Why were colonists upset by the Proclamation of 1763?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was very unpopular with the colonists. ... This angered the colonists. They felt the Proclamation was a plot to keep them under the strict control of England and that the British only wanted them east of the mountains so they could keep an eye on them.


Related Questions

Which of the following benefited British exports to America? the absence of a uniform tariff rate the superior quality of British goods the economic recession in America the British alliance with some Native American tribes
Who was a better activist , WEB Dubois or Booker T. Washington
true or false did Mantegna use the technique of trompe l'oeil when he painted a small room to make it look like one was outside
What was the goldmine of new england
What was the constitutional issue in the court case schenck vs united states?

Why were the roads such a vital part of the Empire? Explain.

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

As the legions blazed a trail through Europe, the Romans built new highways to link captured cities with Rome and establish them as colonies. These routes ensured that the Roman military could out-pace and out-maneuver its enemies, but they also aided in the everyday maintenance of the Empire.

Which was not a contributing factor to the fall of the Roman Empire?

Answers

The Roman Empire fell for many reasons. The Roman Empire did not fall because of it's agricultural practices. The Roman Empires capacity to provide food for it's people was a true marvel of both engineering and logistics that utilized an amazing series of aquaducts, roads, and crop rotation to provide for the needs of the Empire.

The British used a practice called _____ in which they managed African colonies through local African leaders. Select the best answer from the choices provided.

indirect rule
direct rule
traditional rule
colonialism

Answers

The correct answer is the first one: the indirect rule. Indirect rule was a system of British and French colonial powers, which employed the local structures and rulers, which enabled stability, while ensuring the power remained in the hands of the Colonial power. 

What makes a one party system so dangerous to implement?

Answers

Answer:

The one-party system refers to the political frameworks where one party forms and runs the government. It can happen in two ways. Either the activities of the opposition can be outlawed or the possibility for the opposition to come into power is suppressed. In some cases, the dominant parties allow the less dominant ones to exist, so that the party can hide authoritarianism. Some scholars argue that even in multiparty system party can act as authoritarian, so the legal framework, social and economic and political factors become important in such matters. The one-party system is dangerous as one party nominates all the candidates and there is no place for opposition.

A single-party system is one in which one party nominates all candidates for office. Thus there is no competition for offices etc

According to the Richter scale, a reading of 2.0 would cause damage, as opposed to a reading of 7.0, which would cause damage.

Answers

The Richter scale (developed in 1935 by Charles F.Richter) was themost known and standardized earthquake measurement. It is usedto rate the magnitude of an earthquake measuring the amount of energy itreleased through the calculation of information from a seismograph. The rangeof 2.0 to 7.0 would cause damaged. Reading below 2.0 are called microquakes.

Answer:

no

serious

Explanation:

What was one of the direct result of the Cuban missile crisis

Answers

So, the Cuban Missile Crisis was when Soviet ships were sending nuclear missiles to its ally Cuba. The United States, while flying U-2s over the area, found out that this was happening and President Kennedy ordered a blockade to stop the incoming ships from delivering their weapons. Now, this was such a big deal because Cuba is 90 miles off the coast of Florida and the long-range missiles could reach almost every major city in the U.S. This was the closest the world ever came to having a nuclear war and as a result of that President Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev established a hot line that if a crisis ever did arise again the two could talk it out.