As of 2013, which of these countries had the highest GDP per capita? Uganda the United States Switzerland Brazil

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

In the year 2013, the nation that had the highest GDP per capita out of the options was Switzerland.

What was the GDP per capita of Switzerland in 2013?

In 2013, Switzerland had the very high GDP per capita of $88,109.49 which put it higher than the United States and Brazil.

This high GDP per capita meant that the Swiss economy was strong and that the people were mostly well off.

Find out more on GDP per capita at brainly.com/question/1072073.

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

Switzerland the answer


Related Questions

A bottle of wine costs $8 and a quiche, $5. At Robert's present levels of consumption, he spends all his income and receives marginal utility of $10 from the last bottle of wine and marginal utility of $4 from the last quiche. To maximize his total utility, Robert should a. buy less wine and more quiche. b. buy more wine and less quiche. c. spend all of his money on wine. d. spend all of his money on quiche.
A $20,000 municipal bond is offered for sale at $18,000. The bond interest rate is 6 percent per year payable semiannually. The bond will mature and be redeemed at face value 5 years from now. If you purchase the bond, the first premium you will receive is 6 months from today. You have decided that you will invest $18,000 in the bond if your effective semi-annual yield is at least 4 percent. What effective semi-annual rate will this investment yield?
What if, instead of making jet fighter experience a requirement to become an astronaut, NASA instead offered higher salaries to astronauts with jet fighter experience than to those who did not have jet fighter experience
What is one course of action available in every decision making process?a. Respond in a way which will have only positive consequencesb. Respond in a way which will have no negative consequencesChoose to do nothing about the issued. None of the abovePlease select the best answer from the choices providedА
You call a coworker to see if they can come help you solve a problem​

At December 31, 2017, Sweet Corporation had a projected benefit obligation of $561,600, plan assets of $331,900, and prior service cost of $120,300 in accumulated other comprehensive income. Determine the pension asset/liability at December 31, 2017. (Enter liability using either a negative sign preceding the number e.g. -45 or parentheses e.g. (45).) Pension asset/liability at December 31, 2017

Answers

Answer:

Pension liability at December 31, 2017 is ($229,700)

Explanation:

Projected benefit obligation                         $561,600

Less: Plan assets                                           $331,900

Pension liability at December 31, 2017     -$229,700

SCENARIO:Marcus, feeling stressed out from work, decided to search for a meditation app for his phone that would help him relax during the day. One app, CalmDown, appeared to be promising. It didn't have any reviews yet and looked to be a brand-new app, so he decided to try it out. He downloaded the app to his phone and opened it up. The first screen required he enter in his name and email address. At the very bottom of the screen it had some small writing, but Marcus didn't notice it and hit the continue button.
Had Marcus clicked on the link at the bottom of the screen, he would have seen the following:
The second screen stated "Three-day trial version- Free! $59.99 annual fee thereafter." Marcus was annoyed that the app would cost him almost $60 but figured he would set a reminder on his phone to cancel the app before the trial period expired so he wouldn't get charged. Plus, he wanted to see the app in action. If it was actually worth the price, he wouldn't mind paying the annual fee. He clicked "Continue" and put in his bank card information on the next screen. The following screen asked Marcus a series of questions about his stress level and what he felt caused stress in his life. He clicked "high" and "work" as the level and cause. He then completed the first CalmDown meditation in the app, but was not impressed with its functionality. Deciding he would cancel his subscription immediately, he went into the profile settings to try to find the cancel option but couldn't. He searched every possible place on the app but didn't see a way to cancel the subscription. Marcus decided to try to find the app's developer through their website, but a quick search didn't turn up anything. Already stressed and becoming more frustrated, Marcus decided to contact the app store. They informed him that he should be able to go into his app store account and cancel the subscription there. However, when Marcus went there, he didn't see the app as an option or as a subscription. Thinking that maybe his subscription didn't process, he just deleted the app from his phone.
Marcus didn't give the app or the subscription any more thought, becoming increasingly more distracted by the amount of stress at work. Four months later, Marcus was looking at his bank account online and noticed it was lower than it should have been. He began reviewing the charges and noticed multiple charges for $59.99 to a merchant named "CDgotU." He immediately remembered the app and contacted his bank to dispute the charges. His bank replied that due to the charges being debit withdraws he needed to dispute them within 2 days of being made. Moreover, if he had been diligent about watching his account, they could have put a block on the account and the remaining fraudulent charges would have been prevented. The bank representative also told him that he should try to get a refund from the company that charged him. After making his case with the bank representative for several hours about how he tried to cancel his subscription, he was unsuccessful. The bank's representative was able to provide Marcus a phone number attached to the Merchant account, but when Marcus called the number it was disconnected. The bank could not provide him with any additional information such as a company address or website.
After more internet searching, Marcus saw a number of other complaints online about the app, and noticed it had been removed from the app store and was no longer available for download. Marcus decided to bring an action against the company for fraud, breach of contract, conversion, and several other claims in his home state of Vermont.

