Why are the cave paintings of early humans significant?

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Explanation:

The cave paintings of early humans significant how they used to live, the food they used to eat, and what all they made. Early paintings also significant hunting of animals.

Hope this helps....

Have a nice day!!!!

Answer 2

Answer: It shows how they use to live and their form of communication

Related Questions

In the 1890s, the United States used a Gold Standard. Which political party did not support the Gold Standard?
Human rights are the rights and freedoms, such as those named in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, to which all people are entitled.True or false.
In the early days of the United States, the central government was weak compared to the state governments. The leaders recognized there were problems with this arrangement. When they wrote the Constitution, they gave more power to the central government. The states still have authority within their borders but must follow the Constitution and its laws. What system of government does the United States have? Unitary Federation Parliamentary Confederation
Summarize the political structure of the Western Roman Empire after the empire's collapse. Submit as a text entry.
Neville chamberlain of great britain and adolf hitler of germany met at the munich conference. what concept was represented at the munich conference?

Why was popular sovereignty so well-supported as a just and fair way to settle the slavery question? It seemed to have worked well in the Compromise of 1850. It allowed citizens of a territory to decide the slave issue. It allowed Congress to have some input into the political events in territories. It gave people a chance to let the Federal government decide for them.

Answers

The correct answers are A) It seemed to have worked well in the Compromise of 1850 and B) It allowed citizens of a territory to decide the slave issue.

Popular sovereignty was o well-supported as a just and fair way to settle the slavery question in that it seemed to have worked well in the Compromise of 1850 and it allowed citizens of a territory to decide the slave issue.

The political confrontation between free states and non-free states was one of the biggest political issues of that time. Southerners knew that their economy was based on slavery to produce crops in their plantations. That is why they opposed so much to the Northern abolitionist ideas. So popular sovereignty was the concept that allowed to settle the slavery issue in the United States at least, momentarily, in that the citizens were the ones that should have to decide.

Popular Sovereignty was well supported because the southerners argued that it wasn't fair for the south if the North was able to abolish slavery, why couldn't the south do it. It could also have started the Civil War earlier; the North and south were on the brink of war. The compromise of 1850 compromised admitting the state California into the Union, as a free state. What the south got out of that the North had to hunt down and bring back runaway slaves. Because of this decision, Northern Abolitionists were deeply upset from what Congress had done, AKA the House of Representatives and the Senate. This would later start fights in Congress. This also led South Carolina seceding from the Union.(Secession is when a state unlawfully breaks away from a country or province. This also led to the rest of the south except the state of Missouri to secede, and led to Emancipation Proclamation made and announced by the president at the time, President Abraham Lincoln. Also it led to his assassination of him, by John Wilkes Booth, a southerner Confederate. He was later found in a barn, then shot and killed. This led to inauguration of Vice President Andrew Johnson. Which also started Reconstruction; the 10 percent plan by Lincoln, the Wade Davis Bill, and the Radical Republicans. It also led to the black codes and the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendment.

Hope this helped you A LOT :)

What reason did Taney give for why he believed Dred Scott was an enslaved person

Answers

The case of Dred Scott v. Sandford was a judicial claim, crucial in the history of the United States, resolved by the Supreme Court in 1857, in which it was decided to deprive any inhabitant of African descent, whether slaves or not, the right to citizenship; and the authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories of the country was removed from Congress. The decision was drafted by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney.

On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney issued the majority opinion. Taney ruled that:

-Anyone of African descent, whether slave or free, was not a citizen of the United States, according to the Constitution.

-The Ordinance of 1787 could not confer neither freedom nor citizenship within the Northwest Territory to non-white individuals.

-The provisions of the Missouri Compromise were annulled as a legislative act, since the act exceeded the powers of Congress, as it tried to exclude slavery and impart liberty and citizenship to non-white people in the north part of the Louisiana territory.

The court ruled that African-Americans had no right to freedom or citizenship. As they were not citizens, they did not have the legal capacity to file a lawsuit in federal court. Because slaves were private property, Congress did not have the power to regulate slavery in the territories and could not revoke the rights of a slave owner according to the place where he lived. This decision nullified the essence of the Missouri Compromise, which divided the territories into free or slave jurisdictions. Speaking on behalf of the majority, Taney ruled that because Scott simply considered himself the private property of his owners, he was subject to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits taking ownership of his owner "without due process."

Drett scott was considered property and the court can not take away property.

A _ is a series of rulers from the same family.A. Theocracy
B. Dynasty
C. Empire
D. Monarchy

Answers

A DYNASTY is a series of rulers from the same family.

A Political Dynasty is where a family or group maintains power by controlling the state for several generations.

Examples of a Dynasty are:

*Bourbon Dynasty - a European royal line that ruled in France from 1589 to 1793 and also ruled Spain, Naples, and Sicily.
*Ming Dynasty - the imperial dynasty of China that ruled from 1368 to 1644

In Theocracy, government leaders are members of the clergy and its legal system is based on religious law.

An Empire is a political structure where one state dominates other states. It Empire head is called Emperor or Empress.

Monarchy is a form of government where one or more individual reigns sovereignty until death or abdication. It head of state can be a King or Queen.

PLEASE ANSWER SOON WILL MARK BRAINEST! How did Ibn al-Haytham contribute to the development of the modern camera?

He defined how the camera obscura worked.
He was the first person to think of the camera obscura.
He created a camera based on the camera obscura.
He made the camera obscura popular by trading it on the Silk Road.

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

mark brainliest

Answer:

Its A

Explanation:

I have good notes

how did actions by the stamp act crowd raise questions of whether protests in the colonies represented more than opposition to british policies?

Answers

Answer:

To adopt system of the British government of way they colonist other countries

Final answer:

The actions by the Stamp Act crowd raised questions of whether protests in the colonies represented more than opposition to British policies. The protests were not only about opposing the taxes but also about constitutional issues and the colonists' lack of representation in Parliament.

Explanation:

The actions by the Stamp Act crowd raised questions of whether protests in the colonies represented more than opposition to British policies. The passage of the Stamp Act in 1765 imposed direct taxes on the colonists, which triggered the first serious protest against British imperial policy. The protests were not only about opposing the taxes, but also about the constitutional issues and the colonists' lack of representation in Parliament.

Learn more about protests in the colonies here:

brainly.com/question/34227684

#SPJ11

A common trait shared by many developing nations is that theyhave less developed infrastructure

are all located in Latin America

have political stability

have ”Western” economies

Answers

Not all developing countries are in Latin America; many are in Africa and Asia.

They are not called "Western" - as most western countries are developed, not developing. The correct answer is that they have less developed infrastructure, as their infrastructure is still developing.

The common trait shared by many developing nations is that they : have less developed infrastructure

Compared to the developed nations, less-developed ones usually do not have the quality of the public service that the developed one have, such as bad roads, bad communication service, bad law enforcement system, etc

hope this helps

Other Questions

The discovery of gold in Transvaal contributed to the start of _____?the Anglo-Boer WarWorld War IIWorld War Ithe Peloponnesian War

What was the number one import into Rome? Jewels Animals Silk Grain

How can the way that roosevelt created the ccc be considered a political compromise

The idea that there should be little interference by the government or society in economic competition is called ______. horizontal consolidation assimilation deflation Social Darwinism