Himmler argued that SS officers and soldiers “remained decent” while overseeing the extermination of the Jews; why then does he focus so much attention on punishing those who took money from the dead Jews?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Heinrich Himmler (1900-1945) was the Reich (Reichsführer) Leader of the fearsome SS Party of the Nazi Party from 1929 until 1945.

What did Himmler do?

Himmler murdered masses of people who were motivated only by racism and was dubbed racial cleansing in the twentieth century.

There are possible opinions on the statement given:

  • Himmler tries to find that actions taken are not as trivial as material gain.
  • Himmler expresses his view of the German people as morally superior to the Jewish people.
  • he may be posting a message to keep her men in line to avoid theft from the government.

Thus, Himmler was the key and chief Nazi official responsible for conceiving and overseeing the implementation of the "Final Solution," the Nazi plan to exterminate European Jews.

To learn more about Heinrich Himmler, refer:

brainly.com/question/1160139

Answer 2
Answer:

Possible Answers:

Himmler is attempting to establish that the actions being taken aren’t for low reasons such as material gain.

Himmler is pointing out how he considers the German people to be morally superior to Jewish people.

He could be putting out the message to keep his own men in line to avoid theft from the state.


Related Questions

Imagine you are a settler in William Penn’s new colony, Pennsylvania.Write a letter of at least one full paragraph that describes your life to your friends back in England.
What were some of the innovative ways Americans fought disease during the revolution? What were the risks and potential rewards for these methods?
List some of the ways in which religion affected daily life in puritan new england
Prior to the Civil War, more people lived in the cities of what region than in any other region?
How did the Ottoman capture of Constantinople motive the Age of Exploration?

Empires stifled the creativity and economic production of the people who lived on their fringes, since those people had to spend all their time resisting conquest instead of developing new ideas.

Answers

Explanation:

The word innovate has always generated, in human history, uncertainty, skepticism and even rejection by those who want to preserve the established order. After all, "innovating" consists of "altering something, introducing new features", so the innovator is a revolutionary who introduces changes that alter order and, therefore, introduces some initial disorder that, over time, will become a new order prevailing to be later altered and transformed again as a result of the introduction of a new innovation. Some examples help clarify this point.

The Ottoman Turkish Empire under Sultan Bayezid II closed to the possibility of experiencing the benefits of the introduction of the printing press. The Sultan, by means of an edict, prohibited printing in Arabic. Only in 1727 would the introduction of the first printing press be allowed in the lands of the empire, but under strict control, as evidenced by Ibrahim Müteferrika, whose production was controlled by religious scholars.

Müteferrika himself was aware that Europeans were advancing by leaps and bounds and the Ottoman Empire was left behind and that was due to the European political system that guaranteed rights and freedoms, and to rationalism and the scientific revolution. Instead, the progress (education and literacy) of the Turkish empire had been mortgaged due to religious fundamentalism and Islamic law. The secularization of society was a necessary step for the scientific revolution. However, we must also keep in mind that the printing press (and in our days twitter and internet) are innovations that totalitarian and dictatorial regimes such as North Korea and Cuba do not like, since they propagate ideas that can be considered as “ subversive ”and that threaten the integrity of the oppressive State along with its civil and military elite. It is easier and safer that knowledge is not dispersed but centralized in a single institution so that homogeneous and uncritical consciences can be formed. It is not surprising that totalitarian and authoritarian regimes immediately intervene in education as a way of earning the uncritical loyalty of the population.

Which empire lasted only one hundred years, and which lasted almost three hundred years

Answers

The Mongol Empire lasted only 100 years. The Mali Empire lasted a little more than 300 years.

Explain the "Oklahoma Standard,"?

Answers

Answer:the patriotism and generosity of Oklahoma after the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was attacked

Explanation:

After the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was hurt in April 19, 1995 the state gained a standard of generosity and kindness

What was the name of the island on the East Coast, where thousands of immigrants were processed before coming into the country?-Angel Island

-New Jersey Island

- Ellis Island

-Brooklyn Island

Answers

Angel Island was the name of the island on the East Coast, where thousands of immigrants were processed before coming into the country. 

Ellis Island is on the East Coast.  Angle Island is on the West Coast.  Immigrants entering New York passed through Ellis island and those entering San Francisco passed through Angel Island

By late 1942 the united states effectively countered german advantages in the atlantic with what strategic response aerial bombardment

Answers

false
 the answer is not aerial bombardment
 The correct answer is convoys and escorts. The USA arranged to have its merchant ships, transporting military wares and foods to the allies to be escorted by convoys across the Atlantic.

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TIME REMAINING 02:31:49 In Santa Fe District v. Doe, the court ruled that student led prayer at a school football game failed the lemon test because it was “too entangled.” What does this mean?

Answers

Lemon test, named after another case, means that there cannot be too close connection between official structures and religion.

Yet, in this case, the prayer was using school structure such as the microphone.
So, the court ruled this because the court believed that the students might have felt pressured to pray and therefore would not have a free choice to pray or not