Can Marcus compel the bank or the app store to provide additional information about the creator of CalmDown in order to determine the creator's location and potential assets?
a. No, these records are not subject to being subpoenaed due to their confidential nature.
b. Yes, he can subpoena records during the discovery process from both, but the bank and the app store may ask the judge to deny the request or limit the request due to privacy concerns.
c. Yes, but he must subpoena these records prior to the filing of the complaint.
d. Yes, he can file interrogatories during the discovery process to both the bank and the app store.

Answers

Answer: b. Yes, he can subpoena records during the discovery process from both, but the bank and the app store may ask the judge to deny the request or limit the request due to privacy concerns.

Explanation:

Marcus can indeed compel the bank or the app store to provide additional information about the creator of the app should he wish to find out the creator's location and its potential assets so he can purse the case appropriately legal wise.

He can do this by subpoenaing the required information when laying the background for the suit. As this information is considered private and confidential however, both the bank and the store could appeal to the Judge to refuse Marcus's request on the grounds of privacy concerns.

Answer:

the anser is B

Explanation:

Wolverine Company financial statements included the effects of these errors: Reported Net Income for Year 1 was $20,000. Reported Net Income for Year 2 was $18,000. Indicate the error in 12/31/2 Retained Earnings:

Answers

Answer:

Net income year 2 = $21,300

Explanation:

I looked for the missing information and found this:

Year            Depreciation overstated         Prepaid expense omitted

1                              $2,500                                $2,000

2                             $4,000                                $2,700

If your question doesn't include the same values, just adjust the answer.

Year 2's net income = net income (year 2) + overstated depreciation (year 2) + omitted prepaid expenses (year 1) - omitted prepaid expenses (year 2) = $18,000 + $4,000 + $2,000 - $2,700 = $21,300

Back Bay Company is a price−taker and uses target pricing. Refer to the following​ information:Production volume602,000units per yearMarket price$34per unitDesired operating income17​%of total assetsTotal assets$13,800,000What is the target full product cost per​ unit? (Round your answer to nearest​ cent.) Assume all units produced are sold.

Answers

Answer: $30.10 per unit

Explanation:

Given that,

Production volume = 602,000 units per year

Market price = $34 per unit

Desired operating income = 17​% of total assets

Total assets = $13,800,000

Total income = 17% of Total assets

                      = 0.17 × $13,800,000

                      = $2,346,000

Total sales = Market price × Production volume

                  = $34 per unit × 602,000 units

                  = $20,468,000

Target full product cost in total for the year:

= Total sales - Total income

= $20,468,000 - $2,346,000

= $18,122,000

Target full product cost per​ unit = (Target\ full\ product\ cost)/(Production\ volume)

                                                      = (18,122,000)/(602,000)

                                                      = $30.10 per unit

Kim received a one-third profits and capital interest in Bright Line, LLC, in exchange for legal services she provided. In addition to her share of partnership profits or losses, she receives a $30,000 guaranteed payment each year for ongoing services she provides to the LLC. For X4, Bright Line reported the following revenues and expenses: sales-$150,000, cost of goods sold-$90,000, depreciation expense-$45,000, long-term capital gains -$15,000, qualified dividends-$6,000, and municipal bond interest-$3,000. How much ordinary business income (loss) will Bright Line allocate to Kim on her Schedule K-1 for X4? a. ($15,000).
b. $6,000.
c. $9,000.
d. $9,000.
e. $15,000.
f. None of the choices will be reported as ordinary business income (loss) on Schedule K-1.

Answers

Answer:

f. None of the choices will be reported as ordinary business income (loss) on Schedule K-1.

Explanation:

Note: Guaranteed payments have no effect on Kim's outside basis.

Bright Line LLC will be reporting on page 1 of Form 1065, an ordinary loss of $15,000 ($150000 - $90000 - $45000 - $30000)

1/3rd of $15,000 = $5,000. That is, $5,000 loss must be allocated to Kim on Schedule K-1. So, option f is the correct answer.

A portfolio conssts of 275 shares of Stock C that seilsfor $52 and 240 shares of Stock D that sells for $23. What is the portfolio weight of Stock c? a. 7816 b. 8117 c. 7215 d. 2387e. 2785

Answers

Answer:

c. 7215

Explanation:

Number of shares of Stock C = 275

Value of Stock C = $52

Number of shares of Stock D = 240

Value of Stock D = $23

The weight of stock of a given stock is defined by the total value of the stock divided by the total value of the portfolio. For stock C:

Value_C = 275*\$52=\$14,300\nValue_D = 240*\$23=\$5,520\nWS_C = (\$14,300)/(\$14,300+\$5,520) \nWS_C = 0.7215 = 72.15%

The weight of of Stock C is 0.7215 or 72.15%.

Other Questions