Answer:
nearest integer 27 by 4
a. Complete the congruence statement: △MNK ≅ △_______
b. What side is congruent to ≅ ______
c. Solve for x. _____
The given statements to be completed are completed as follows;
A) △MNK ≅ △RTP
B) TR ≅ NM
C) x = 7
We are given that;
△NMK ≅ △TRP
This means that Triangle NMK is congruent to Triangle TRP.
A) The naming of △NMK is now △MNK. Thus, we have to now re-name Triangle TRP to match the naming of △MNK. Thus;
△MNK ≅ △RTP
B) From the 2 given triangles, we can see that TR and NM are the same length and also perpendicular lines.
Thus they are congruent to each other and as such;
TR ≅ NM
C) Since TR and NM are congruent to each other. Then;
TR = NM
Thus;
3x - 1 = 20
3x = 20 + 1
3x = 21
x = 21/3
x = 7
Read more at; brainly.com/question/13547762
Answer:
A-△MNK ≅ △RTP
B- TR≅NM
C- X=7
Step-by-step explanation:
I did the assignment loves.
The amount of chlorine needed to treat a swimming pool is directly proportional to the volume of the poolWhat is the constant of proportionality for this relationship
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The point slope form of the equation of a line is given as:
The slope-intercept form of the equation of a line is given as:
where: m=slope, b=y-intercept.
To convert from the point slope form to slope intercept form, follow these steps:
Step 1: Distribute the right hand side
Step 2: Isolate the y variable
This is the slope-intercept form. We can evaluate
x - 3y = 3
Does this system have a solution?
Answer:
No solution
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope-Intercept Form: y = mx + b
Step 1: Write out systems of equations
-x + 3y = 3
x - 3y = 3
Step 2: Rewrite equations into slope-intercept form
3y = 3 + x
y = 1 + x/3
-3y = 3 - x
y = -1 + x/3
Step 3: Rewrite systems of equations
y = x/3 + 1
y = x/3 - 1
Since we have the same slope for both equations but different y-intercepts, we know that both lines are parallel. If that is the case, they will never touch or intersect each other. Therefore, we have no solution.
Answer:
The p value for this case would be:
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is not different from 0.39
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=100 represent the random sample taken
X=36 represent the number of people that take E supplement
estimated proportion of people who take R supplement
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true proportion is equatl to 0.39 or not, the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info we got:
The p value for this case would be:
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is not different from 0.39
2. 6, 8, 10,
5, 7, 9, 11,
ОО
4. 3. 16. 32