Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the question we are given an equation that represents the given situation as d = 40t where;
d is the distance in km
t is the time in seconds.
The given function is a direct proportionality. For example if p is directly proportional to q, this is expressed as p ∝ q where ∝ is the proportionality sign. In order to remove the sign we will introduce a constant say "k". The equation will become;
p = kq (p and q are the variables)
A direct proportionality means that as a variable is increasing, the other is increasing and vice versa. Comparing p = kq with d = 40t, we can see that k is equal to 40 and d is directly proportional to t
Hence the constants of proportionality for the relationship between distance in kilometers and number of hours is 40 on comparing.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the rate is 1 1/3 math papers per every 8 seconds so you could put it as a fraction: (1 1/3 )/8. you would then divide to get 1/6 math papers per second as your answer
Answer:
- After 2 weeks, Tarik will have $116 saved.
- After 3 weeks, Tarik will have $154 saved.
- After 4 weeks, Tarik will have $192 saved.
- Tarik will have enough money to buy the tablet after 6 weeks.
- The inequality representing the problem is $40 + ($38 * number of weeks) >= $265.49.
Step-by-step explanation:
To represent the amount of money saved after a certain number of weeks, we can use the expression:
Amount of money saved = $40 + ($38 * number of weeks)
Let's evaluate this expression for 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks:
For 2 weeks:
Amount of money saved = $40 + ($38 * 2)
Amount of money saved = $40 + $76
Amount of money saved = $116
For 3 weeks:
Amount of money saved = $40 + ($38 * 3)
Amount of money saved = $40 + $114
Amount of money saved = $154
For 4 weeks:
Amount of money saved = $40 + ($38 * 4)
Amount of money saved = $40 + $152
Amount of money saved = $192
To determine when Tarik will have enough money to buy the tablet, we need to set up an inequality. Let's represent the cost of the tablet as C:
Amount of money saved >= Cost of the tablet (C)
In this case, the cost of the tablet is $265.49. Therefore, the inequality becomes:
$40 + ($38 * number of weeks) >= $265.49
To solve this inequality, we can subtract $40 from both sides:
$38 * number of weeks >= $265.49 - $40
$38 * number of weeks >= $225.49
Finally, we divide both sides of the inequality by $38 to solve for the number of weeks:
number of weeks >= $225.49 / $38
number of weeks >= 5.93 (approximately)
Since the number of weeks must be a whole number, Tarik will have enough money to buy the tablet after 6 weeks.
To summarize:
- After 2 weeks, Tarik will have $116 saved.
- After 3 weeks, Tarik will have $154 saved.
- After 4 weeks, Tarik will have $192 saved.
- Tarik will have enough money to buy the tablet after 6 weeks.
- The inequality representing the problem is $40 + ($38 * number of weeks) >= $265.49.
The mileage is within a z-score of 1.5 is (b) 24 miles
From the complete question, we have the following parameters:
Standard deviation = 3.6
Mean = 18.6
z = 1.5
The z-score is calculated using:
So, we have:
Cross multiply
Make x the subject
Substitute known values
Evaluate
x = 24
Hence, the mileage is within a z-score of 1.5 is (b) 24 miles
Read more about z-scores at:
#SPJ5
1/6,1/9,2/27,4/81,...