The biggest concern to the people of Rome if a strong foreign navy blocked the ports near Rome would have likely been the city of A. Rome running out of grain bought from across the sea. Additionally, C. the disruption of trade in exotic goods from Carthage and Spain and the possibility of soldiers in Roman colonies deserting the army would have been significant concerns.
The biggest concern to the people of Rome if a strong foreign navy blocked the ports near Rome would have likely been the city of Rome running out of grain bought from across the sea. Proximity to a seaport was important to Roman trade because shipping by sea was less expensive than by land. The interruption of the grain supply in 190 CE had resulted in famine and riots in the city of Rome, highlighting the dependence on imported grain to feed the population. Another concern to the people of Rome would be the disruption of trade in exotic goods from Carthage and Spain.
These goods were cherished in the empire, and the sea and land routes that connected urban hubs were crucial to this exchange. The loss of access to these goods would have had a significant impact on commerce and potentially caused shortages in luxury items. Lastly, the soldiers in the Roman colonies in Spain and Gaul could desert the army if the ports near Rome were blocked by a strong foreign navy. These colonies were important sources of soldiers for the Roman army, and if they couldn't maintain communication and supply lines with Rome, there was a risk of soldiers abandoning their posts.
#SPJ2
Answer:
A is the correct answer
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
c. For whom, should we produce goods and services?
b. How should we produce goods and services?
d. Where are we going to produce the goods and services?
The option that is not a basic economic question that a society must address
d. Where are we going to produce the goods and services?
a. What goods and services should we produce?
b. How should we produce goods and services?
c. For whom should we produce goods and services?
These questions revolve around allocation of resources to meet the needs and wants of a society.
The question of 'where' to produce goods and services is typically not considered a fundamental economic question, as it's often more of a business decision influenced by factors like resources availability, labor costs, market accessibility, etc., rather than an overarching economic concern.
Learn more about economic question at
#SPJ6
The correct answer is option C: "The past tells us what to do in the future; what has worked for one population works the same for another which helps us keep things historically even."
It is important to know about the great educators of the past because their theories and ideas have influenced the field of early childhood education and have helped shape today's ideas and practices.
However, it is not accurate to say that what has worked for one population will work the same for another.
Each population is unique and has different needs, so it is important to adapt teaching strategies to meet the needs of each individual population.
Therefore, option C is not a valid reason for why it is important to know about the great educators of the past.
In conclusion, while it is important to learn from the past and use the ideas and practices of great educators to inform our current teaching strategies, it is also important to recognize the unique needs of each population and adapt our strategies accordingly.
For more similar questions on childhood education
#SPJ11
income tax rates were raised across the board.
the closing of the Reading Railroad.
bank dividends came to an end for borrowers.
The closing of the reading railroad caused many banks that were investing in it to go bankrupt and then on a long chain of things that went horribly wrong to cause the HUGE panic of 1893. Pls mark branliest even though this is 3yrs late LOL.
Answer:
Mecca
Mecca is the only pilgrimage site officially accepted by all Muslims, but Iran and Iraq are home to a number of sites considered holy to the Shia faithful: Hussein was buried at Karbala, for example, and the tomb of Ali is in nearby Najaf.
That is a very interesting question. The Mandan Indians were a Native American tribe that lived in the Great Plains region of North America. They had a complex and rich culture, based on farming, hunting, trading, and ceremonial activities. They were also known for their hospitality and friendship with other tribes and European explorers12
The Mandan Indians faced many challenges and risks throughout their history, such as wars, diseases, environmental changes, and cultural assimilation. Some of the reasons why they were willing to take these risks may include:
That is a very interesting question. The Mandan Indians were a Native American tribe that lived in the Great Plains region of North America. They had a complex and rich culture, based on farming, hunting, trading, and ceremonial activities. They were also known for their hospitality and friendship with other tribes and European explorers12
The Mandan Indians faced many challenges and risks throughout their history, such as wars, diseases, environmental changes, and cultural assimilation. Some of the reasons why they were willing to take these risks may include:
1: They had a strong sense of identity and pride in their traditions and beliefs. They valued their ancestral heritage and their connection to the land. They also had a cosmology that explained their origin, purpose, and destiny in the world123
2: They had a resilient and adaptable spirit. They learned to cope with changing circumstances and to adopt new technologies and practices that enhanced their survival and well-being. They also formed alliances and trade networks with other tribes and Europeans, which gave them access to resources and opportunities124
3: They had a vision of the future and a hope for a better life. They sought to improve their living conditions and to secure their rights and freedoms. They also participated in rituals and ceremonies that expressed their gratitude, faith, and aspirations.
These are some of the possible reasons why the Mandan Indians were willing to take the risks. However, there may be other factors that influenced their decisions and actions, such as individual personalities, motivations, emotions, values, and goals. The Mandan Indians were not a homogeneous group, but a diverse and dynamic community of people with different perspectives and experiences. Therefore, it is important to respect their complexity and diversity, and to avoid generalizing or stereotyping them.