Answer:
Net profit or net income is overstated by $38000 and option B is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The adjusting entry to be made for accrued and unpaid wages would have been,
Wages expense 38000 Dr
Wages payable 38000 Cr
This entry would record an increase in expenses of $38000 and an increase in liabilities of $38000. As the entry is omitted, the expenses of $38000 are not recorded thus the expenses in income statement are understated. An understatement of expenses means an overstatement of profit by the same amount.
Thus, net profit or net income is overstated by $38000
b. The WTO seeks to reduce remaining trade barriers through multilateral negotiations.
c. The WTO is headquartered in Belgium.
d. Existence of the WTO has allowed most member countries to replace their local currencies with a universal currency beginning in 2002.
Answer:
a) & b) are true. c) & d) are false.
Explanation:
WTO is an international (intergovernmental) organisation, supervising international trade between countries.
a) is true. It seeks to establish impartial procedures for resolving trade disputes among its members.
It seeks to reduce remaining trade barriers through multilateral negotiations, b) is true
c) is false. It is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland (not Belgium)
d) is false. Existence of the WTO has allowed most member countries to replace their local currencies with a universal currency beginning in 2002. It is an international trade organisation, not monetary policy organisation.
B. Parent company retained earnings equals consolidated retained earnings.
C. Parent company total assets equals consolidated total assets.
D. Parent company dividends equals consolidated dividends.
E. Goodwill will not be recorded on the parent's books.
Answer: The correct answer is "C. Parent company total assets equals consolidated total assets".
Explanation: The statement "C. Parent company total assets equals consolidated total assets" is false before making adjustments on the consolidated worksheet when a parent uses the equity method because the parent company total assets are not equal to consolidated total assets.
Answer:
$20,790,000
Explanation:
Since the estimated total costs to complete had not change, the Construction is Process can be estimated as follows:
Construction in Process = Estimated total completion cost - Total costs of completion to date = $38,500,000 - $17,710,000 = $20,790,000
Answer:
The option c is a right answer.
Explanation:
For calculating the return on her portfolio, the steps is to be followed which is shown below:
Step 1: First compute the weight-age of each portfolio.
Step 2: Multiply the weight-age amount to invested return.
Step 3: After multiply the amounts, the expected return comes.
Mathematically,
Step 1: Weight-age is to be computed by
= Each Portfolio amount ÷ total stock amount
where total stock amount = $8,000 + $4,000 +$12,000
=$24,000
For A = $8,000 ÷ $24,000 = 0.3333
For B = $4000 ÷ $24,000 = 0.1666
For C = $12000 ÷ $24,000 = 0.50
Step 2:
Expected Return for A = Weight-age × invested return
= 0.3333 × 17.5%
= 5.83%
Expected Return for B = Weight-age × invested return
= 0.1666 × 11.0%
= 1.83%
Expected Return for C = Weight-age × invested return
= 0.50 × 4.30%
= 2.15%
So, the total return on her portfolio is a sum of Expected Return for A + Expected Return for B +Expected Return for C
= 5.83% + 1.83% + 2.15%
= 9.81 %
Hence, the return on her portfolio is 9.81% .
Therefore, the option c is a right answer
Answer:
4
Explanation:
The calculation of the process capability index is given below
Data provided in the question according to the question is as follows
USL = 27
LSL = 21
Now we take the average
X = (21 +27) ÷ 2
= 24
The standard deviation is 0.25
= min(USL - mean ÷ 3 × standard deviation , mean - LSL ÷ 3 × standard deviation)
After solving this the process capability index is 4
Answer:
Incremental cost of buying the component = $69,500
Therefore the component shall be make in the company and shall not be bought from outside.
Explanation:
Provided the cost in case of manufacturing
65,000 units
Variable Cost = $1.9565,000 = $126,750
Fixed Cost = $75,000
Total cost of making the product = $126,750 + $75,000 = $201,750
Total cost in case of buying the product
Price to be paid = $3.25 65,000 = $211,250
Also the fixed cost of $60,000 will be incurred in any manner and is not avoidable.
In that case total cost of buying the product = $211,250 + $60,000 = $271,250
Incremental cost of buying the component = $271,250 - $201,750 = $69,500
Therefore the component shall be make in the company and shall not be bought from outside.
If Gilberto Company purchases the part externally, it will incur an extra cost of $12,750. Therefore, it is more cost-effective for the company to continue manufacturing the part in-house.
The first step is to calculate the total cost of producing 65,000 units in-house and the total cost of buying 65,000 units externally.
For in-house production: The cost is the sum of variable costs, fixed costs, and allocated costs, yielding: (65,000 units * $1.95/unit) + $75,000 + $62,000 = $198,500
For external purchasing: the total cost is simply 65,000 units * $3.25/unit = $211,250.
We subtract the in-house cost from the external purchasing cost to obtain the incremental cost: $211,250 - $198,500 = $12,750. Therefore, it costs an incremental $12,750 to buy 65,000 units externally compared to making them in-house. Considering the cost-effectiveness, Gilberto Company should continue to manufacture the parts in-house rather than buying them from the external supplier.
#SPJ3