-150+(-45)= -195
Negative since it’s deeper
this might be yo answer im not sure
i hope this helped u tho
if we were to use the quadratic formula, we would get that the roots are
or that the 2 seperate roots are
and
if we sum these, then the bits will cancel and we wil be left with
or or
the sum of the solutions is
Try this option:
According to the properties of the quadratic equation the sum of its roots is '-b', in other words x₁+x₂= -b
Answer: -b
The original annual salary of Jessica is 42222
Let the original annual salary of Jessica be represented by x.
Percentage decrease in salary = 9%
Amount of the decrease = 3800
Therefore, based on the information given, the equation to solve the question will be:
9% × x = 3800
0.09 × x = 3800
0.09x = 3800
Divide both side by 0.09
0.09x/0.09 = 3800/0.09
x = 42222
Therefore, the original annual salary of Jessica is 42222.
Read related link on:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
x = original salary
$3800 = (1-9%)x = (1-0.09)x = 0.91x
x = $3800/0.91 = $4175.82
Answer:
2/3x + 1
Step-by-step explanation:
The y-intercept is 1. you can see that when x increases three, y increases 2.
Answer:
No, these data do not provide sufficient evidence at the 5% level to reject the hypothesis that these population proportions are equal.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that data taken from a random sample of 60 students chosen from the student population of a large urban high school indicated that 36 of them planned to pursue post-secondary education.
An independent random sample of 50 students taken at a neighboring large suburban high school resulted in data that indicated that 31 of those students planned to pursue post-secondary education.
Let = population proportion of students of a large urban high school who pursue post-secondary education.
= population proportion of students of a large suburban high school who pursue post-secondary education.
So, Null Hypothesis, : = 0 {means that these population proportions are equal}
Alternate Hypothesis, : 0 {means that these population proportions are not equal}
The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z proportionstatistics;
T.S. = ~ N(0,1)
where, = sample proportion of students of a large urban high school who pursue post-secondary education = = 0.60
= sample proportion of students of a large urban high school who pursue post-secondary education = = 0.62
= sample of students of a large urban high school = 60
= sample of students of a large suburban high school = 50
So, the test statistics =
= -0.214
The value of z test statistics is -0.214.
Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.
Since our test statistics lies within the range of critical values of z, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.
Therefore, we conclude that these population proportions are equal.
Answer:
Reese read 26 pages on Sunday.
Step-by-step explanation:
If she read twice the amount on Saturday than she read on Sunday, then you can replace the days with variables. 2x for Saturday and x for Sunday. That leaves you with 2x + x = 78. This can be simplified to 3x = 78. We can solve this by dividing both sides by 3. This leaves you with x = 26. If x represents the pages read on Sunday then Reese read 26 pages on Sunday.
Answer:
The probability is
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The amount of time is uniform probability distribution between 21 and 38 minutes.
Given that the amount of time is uniformly distributed then the probability that a randomly selected car will require less than 25 minutes to service is mathematically evaluated as
=>