Answer:
Explanation:
Roger Sherman and the Connecticut Compromise
Roger Sherman In Article VI of the Constitution of the United States, the framers declared, "This Constitution... to be the supreme Law of the Land." Constitutional authority, Laurence Tribe, notes in his book, American Constitutional Law, that "the Constitution is an endlessly intriguing object of study, and represents the best effort of its kind in the history of the world." Among the men who created the Constitution in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787, Roger Sherman, a Superior Court Judge, is remembered as the architect of the Connecticut Compromise.
When the Constitutional Convention became deadlocked over the matter of legislative voting, Sherman proposed a system similar to one he had advocated previously as a delegate to the Continental Congress in 1776. The compromise provided for representation in the House of Representatives according to population and in the Senate by equal numbers for each state. Sherman's compromise was adopted on July 16, 1787 by a vote of five states to four, and served not only to save the crumbling convention, but provided stimulus to resolve other issues yet to be decided.
Following ratification of the Constitution, Sherman served first in the House of Representatives and then in the Senate. He died while still a Senator in 1793, and is buried in the Grove Street Cemetery in New Haven, Connecticut.
Sherman was the only person to sign all four documents of the American Revolution: the Continental Association of 1774, the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States.
The absence of the Great Compromise proposed by Roger Sherman could have resulted in a deadlock at the Constitutional Convention, possibly leading to a weakened or fragmented union, and altering the structure of the U.S. government.
Had Roger Sherman not proposed the Great Compromise, the structure of the United States government could have been significantly different. Without this compromise, there may have been a stalemate between the larger and smaller states during the Constitutional Convention, as they were divided by the Virginia Plan favoring proportional representation and the New Jersey Plan advocating for equal representation regardless of state size. This deadlock could have jeopardized the formation of a unified national government, potentially leading to a continuation of the weak confederation established under the Articles of Confederation or even a fragmentation of the union. Ultimately, the Great Compromise allowed for a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives based on population and a Senate with equal representation for all states, creating balance and satisfying both large and small states.
Explanation:
One possible explanation that is often given is that they may have felt too small to sustain a settlement. Another possibility that is given is that they may have been driven during the time by American Indians.
Remember, it was the Italian explorer and navigator Christopher Columbus's fascination that he had found what he called a New World that later led to the settlement of the Europeans.
Similarities exist between the unjust treatment of Japanese Americans during World War II and the experiences of certain ethnic groups in America today, such as discrimination and stereotypes. However, the specifics and severity of these mistreatments may vary.
Indeed, there are similarities between how Japanese Americans were treated during World War II and how certain ethnic groups are treated today in America.
Japanese Americans
were treated with suspicion and prejudice strictly based on their ethnic background, culminating in their internment during the war under the Executive Order 9066. Today, instances of xenophobia or racism against certain ethnic or racial groups echo this past mistreatment, with discrimination often based on assumptions about the group's loyalty or intentions, much like the unfounded suspicions directed towards Japanese Americans. For instance, xenophobia frequently increases during political or global crises or conflicts, particularly if the group in question is in any way associated with the conflict.
Discrimination
may manifest in similar ways, from verbal and physical abuse to more systematic manifestations like racially biased law enforcement or discriminatory immigration practices. Furthermore, stereotypes continue to play a role in the
treatment of ethnic groups
, often leading to damaging misconceptions about these communities and individuals. It is important, however, to also note the differences in the specifics and severity of these mistreatments.
#SPJ2
B. Preachers settled towns as people moved west.
C. They practiced quietly at home.
D. Itinerant preachers spread their religions.
Answer:
ancient china and ancient india both considered religion to be very important the main religions of china were confucianism thousand and legalism the centeral
Explanation:
An increasing number of people lived in cities
An increasing number of people worked on family farms
An increasing number of people left the family farms
Answer:
An increasing number of people worked on family farms
Explanation:
Many people left their family farms during the industrial revolution. Because of this, there would be a decreasing number of people working on the family farms, not an increasing number.
Answer:
The dollar was no longer convertible into gold.
Explanation:
President Nixon ordered Executive Order 11615, which brought stability in the economy of the country by Stabilization of Wages, Prices, Rents, and Salaries. It also reduces inflation, minimize unemployment and protect the purchasing power of the dollar.