Internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Japanese Americans returned to their homes.
Executive Order 9022 was overturned.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was that internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Korematsu v. United States was one of the key cases of the Supreme Court of the United States, where compliance with the Executive Order 9066 was considered, according to which Japanese-Americans were obliged to relocate to internment camps during the Second World War, regardless of their citizenship.
By a decision of 6 judges against 3, the Supreme Court agreed with the government, declaring that the order complies with the Constitution. The decision made by Judge Hugo Black ruled that the need for protection against espionage outweighed the individual rights of Fred Korematsu, as well as the rights of other Americans of Japanese origin.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was the affirmation of the constitutionality of Japanese American internment during World War II, setting a controversial precedent for potential civil rights violations during times of national security.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was:
1. Japanese Americans were not allowed to return to their homes immediately after the ruling. The internment camps were not immediately disbanded.
2. The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, validating the government's actions based on military necessity.
3. Discrimination and racial profiling against Japanese Americans continued, despite the ruling.
4. The decision set a precedent that allowed the government to potentially justify the violation of civil rights during times of national security or military conflict.
5. The ruling remained controversial and was widely criticized for its infringement on civil liberties, eventually leading to calls for its reconsideration and efforts to overturn it. However, the specific Executive Order 9022 was not directly affected by the ruling.
Learn more on Korematsu v. United States here;
#SPJ6
Television encouraged people to help others.
Television promoted a common culture.
Television heightened interest in books and newspapers.
Television impact in 1950s America was significant as it promoted a common culture, represented a new form of entertainment and communication, and became the focal point of news and entertainment, diverting attention from traditional print media.
The 1950s was a pivotal time in American society as television began to influence the culture, politics, and economy. Television introduced a new form of entertainment and communication, providing an avenue for information dissemination and shaping public opinion on various issues.
Primarily, television promoted a common culture. It showcased a prevalent American lifestyle resulting in a shared cultural experience across the country. Television shows often depicted middle-class families living in suburban America, making this lifestyle desirable and aspired by many.
Contrary to promoting reading habits, television actually diverted attention away from books and newspapers, becoming the primary source of news and entertainment for a large number of people.
#SPJ6
•increased tariffs on imported grain crops
•reduced storage and shipping costs for farmers
•greater access to Native American lands
•incentive to limit production of cash crops
Answer: reduced storage and shipping costs for farmers
Explanation:
Populism emerged from the demand of the small scale farmers for agrarian reform in the Great Plains, Rockies, and the cotton-belt states.
The farmers started their revolt by founding the National Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry in 1867. The Grange used its political power to approve farmer-friendly laws, such as the Granger Laws, which established maximum railroad prices.
increased tariffs on imported grain crops phrase would accurately complete the diagram.
The diagram's completion reflects a chronological sequence that illustrates how important events in the United States late 19th century interacted with one another. The need for agrarian reform and the effects of the economic downturn contributed to the rise of populism, a movement fueled by the worries of workers and farmers.
The adoption of the Granger laws which aimed to control railroad and warehouse rates is an example of an early legislative response to farmers complaints and to lower the cost of storage and shipping.
By shielding domestic farmers from foreign competition, the subsequent implementation of higher tariffs on imported grain crops further aligned with the populist agenda. This series of events highlights the efforts made during a pivotal time in American history to support agricultural interests, improve economic conditions and empower rural communities.
To know more about Granger laws here
#SPJ3
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In 1942 The Office of Production Management announced a new order that will halt production of all non-military vehicles indefinitely, starting in February.
All cars, including commercial trucks, replacement parts and new civilian passenger vehicles are included in the rationing program.
Chairman of the War Production Board, Donald Nelson, ordered the prohibition of all production of automobiles and light trucks after Feb. 2. The order was approved by President Franklin D. Roosevelt with the intention to reorganize machinery for war production.
The ban’s initial start date was issued for Jan. 15. However, when more than 400 automobile dealers met with the House Small Business Committee to discuss the issue, Feb. 2 was selected as the new start date.
Clare Cargile, president of the National Automobile Dealers Association, said that dealers testified that the country’s defense and agriculture industries would “suffer from the restrictions.” According to Cargile, the dealers received a “very sympathetic response” from the House.
The production of stock will ensure all military demands will be met. Leon Henderson, head of the Office of Civilian Supply and of the Office of Price Administration, said new car dealer facilities will be used to store approximately 130,000 new passenger cars.
Nelson’s new order formalized a Jan. 1 announcement made by Henderson. The order barred dealers from selling new cars and introduced the freezing of automobile production.
The order applies to halting both civilian and military passenger car production. Nelson confirmed that “all foreseeable military demands” for vehicles could be met before the month’s production. He said that manufacturers who are unable to complete their production quota before Feb. 2 may request permission for additional operating time.
When the order was initially issued on Jan. 1, more than 38,000 trucks were already assembled and ready for distribution. Some manufacturers asked permission to produce vehicles without tires in order to maintain civilian stock, but were dismissed. The current order applies to all production regardless of previously established contracts. The rationing plan will materially reduce the number of cars available for civilian sale.
William Reagan, treasurer of the Chicago Automobile Trade Association, was present during the testimonies. “This committee would do well to get a true and complete picture of the automobile situation for the benefit of the motoring public, as well as for the benefit of the 44,000 car dealers in this country,” he said. “As the situation has been presented to date the 451 dealers in Cook County may be thrown out of business in 30 days.”
New vehicles will not be permitted for sale until next year at the earliest. All sales of 1942 model vehicles are prohibited, except for purchases by government agencies.
Otherwise, cars designated for sale will only be released to those certified or deemed eligible by OPA officials. Current estimates leave automobile manufacturers sitting on $175 million in unused inventory.
Automobile graveyards are also mentioned in the new order. It aims to collect older models, dating before 1935. Government officials accused graveyard operators of not cooperating and not surrendering the rusting vehicles for scrap metal.
The requisitioning law allows the government to immediately seize the vehicles and offer compensation at a later date. There are more than four million cars that would be used for scrap metal, accumulating a total of approximately three million tons.
While the rationing program continues, the restrictions have eliminated positions for about 200,000 truck and taxi drivers.
Answer:
The group that invaded England in 1066 AD, bringing a variety of the French language with them were the Normans, led by William the Conqueror.
Explanation:
The Norman conquest of England was the invasion and occupation of the kingdom of England by William the Conqueror.
The King of England Edward the Confessor died at the beginning of 1066 without leaving any children. His brother-in-law Harold Godwinson was chosen to succeed him, but other contenders made themselves known. The Norwegian king Harald Hardrada invaded England in September. He was defeated and killed by Harold at the Battle of Stamford Bridge on September 25th. William, duke of Normandy, arrived in Sussex a few days later. Harold went out to meet him and faced him at the Battle of Hastings on October 14th. This decisive confrontation resulted in the death of Harold and the victory of William, who was crowned at Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day.
The disappearance of the main rivals of William did not bring tranquility to England, which was shaken by many revolts until 1072. To better control his kingdom, William founded many castles at strategic locations and redistributed land confiscated to the revolted nobility to his faithful. The Norman invasion had profound consequences for the history of England. A new ruling class, which held its fiefs directly from the king and spoke Norman, supplanted the old Anglo-Saxon nobility, partly forced into exile.
Answer:
Colorado and Nevada
Explanation:
Tell me if its right