According to the outdoor amphitheater ruins, it is likely ancient Greeks performed plays, played music, and were skilled builders. Their adventurous spirit is also evident in their colonization efforts and constructions. Fear of nature or reluctance to leave home are theories not supported by evidence.
Based on the ruins of the outdoor amphitheater in ancient Greece, we can make several educated assumptions. First, the Greeks probably performed plays. This is suggested by the existence of the amphitheater itself, an infrastructure typically used for performances including plays and musical shows. Ancient Greek plays were an integral part of their culture, with playwrights like Sophocles and Aristophanes creating works that have influenced drama for centuries.
They probably played music. Alongside performances, music was an essential component of ancient Greek life, and the amphitheater would have been an ideal venue for musical performances.
A clear inference we can make is the ancient Greeks were skilled builders. The capability to construct an amphitheater, as mentioned in the reference, not only represents the engineering acumen of the ancient Greeks but also their artistic vision and execution.
However, the statement that Greeks were probably introverted and unlikely to leave home is unfounded. Ancient Greeks established colonies far from their homeland, showing their adventurous spirit and willingness to go beyond the known world. Moreover, they don't appear to have feared nature, considering their ability to shape it for their needs, create sculptures, and build impressive architectural structures.
Learn more about Ancient Greek Culture here:
#SPJ3
Answer:
O They probably played music.
O They probably performed plays.
O They probably were skilled builders.
Explanation:
Just took the test, got the answer correct, hope i helped! good luck!
Answer:
- The explanation that connects the point to the examples provided.
Explanation:
The element that is required to accomplish this paragraph would be 'an explanation that links the point to the examples provided.' The explanatory sentence will not only assist in combining the ideas presented in the examples coherently but also helps offer a sense of closure to complete the paragraph. This will make the paragraph an accomplished whole conveying a perfect and reasonable blend of ideas and the explanatory sentence will make it more effective.
To complete the student's analysis, the paragraph needs specific examples from the text that highlight Gilgamesh's strengths, belief in teamwork, and his philosophical journey, such as dealing with human mortality and the importance of friendship.
To complete the student's analysis of Gilgamesh: A New English Version, the paragraph should include specific examples from the text that illustrate Gilgamesh's strength and leadership and how these traits contribute to his role as an epic hero.
Additionally, the analysis could benefit from explicit references to the text demonstrating Gilgamesh's belief in teamwork, such as quotes or instances where his actions directly reflect this trait.
The original text where Gilgamesh encourages Enkidu can provide powerful evidence for the student's claim.
Furthermore, a discussion of the broader thematic elements present in the epic, such as human mortality, the importance of friendship, and the quest for immortality, can offer deeper insights into Gilgamesh's character and the complex nature of his heroism.
These considerations add depth to the student's essay by showing how Gilgamesh embodies the qualities of an epic hero beyond physical strength, reaching onto the psychological and philosophical dimensions of his character journey.
#SPJ12
(b)purpose
(c)concluding statement
(d)example
The final section of an essay is known as the Concluding Statement.
To learn more about essays visit:
#SPJ2
Answer:
concluding statement
Explanation:
this is the awnser because you are concluding your essay.
hope this helps!
Answer:
The Author 'Chekhov' uses internal dialogue to characterize Yevgeny in the story "Home" an evidence in the opening paragraph which goes by "Yevgeny is a prosecutor of the circuit court, someone who carries out legal proceedings against a person accused of a crime. it makes sense to think about how much of Yevgeny's legal background will affect the way he handles this problem with his son."
Explanation:
Through this internal monologue, readers can better understand the different aspect of Yevgeny's character and get a glimpse into his thoughts. This opening paragraph starts the action towards the conflict between Yevgeny and his son Seryozha. The Author wrote the story in third person point of view, and the story is told through the thought of Yevgeny.
Yevgeny is a methological and logical man who thinks in terms of number; a typical man of the court. Theefore he had disagreements with his son for smoking.
An author characterizes a figure through internal dialogue by revealing their thoughts, feelings, or mental conversations. This can indicate their motivations, personality traits, or responses to situations. The dialogue can show Yevgeny as thoughtful and moral or superficial and self-centered, based on the context.
In order to answer this question, the specific text referencing Yevgeny would be needed. However, generally speaking, an author may use internal dialogue to characterize a person in literature. Internal dialogue refers to the thoughts, feelings, or mental conversations that a character has with himself. This tool lets us peek into a character's mind and understand their motivation, personality traits, and response to situations.
For instance, if Yevgeny is often shown debating ethical issues in his internal dialogue, he might be characterized as a deeply moral and thoughtful individual. Conversely, if his thoughts mostly revolve around trivial pursuits or selfish needs, it shows a more superficial or self-centered personality.
#SPJ11
Answer:
Explanation:
Despite the continuously changing face of crime and the development of cybercrime, the majority of money laundering techniques discovered by law enforcement are still conventional. While cash is steadily losing favor with consumers, it is still one of the primary ways used to launder the profits of crime, according to Europol's newest strategic analysis, 'Why is cash still king?'
Almost all sorts of crime utilize cash to aid money laundering at some point, not only classic crimes that create cash gains, but also dangers posed by emerging technologies such as virtual currencies, where currency is employed as a tool to conceal the unlawful origin of revenues.
In the EU, the use of cash is the most common cause for suspicious transaction reports in the financial system, accounting for almost 30% of all reports. Around a third of all inputs to Europol in the area of money laundering are reports on questionable physical currency transactions.
Despite a small drop in the usage of cash for payments in the EU, demand for large denomination notes not typically used for payments, such as the EUR 500 note, has remained stable. Over 30% of the value of all banknotes in circulation is represented by the EUR 500 note alone (1). This raises issues about why they're being used and if they're tied to illegal activities, both of which should be investigated further.
Linking funds to criminal activity continues to be a difficult task for law enforcement. "Criminals' use of cash continues to be one of the most important impediments to effective investigations and conviction," says Europol Director Rob Wainwright. "It's a danger that hasn't gotten enough international attention or legislative responses." Criminals frequently exploit a fragmented enforcement strategy at national and international levels, as well as varied regulatory regimes throughout EU Member States, by adapting their techniques and routes to take advantage of these gaps. If we are to combat these illegal activities, we must boost our efforts to improve international collaboration and information sharing, as well as build a more harmonised policy among EU Member States regarding cash flows inside the EU."
Answer:
Robert: “What I want to do now is keep on moving so that I won’t take root in any one place”
Explanation:
This sentence said by Robert to his brother Andrew in the beginning of Eugene O’Neill’s play Beyond the Horizon” reflects Robert’s dream of leaving the farm. Before this sentence Andrew says to Robert that he should have gone back to college for completing his studies. But Robert tells him that he left college because their father wanted to save money, and further even if their father had not wanted so, he would have left college because what he (Robert) really wanted to do was keep moving, because he did not like the idea to stay at any one place.
There are some other references too about Robert’s dream of leaving the farm, for example poetry from the poetry book Robert was reading, (read by Andrew) has these lines,
"I have loved wind and light and the bright sea. But holy and most sacred night, not as I love and have loved thee."
But the sentence spoken by Robert himself reflects his dream most clearly.