Initially, African slaves and indentured servants from Europe worked in similar conditions in the North American colonies. However, from the late 17th century, a stark division emerged with the institution of lifelong hereditary slavery that treated Africans as property and limited their rights and freedoms significantly compared to their servant counterparts.
In the early days of North American colonies, both African slaves and indentured servants from Europe were used for labor. They worked side by side in the tobacco fields, and their conditions of servitude bore similarities, for instance, their servitude was typically time-bound and they could earn their freedom.
However, their statuses diverged significantly in the late 17th century with the institutionalization of lifelong, hereditary slavery targeting Africans. A stark division emerged between slaves and servants, particularly with regard to chattel slavery where slaves were treated as property that could be bought, sold, and owned permanently, rather than workers serving a term of years. Laws were also enacted that forbade Africans from bearing arms and learning to read and write. These laws differentiated the African slaves from their servant counterparts and marked the beginnings of systemic racial discrimination in the colonies.
Learn more about African Slavery in British Colonies here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
Directly or indirectly, the economies of all 13 British colonies in North America depended on slavery. By the 1620s, the labor-intensive cultivation of tobacco for European markets was established in Virginia, with white indentured servants performing most of the heavy labor. Before 1660 only a fraction of Virginia planters held slaves. By 1675 slavery was well established, and by 1700 slaves had almost entirely replaced indentured servants. With plentiful land and slave labor available to grow a lucrative crop, southern planters prospered, and family-based tobacco plantations became the economic and social norm.
Explanation:
is more prepared for the test
has more time to get work done
gives up a chance to have fun
takes more time to finish homework
Effects of the opportunity cost on the left are:
Options A and D is correct as,
are the loss of opportunity faced by someone.
The potential gains that an individual, investor, or organisation misses out on when choosing one option over another are referred to as opportunity costs.
Other options are incorrect as:
So, the effects of the opportunity cost are missing out on spending time with friends, gives up a chance to have fun
For more information about opportunity cost refer to the link:
To increase taxes for more government spending
O to focus on unemployment through government programs
To decrease the federal budget
Answer:
To decrease the federal budget.
Explanation:
President Calvin Coolidge was the president of the United States from 1923 to 1929 who was one of the few presidents who left office with less financial debt than he first started with. His policy of "economy in government" led to the economic boom in the United States.
His most important work as the president was to make sure that the economy did not unnecessarily burden the people but at the same time, cause no serious damage to the whole economy of the country. He presented an economic plan whereby he reduced the taxes imposed on the common people and also reduce the budget of the federal government. He strongly believed that cutting or reducing both were vital for the sustenance of the country's economy without imposing a massive risk or destruction to the people. Rather, he believed that those who had more income should have the opportunity to "better business, more of the comforts of life, general economic improvement, a larger opportunity for education, and greater freedom for all the people".
Answer:
Arguments for abolition of plea bargaining raise issues of rights, fairness, and just punishment. Plea bargaining is unfair because defendants forfeit some of their rights, including the right to trial by jury. ... Plea bargaining raises the possibility that innocent people will plead guilty to crimes they didn't commit.
Answer:
Arguments for abolition of plea bargaining raise issues of rights, fairness, and just punishment. Plea bargaining is unfair because defendants forfeit some of their rights, including the right to trial by jury. ... Plea bargaining raises the possibility that innocent people will plead guilty to crimes they didn't commit.
Explanation:
A, is 1 of the answers
hope this helps
Answer: C. non-Christians were an immediate threat to the stability of the church.
Explanation:
By the time Pope Urban called for the first Crusade in 1095, the Muslim armies had occupied a lot of territory both in Europe and in the Holy Land including Jerusalem.
Pope Urban felt it was the Church's duty to protect the land and people of Christendom from non-Christians whom he viewed as threats to the stability of the church. The other crusades as well were also called as Popes believed that they were necessary to protect Christian stability.
The statement above is an opinion because B. It is subjective.
An opinion is considered to be subjective because:
Saying that Mount Vesuvius erupting was one of the worst disasters in human history is a subjective because others might argue that there are many more events that eclipse it, some of which we may never know.
Because the statement is subjective, we can conclude that it is an opinion.
Find out more at brainly.com/question/18693258.
Answer:
It's B
Explanation: