John Locke believed that man without government wasThe Foundations of Civil Liberties: Select the best answer from the cholces provided.
OA
unruly
OB.
without direction
OC. hopeless
OD. basically good

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The answer is D.

Locke Defended the claim that men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch. Lock says that people have rights, such as the rate of life, liberty, and property that I have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. He also said that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract or people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of the rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property.

Related Questions

who or what else, besides North Vietnamese was considered America's enemy? How did President Johnson try to sell this idea to the America public?​
Define eminent domain
Which of the following best describes John Wilkes Booth? a professional actor and fierce abolitionist a Republican politician who supported slavery a professional actor and fierce anti-abolitionist a Republican politician who opposed slavery
The main form of West African government wasA) democracy.B) bureaucracy.C) aristocracy.D) autocracy
The United States abolished slavery by passing the 13th amendment in ?

Each court of appeals is assigned a justice of the Supreme Court.
a. True
b. False

Answers

it is false not every court of appeal gets a justice from the supreme court 

How did the ideas of Hobbes and Locke differ?

Answers

There are several ways in which the  ideas of Hobbes and Locke differed, but in general Hobbes was more focused on the human condition, while Locke focused on the social contract. 

Answer:

  • Hobbes believed human beings were inherently at odds with each other and therefore needed an authoritarian government to rule over them.
  • Locke believed that human beings are morally neutral by nature, and can live side by side without a government -- but that creating a government makes society better.

Explanation:

Both English philosophers, Hobbes and Locke, believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in Leviathan in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and harmful toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his Two Treatises on Civil Government in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching about Hobbes and Locke, I've often described the difference between them in this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

Why did the Anti-Imperialist League oppose interventionism? A. Its leaders believed that the Spanish had a more successful empire.
B. Its leaders believed that America should build a better empire.
C. Its leaders believed that America should not take over other countries.
D. Its leaders believed that America should not do business abroad.

Answers

The Anti-Imperialist League oppose interventionism because C. Its leaders believed that America should not take over other countries.

Why interventionism  was opposed

The Anti-Imperialist League was formed in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and was against American expansionism and imperialism.

Its leaders believed that the United States should not intervene in the affairs of other countries or engage in the colonization or annexation of foreign territories.

Read mrow on interventionism  here brainly.com/question/8880956

#SPJ6

Answer:

For moral and practical reasons.

Explanation:

Apex Hope this helps

What is the primary reason to issue stock?

Answers

The primary reason a company issues stock is to raise funds to expand the business. That may mean building more factories or stores, or developing new products, etc. 

Issuing stock takes a company from being a private company to a public company, which has more regulations it must follow and reporting obligations to its stockholders. 

An example of a company moving from private to public with an initial public offering of stock would be The Home Depot stores. The company was founded in 1978, and had just three stores in Georgia in 1981 when it went public and issued stock. Today, The Home Depot has over 2,200 stores in three countries. So going public was a big step forward for the company.

The primary reason for a company to issue stock is to raise capital or funding for its operations and growth.

What is stock?

A firm effectively sells ownership shares or equity in the company to investors when it issues stock. These investors sometimes referred to as shareholders or stockholders, acquire a piece of the company's ownership based on the number of shares they buy.

It's crucial to remember that issuing shares entails a number of obligations and factors. Companies that are publicly traded are subject to regulatory monitoring, have duties to their shareholders and file required reports.

Learn more about stock here:brainly.com/question/26128641

#SPJ6

Which item is considered an example of medium? I will give brainliest if you are correct.

Answers

Answer:

A stage play

Explanation:

I know this isn't one of your choices but for anyone who has this as a choice, this is the correct answer

An example of a medium is a newspaper from the combined media form of newspapers, television, magazines, radio and the Internet.

in its early history, the netherlands relied on these two corporations for moeny and in some ways protection

Answers

The correct answer is:

The Dutch East India Company and the Dutch West India Company.

The Dutch West India Company was a chartered business of Dutch traders as well as international investors. It was granted a charter for a trade monopoly in the Dutch West Indies by the Republic of the Seven United Netherlands and granted jurisdiction over Dutch participation in the Atlantic slave trade, Brazil, the Caribbean, and North America.

The Dutch East India Company was a corporation established by a government-directed combination of various competing Dutch trading companies.

The Dutch East India Company and The Dutch West India Company