In what ways was World War I truly a global conflict?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

it was a war

Explanation:

people died how is that not a global conflict


Related Questions

What was controversial about Roosevelt’s 1937 Quarantine Speech?A) Roosevelt hinted that the US could not always remain neutral and might have to “quarantine” other states to keep the peace. B) Roosevelt argued that the country should remain neutral when other nations ignored international treaties. C) The speech advocated for a “quarantine” of America if there was an attack from a foreign nation. D) The speech argued that isolationism was a moral response to a conflict that was not started by the United States.
How Did Henry the VIII killed his women
Which of the following is NOT one of the six kingdoms recognized today?A. Archaebacteria B. Carnivora C. Fungi D. Protista
In paragraph 1, Roosevelt is most likely referring to what?(1) Whereas the successful prosecution of the war requires every possible protection against espionage and against sabotage to national-defense material, national-defense premises, and national-defense utilities as defined in Section 4, Act of April 20, 1918, 40 Stat. 533, as amended by the Act of November 30, 1940, 54 Stat. 1220, and the Act of August 21, 1941, 55 Stat. 655 (U.S.C., Title 50, Sec. 104);
Why did most blacks not want to go to Africa during the colonization movement? a. The trip from America to Africa would be long and dangerous.b. Africans made it clear they would not be welcome in Africa.c. They believed that slavery would be abolished soon in the United States.d. They had been born in the United States and had little in common with Africans.

How was it possible for ancient Roman cities to develop farther inland, further away from rivers and coastlines?

Answers

It was possible for ancient Roman cities to develop farther inland, further away from rivers and coastlines due to an extensive "trade network", which linked the various regions. 

What was the significance of the 1876 election? a)The results marked the beginning of segregation. b)The results marked the end of Reconstruction. c)The results marked the end of segregation. d)The results marked the beginning of Reconstruction.

Answers

Answer:

b)The results marked the end of Reconstruction.

Explanation:

The presidential elections of 1876 were the most disputed and intense in the electoral history of the United States of America. Samuel J. Tilden of New York, defeated the Republican candidate, Rutherford B. Hayes, originally from Ohio, in the popular vote. Thus, Tilden would receive 184 electoral votes against 165 of Hayes, but 20 votes were not counted, and were in dispute, and came from the states of Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina. Each party declared its voters as winners, but in Ohio a Democratic elector was dismissed from his position for holding a public office. Finally, Hayes assumed the presidency on March 4, 1877.

(MC)Which of the following events damaged public support for the labor union movement during the late 19th century? the opening of Ellis Island the Pullman Strike the Triangle Shirtwaist fire the Haymarket Square riot

Answers

The Haymarket Square Riot.
This was because as the protesters were peacefully manifesting, an unknown person through a bomb at the police, killing seven policemen, four protestors and injuring scores of people. The general public then became skeptic of the labor union movement and became more supportive of the police.

The answer for this question is D                        


Which of the following resulted from the leadership of Mao Zedong

Answers

Under Mao Zedong or Mao Tse Tung’s leadership resulted the 5 year program known as Great Leap Forward. This program was made with the intention to provide an alternative model for economic growth in the Soviet model that focused more on heavy industry.

List and explain three major causes of the fall of the Soviet Union and communism in Eastern Europe, and then write a paragraph describing the results of the fall. Be specific, and use examples.

Answers

The main causes of the fall of the Soviet Union and communism in Eastern Europe are related to authoritarianism, the Cold War and pressure from the West.

What was the Cold War?

It was a geopoliticalconflict between the United States and the Soviet Union that divided the world into capitalist and socialist blocs. There were several technologicaldevelopments in the period, such as the search for hegemony in the space race.

Therefore, the US victory in the cold war made the country a world power with important allies, weakening the soviet union and communism.

Find out more about Cold War here:

brainly.com/question/25774915

#SPJ2

Constitution of the Soviet Union (1977) - its article 72 provides legal ground to freely secede from the federation.
Decentralization efforts by the local political elites - primarily including ones of the Russian SSR, namely, B. Yeltsin & co. A relevant fact is that over 75% people (80% turnout) voted for the preservation of the renewed federation in the Soviet Union referendum in 1991. However, the leaders of the Soviet Union republics have neglected that. This point includes nationalism (particularly in the Baltic and Middle Asian republics) as well.
Incompetence of the Soviet leaders in Moscow  - perhaps, M. Gorbachev was the weakest political leader of our country ever. This man, no matter of his true intentions, constantly surrendered our national interests. That's why, he is personally hated by the largest part of our society and heartily beloved in Europe at the same time.
Economic difficulties - fall in oil prices, economic shortage, sick imbalanced military accented nature of the economy etc. This is an inherently minor reason, because the Chinese transformation, made by Deng Xiaoping since the end of 70s, eloquently proved ability of the planned economy to be reformed.

In what case did the Supreme Court rule that confessions cannot be introduced as evidence unless they were offered after police advised the suspect of his or her legal rights?

Answers

Miranda vs State of Arizona was the case where the Supreme Court ruled that confessions cannot be introduced as evidence unless they were offered after police advice the suspect of his or her legal rights.