Answer:
B
Explanation: I don't know, I mean it seems sensible but i want to be a lawyer when i grow up and it looks like the disadvantage would be conflicts because say both owners decide on selling it, and owner A wants to sell it for lets say $450 and owner B wants to sell it for $750 that right there would be a conflict and could lead to in some cases a break of the contract they signed which can lead to court and all that stuff but the advantage would be that you could have many expert partners like the answer says and they could correct you on your mistakes, lets go back to the imaginary problem i made up. Owner A wants to sell the object for $450 dollars and owner B wants to sell it for $750 but Owner A is a more experienced and shows owner B that it was worth that but its been used so therefore you should lower the price and it would be easier to sell. (sorry if i sound stupid I wouldn't recommend using that as the answer but if you decide to please tell me if i'm right or wrong also I'm 12 so...)
Answer:
30 districts
Explanation:
30 districts with 4 main administrative divisions
Answer:
karnataka has 30 districts
Answer:
Hhgg
Explanation:
Answer:
Take it to the nearest mechanic
Explanation:
B. Never
C. Before, after
D. Before, during
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
governments exist to secure the rights of the people
Answer: The correct answer is Government exist to secure the rights of the people
Explanation: I got it right on prepwork
Summery: Everyone stay safe from the virus love you all have a good rest of your bay!!!!
B. Police may place surveillance devices on suspected criminals’ phones
C. Police can plant viruses on smartphones of suspected drug runners.
D. Private citizens can monitor other people’s telephone calls.
E. Private citizens can record their own telephone calls in most states.
Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls.
Option A
Explanation:
The Supreme Court of America has made and landmark judgements in electronic surveillance like tapping phone calls and accessing the phone records.
It stated that without a proper warrant if the police department carry out electronic surveillance means it amounts to be illegal, it is a breach of privacy of individuals.
So, the top court has issued guidelines before proceeding with the electronic surveillance. This judgement of preserving the right of the individual is considered to be the major policy decision taken by the court.
In the legal context of electronic surveillance, police typically need a warrant to monitor phone calls and can only place surveillance devices with a warrant. Private citizens generally cannot lawfully monitor others' calls, and recording their own calls varies by state law.
The aspects of electronic surveillance you've listed differ in their legality and are governed by different laws and guidelines. Here's a breakdown of each option:
#SPJ12