give the app or the subscription any more thought, becoming increasingly more distracted by the amount of stress at work. Four months later, Marcus was looking at his bank account online and noticed it was lower than it should have been. He began reviewing the charges and noticed multiple charges for $59.99 to a merchant named "CDgotU." He immediately remembered the app and contacted his bank to dispute the charges. His bank replied that due to the charges being debit withdraws he needed to dispute them within 2 days of being made. Moreover, if he had been diligent about watching his account, they could have put a block on the account and the remaining fraudulent charges would have been prevented. The bank representative also told him that he should try to get a refund from the company that charged him. After making his case with the bank representative for several hours about how he tried to cancel his subscription, he was unsuccessful. The bank's representative was able to provide Marcus a phone number attached to the Merchant account, but when Marcus called the number it was disconnected. The bank could not provide him with any additional information such as a company address or website.
After more internet searching, Marcus saw a number of other complaints online about the app, and noticed it had been removed from the app store and was no longer available for download. Marcus decided to bring an action against the company for fraud, breach of contract, conversion, and several other claims in his home state of Vermont.
Can Marcus compel the bank or the app store to provide additional information about the creator of CalmDown in order to determine the creator's location and potential assets?
a. No, these records are not subject to being subpoenaed due to their confidential nature.
b. Yes, he can subpoena records during the discovery process from both, but the bank and the app store may ask the judge to deny the request or limit the request due to privacy concerns.
c. Yes, but he must subpoena these records prior to the filing of the complaint.
d. Yes, he can file interrogatories during the discovery process to both the bank and the app store.
Answer: b. Yes, he can subpoena records during the discovery process from both, but the bank and the app store may ask the judge to deny the request or limit the request due to privacy concerns.
Explanation:
Marcus can indeed compel the bank or the app store to provide additional information about the creator of the app should he wish to find out the creator's location and its potential assets so he can purse the case appropriately legal wise.
He can do this by subpoenaing the required information when laying the background for the suit. As this information is considered private and confidential however, both the bank and the store could appeal to the Judge to refuse Marcus's request on the grounds of privacy concerns.
Answer:
the anser is B
Explanation: