Is human self-interest the driving force behind all environmental problems?Claim:

Evidence:

Reasoning:

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Claim: Yes, it is true that human self-interest is the driving force behind all environmental problems.

Evidence:  The Increasing rate of global warming is the best evidence for the claim.

Reasoning: This is so because of human self-interest such as buying a car, burning of fossil fuels in industries, use of plastic, cutting trees, and hunting or poaching result into all environmental problems such as air pollution, deforestation, and endangered wildlife which leads to global warming.


Related Questions

Why is Dna replication is more complex in eukaryotes than in bacteria
Which is a biotic factor that affects the size of a population in a specific ecosystem?a. average temperature of the ecosystem b. type of soil in the ecosystem c. number and kinds of predators in the ecosystem d. concentration of oxygen in the ecosystem
Examine the cell structure above. The arrows are pointing to theand the cells inA) cleavage furrow, prophaseB) Cleavage furrow, telophaseC) equator, prophaseD) equator, telophase
Brad is testing three solutions with litmus paper after dipping strips in the solutions he observes two papers turning blue and one turning red out of the three solutions how many are acidic
Which part of the kidney acts as a funnel to pass the urine that is produced in several nephrons to the ureters? a. Medulla b. Cortex c. Renal pelvis

Anthony is studying how quickly children tire based on the amount of sugar they ingest. He splits a group of 20 children into 2 groups. One group is given sugar and the other is not. Anthony asks the children to start playing at a playground at the same time, and to stop when they tire, measuring the time each child stops playing. He finds that the children who did not ingest sugar played 2 minutes longer than those who did ingest sugar. Anthony rerandomizes the data, calculates the difference between the means, and creates the dot plot shown below. Based on the data, can Anthony conclude the difference is significant?A: Yes Anthony can conclude the difference is significant because a 2-minute difference is not likely to happen by chance
B: No, Anthony cannot conclude the difference is significant because a 2-minute difference is likely to happen by chance.
C: Yes, Anthony can conclude the difference is significant because 0.25 is the difference in means that occurs most often.
D: No, Anthony cannot conclude the difference is significant because 0.25 is the difference in means that occurs most often.

Answers

I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. Based on the data, Anthony can the difference is significant  because 0.25 is the difference in means that occurs most often. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.

Answer:

Option C,  Anthony can conclude the difference is significant because 0.25 is the difference in means that occurs most often.

Explanation:

Level of significance measures the unlikeliness in a hypothesis's against the measured reading.

0.05 is a common level of significance which depicts that there are 5% chances of a  type I error thereby rejecting a true null hypothesis in a one way test.

In two way test it depicts that there are 2.5% chances of a  type I error thereby rejecting a true null hypothesis

It is the probability of rejecting a nulll hypothesis with a probability of test suffering  an error of  type I type

Hence, option C is correct

cat fur color is determined by codominance the allele for tan fur (TT) and the allele for black fur (BB) are codo

Answers

what does that even mean

Which of the following is NOT an example of chemical weathering?a. natural plant acid breaking down a rock
c. oxidation of metals
b. acid rain deteriorating a marble statue
d. ice wedging in rock

Answers

The correct answer is "a. natural plant acid breaking down a rock" because physical weathering breaks down rocks and chemical tears down rocks.

Answer:

The answer is D. ice wedging in rock

Explanation:

According to the theory of _____________, mitochondria in cells today are the descendents of aerobic prokaryotes that used oxygen to generate energy.A) endosymbiosis
B) ingestion
C) mutualism
D) parasitism

Answers

Answer: A. endosymbiosis

The theory of endosymbiosis states that mitochondria in cells are once the descendants of aerobic prokaryotes. These prokaryotes used oxygen in order to generate energy. The mitochondria and the chloroplast are among the most important organelles that support endosymbiosis.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Which statement best relates science and societal problems? Societal problems are the result of science. Any societal problem can be solved by using science. A scientific solution to a societal problem does not result in further problems. Science can be used to address societal problems, but it is not always successful.

Answers

The true statement is the following one!
Science can be used to address societal problems, but it is not always successful.

For example, let's take alcoholism. Science can help us better understand the causes and help prevent and treat it, but it's not always successful as people often fall back into the illness despite their treatment.

Bacteria are important in sewage disposal becuase they ___

Answers

Here is my answer below : 

The bacteria is very important because when bacteria is on a substance it begins to eat the product of deposition , so my answer again is is is important because it eats the sewage disposal.   

I hope this helps
bc it eats the waste that is inside of the sewer pipes