The action that takes place in both the presidential, as well as, parliamentary governments would be:
A). Voters elect members of the legislative branch.
Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about 'government' here:
Answer:
Most of the time they do, so yeah. . . . . .
Thanks for the free points.
Have a great day and stay safe! :)
Answer:
Haha, only if we knows the answer for your question then it will be answered at anytime.
Hammurabi, which was carved in large stones in the tenth century B.C.
Answer:
I'm sorry, but there is an error in the statement. The Code of Hammurabi was actually created in the 18th century BCE, not the 10th century BCE. It is one of the oldest known legal codes, and it was created during the reign of King Hammurabi of Babylon. The Code of Hammurabi was written on a large stone stele, which was inscribed with 282 laws that governed various aspects of Babylonian society, including commerce, property rights, and criminal justice.
Explanation:
Or
False
Conflict of interest
Wrongful conviction
Mitigating circumstance
Answer:
it focused on the limits of power and not on crime and punishments
Explanation:
Answer:
Most of the structure of the organization was a combination of Greek and Roman influences, most of the Bill of Rights taken from the common law of England / Magna Carta, but the truly unique thing was that it did not allow religious trials to hold office, and prevent religious establishment.
Significantly, this did not apply to the provinces at first, only to the provincial government. Many provinces immediately declared their official state religion. This went under the inclusion doctrine found in amendment 14.
Hope it helps!
B. Police may place surveillance devices on suspected criminals’ phones
C. Police can plant viruses on smartphones of suspected drug runners.
D. Private citizens can monitor other people’s telephone calls.
E. Private citizens can record their own telephone calls in most states.
Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls.
Option A
Explanation:
The Supreme Court of America has made and landmark judgements in electronic surveillance like tapping phone calls and accessing the phone records.
It stated that without a proper warrant if the police department carry out electronic surveillance means it amounts to be illegal, it is a breach of privacy of individuals.
So, the top court has issued guidelines before proceeding with the electronic surveillance. This judgement of preserving the right of the individual is considered to be the major policy decision taken by the court.
In the legal context of electronic surveillance, police typically need a warrant to monitor phone calls and can only place surveillance devices with a warrant. Private citizens generally cannot lawfully monitor others' calls, and recording their own calls varies by state law.
The aspects of electronic surveillance you've listed differ in their legality and are governed by different laws and guidelines. Here's a breakdown of each option:
#SPJ12