Answer:
A hypothesis must be testable for it to be useful in scientific research.
Explanation:
In a scientific research, the researcher needs to stipulate a hypothesis to be tested. Then he or she will do the work based on this assumption, which can be confirmed or rejected at the end of the job. This confirmation or rejection of the hypothesis will be obtained through the result of the analysis, either through data, literature review or experiment.
For example, an economist will do research on the impact of rising incomes on decreasing mortality. He may have a hypothesis that increased income has a positive effect on life expectancy. Then he will do the data analysis and in the end he will know if his hypothesis has been accepted or rejected.
I would say the 2nd answer.
A hypothesis must be testable for it to be useful in scientific research.
B. The author’s writing cannot be clearly understood.
C. The author deliberately chooses a confusing title.
D. Multiple books on the same theme are written by two different authors.
The ambiguity technique in literature is Sections of work can be interpreted in more than one way. Therefore option A is the correct response.
Ambiguity is the ability of a word, phrase, statement, or concept to be understood in more than one manner. When a sentence or statement contains unclear punctuation or syntactic structure, it is said to have syntactic ambiguity (the ordering of parts of the sentence).
Syntactic ambiguity, also known as structural ambiguity or grammatical ambiguity, in English grammar refers to the occurrence of two or more meanings that could apply to a single sentence or group of words, as opposed to lexical ambiguity, which refers to the occurrence of two or more meanings that could apply to a singleword.
When the author's intent isn't obvious, the writing is vague. But when anything is written that is straightforward but has several interpretations, it is said to be ambiguous.
To read more about ambiguity technique, refer to - brainly.com/question/1321908
#SPJ6
Which sentence correctly follows the rule?
Question 3 options:
Did the Twentieth Century span the years 1900 to 1999 or the years 1901 to 2000?
Did the twentieth century span the years 1900–1999 or the years 1901–2000?
Did the Twentieth Century span the years 1900–1999 or the years 1901–2000?
Did the twentieth century span the years 1900 to 1999 or the years 1901 to 2000?
Did the twentieth century span the years 1900–1999 or the years 1901–2000?
According to the style manual, centuries should be spelled out in lower case. Therefore the correct spelling of "twentieth century" should be lower not upper case like "Twentieth Century". The style manual also indicates that beginning and ending years should be separated with an en-dash as in 1900-1999 or 1901-2000.
The only answer choice that does both of these correctly is the second one.
Answer:
Explanation:
A bacteria Bigwig could be important and famous bacteriologist or someone similar!
Hope this helped! :0)