Cost-benefit analysis has been defined as the approach used to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the choices. The ecological damages must be subtracted from selling profits. Thus, option C is correct.
Cost-benefit analysis has been defined as the estimation of the cost and the profits in economical terms. It allows the determination of the monetary benefit gained by the manufacturing, production, and selling of the products.
To manufacture the bicycle frame the monetary benefit can be estimated by subtracting ecological damages for material mining from the profits earned by selling the frame of the bicycle. It gives the idea of how much it cost and benefits the maker.
Therefore, option C. (profits - ecological damage) gives a cost-benefit analysis.
Learn more about cost-benefit analysis, here:
#SPJ2
C. The egological damage of mining the materials would be subtracted from the profits made by selling the bicycle frames
B. was created by a reliable source
C. pretends to be scientific, but actually is not
D. was gathered during a scientific experiment
b. False
Reviewing the literature is not a specific step in the scientific method but an ongoing process integral to research, helping shape hypotheses and guide experiments. So the statement is false.
The statement that the third step in the scientific method is reviewing the literature is generally "False."
The scientific method is a systematic approach to conducting scientific research and typically involves steps like observation, hypothesis formation, experimentation, data analysis, and conclusion.
While reviewing the existing literature is a crucial component of scientific research, it is not typically considered a distinct step within the method. Instead, it is an ongoing and integral part of the research process that can occur at various stages.
Scientists often begin their research by reviewing relevant literature to understand what is already known about the topic, identify gaps in knowledge, and formulate research questions or hypotheses. This literature review helps guide the research design and methodology.
Therefore, while reviewing the literature is essential, it doesn't fit neatly into a specific step of the scientific method but rather supports and informs the entire research process.
For more questions on scientific method visit:
#SPJ6
The claim that the third step of the scientific method is reviewing literature is false. The third step is forming a hypothesis, and reviewing literature often occurs before this to understand prior knowledge on the subject.
The statement that the third step in the scientific method is reviewing the literature is False. The five main steps of the scientific method include: 1. Making Observations, 2. Forming a Question, 3. Forming a Hypothesis, 4. Conducting an Experiment and, 5. Analysing and Drawing Conclusions from the data. Reviewing the literature generally tends to occur before forming a hypothesis, in an aim to understand all current knowledge and previous research concerning a phenomenon or topic. It does not come after forming the hypothesis as the third step in the scientific method.
#SPJ6
Answer: Coastline
Explanation: edge 2020
Ovary, uterus
Uterus, fallopian tube
Uterus, ovary
B? or D? Or something else?
Answer: Ovary, uterus
Explanation:
The ovary is a female reproductive structure. It is responsible for development and secretion of egg (ovum) at the time of fertilization. It is responsible for secretion of hormones which are important for menstrual cycle and fertility.
The egg from the ovary is released into the fallopian tube. The egg from the fallopian tube is fertilized in the uterus by one of the sperm cell.