Answer:
The fish conveys the lesson that we must not make hasty and impulsive decisions. This lesson reveals the theme of how misinterpretations can result in disastrous situations.
Explanation:
In chapter 22 of “What, of this Goldfish, Would You Wish?” we can read: "" He said, "says the fish, interrupting," exactly what he was doing. But you didn’t get it. Honestly, your Hebrew, it’s terrible. ""
This happens shortly after Sergei misinterprets Yonata's actions and ends up acting in a hasty and impulsive way, killing Yonata unintentionally. The fish then shows how these thoughtless actions and led by misinterpretation have disastrous results and that we must prioritize rationality before acting and understanding the situation that is happening around us, before taking action.
The goldfish, a wise character in the story, conveys a lesson about the importance of contentment and the pitfalls of excessive greed. This lesson forms a major theme of the story, teaching readers to value real happiness over material possessions.
In paragraph 22, the
archetypal wise character
, the goldfish, is teaching Sergei a crucial lesson about the importance of being content with what one has and the dangers of excessive greed. This theme is unveiled throughout the story, as Sergei's dissatisfaction with his life leads him to make poor choices. The goldfish, representing wisdom and understanding, emphasizes this point to Sergei hoping to guide him towards better decisions. For example, the goldfish tries to show Sergei that happiness and satisfaction cannot be attained through mere material possessions alone. This theme is a common one in literature and serves a broader purpose by teaching readers necessary life lessons.
#SPJ3
Bodger is loyal only to the cat and his boy Peter, but he is also a natural leader.
B.
Bodger is an older, friendly dog, but he also likes to fight.
C.
Bodger is the strongest, fastest, and smartest of the three animals.
D.
Bodger is only interested in his next meal and does not bother to help the other animals.
simple
compound
complex
compound-complex
fragment
Answer:
That is a complex sentence.
Explanation:
God bless:)
What does Mr. Pontellier’s letter reveal about his personality?
A. He is jealous that his wife may be thinking of leaving him for a much younger man.
B. He hates to be away from his family for such a long period of time and aches to return home.
C. He is very concerned about maintaining an appearance of financial good standing within his community.
D. He feels his wife has a good grasp of the situation at home and relies on her to take care of everything.
Answer:
C. He is very concerned about maintaining an appearance of financial good standing within his community.
Explanation:
Mr . Pontellier is interested in appearances. His wife, Edna, wants a different life from the one she is having with her husband. However, Mr. Pontellier is more concerned about other people's opinions than about his wife 's feelings. In fact, he is a business man and wants to keep to a good imagine of his financial status. This is evident when Edna is away from home because she is looking for new adventures. However, Mr. Pontellier does not care about his wife's true reasons; he just wants people to think that she has not gone away because of financial problems.
^^ The last correct option is the segement that says: There are distinct social possibilties in your profile.
The correct answer is Sentence 4 "Paine’s logic is indisputable; without his words, America might have remained subject to British rule to this day".
Explanation:
The word "objective" refers to the quality of text in which the author just reports facts or evidence rather than personal opinions or judgments. In the case of summarizes that are brief accounts of the ideas of another text, a summary is objective when it only includes the ideas of the original text rather than the ideas or opinions of the person writing the summary.
This implies in the case of the text presented that summarizes the ideas of Thomas Paine the sentence that is subjective and needs to be revised to make the summary objective is "Paine’s logic is indisputable; without his words, America might have remained subject to British rule to this day" (Sentence 4) because in this sentence the author of the summary includes his personal perspective but judging Paine's ideas as indisputable and necessary which is not adequate as only the ideas of the ideas of the original text and not the ideas of the author of the summary need to be included for objectivity.